Skip to main content

Ship Property Management System CVE-2025-9210

| EUVDEUVD-2025-210738 HIGH
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-08-18 Mandiant GHSA-83h2-xpgj-mf4q
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Mandiant
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid low-privilege account
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate and capture issued JWT
  3. Exploit
    Decode and modify role/permission claims in payload
  4. Execution
    Re-encode tampered JWT
  5. Persist
    Submit forged token to privileged API endpoints
  6. Impact
    Access or modify data as elevated user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must hold a valid, authenticated user account in the Ship Property Management System - unauthenticated exploitation is not possible given PR:L in the CVSS vector. No special system configuration or non-default feature is required beyond the application's standard JWT-based session management, which appears to be the default authentication mechanism. The limiting factors are: (1) possession of any valid credential, (2) network access to the application endpoint, and (3) awareness of the vulnerability to know which JWT claims to modify. There is no user interaction required from a victim, and the attack complexity is low once credentials are obtained.

Impact

The CVSS 8.1 score reflects a genuinely serious flaw: network-reachable (AV:N), low complexity (AC:L), no user interaction required (UI:N), and high impact on both confidentiality and integrity (C:H/I:H). The principal limiting factor is PR:L - an attacker must first hold a valid user account, which reduces the attack surface compared to a fully unauthenticated flaw. No EPSS data was provided, and the absence of a KEV listing suggests exploitation has not been observed at scale. However, the simplicity of JWT tampering - requiring only a browser developer console or HTTP proxy - means the technical barrier is extremely low for any authenticated user who is aware of the flaw. The maritime software sector often operates with shared credentials or broad account provisioning, which could make the PR:L prerequisite easier to satisfy than in other contexts. Overall this is a real, high-priority remediation target rather than a theoretical risk inflated by CVSS scoring.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a standard user account logs in, captures the issued JWT using browser developer tools or an intercepting proxy such as Burp Suite, and decodes the base64url payload to reveal role or permission claims. The attacker modifies the claim (e.g., changing 'role':'viewer' to 'role':'admin'), re-encodes the payload, and substitutes it into subsequent requests - the server accepts the forged token without signature verification and grants administrative access. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified, but the technique is well-documented and requires no specialized tooling.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 18, 2026

JWT signature validation is entirely absent in Otalio Ship Property Management System before version 2.22.0, allowing any authenticated user to forge arbitrary token claims and escalate to higher privilege levels. Because the server accepts tampered JWT payloads without verifying the cryptographic signature, a low-privileged account holder can self-promote to administrator or other elevated roles by modifying their own token. Mandiant disclosed this flaw; no public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to Otalio Ship Property Management System version 2.22.0 or later, which introduces proper JWT signature validation per the vendor patch. Patch availability is confirmed by vendor per EUVD-2025-210738; the exact fix version (2.22.0) is derived from the affected-version boundary in that record. Consult the Mandiant disclosure at https://github.com/mandiant/Vulnerability-Disclosures/blob/master/2026/MNDT-2026-0023.md for remediation guidance. As a compensating control prior to patching, operators should audit user account provisioning and reduce the number of active low-privilege accounts, since an attacker requires a valid authenticated session. Additionally, consider deploying an API gateway or WAF capable of inspecting and rejecting structurally anomalous JWTs (e.g., those with a 'none' algorithm header or mismatched claim structures), though this is a partial mitigation and not a substitute for patching. Session invalidation and forced re-login after patching are recommended to clear any forged tokens that may have been issued pre-fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

Ship Property Management System 0 <2.22.0

Affected Packages

euvd ship_property_management_system fix: 2.22.0

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) are composed of a base64url-encoded header, payload, and cryptographic signature. CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature) describes the root cause: the Otalio Ship Property Management System does not validate the HMAC or RSA signature on received tokens, meaning the payload - which typically carries role, permission, or identity claims - can be freely modified by the bearer. This is distinct from algorithm-confusion attacks; the system appears to skip signature verification entirely. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:otalio:ship_property_management_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* for all versions before 2.22.0. The maritime property management domain typically involves vessel records, crew data, financial transactions, and compliance documentation - all of which would be exposed to an attacker with elevated access.

Know when Ship Property Management System gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Mandiant) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable application, low complexity, authenticated user required (PR:L); integrity and confidentiality fully compromised via privilege escalation; no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Mandiant).

CVSS VectorVendor: Mandiant

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 18, 2026 - 19:04 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 18, 2026 - 18:25 cve.org
HIGH 8.1

DescriptionCVE.org

Missing signature validation in JSON Web Tokens in Otalio Ship Property Management System versions before 2.22.0 allows authenticated attackers to escalate privileges via tampering with JWTs

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Otalio Ship Property Management System contains a critical authentication vulnerability (CVE-2025-9210) that allows any authorized user to escalate privileges to administrator, exposing sensitive property and tenant data to unauthorized access and manipulation. Organizations must treat this as a priority security incident due to the compliance implications and operational risks posed by potential insider threats.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche maritime property management software, limited enterprise footprint
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy