Skip to main content

PassMark DirectIo64.sys CVE-2025-52347

| EUVDEUVD-2025-209609 HIGH
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-05-01 mitre
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local user credentials
  2. Delivery
    Install/execute exploit code
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted IOCTL 0x8011E044 to DirectIo64.sys
  4. Execution
    Read kernel memory addresses
  5. Persist
    Inject code into SYSTEM process
  6. Impact
    Achieve SYSTEM-level privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

PassMark BurnInTest 11.0 Build 1011 or earlier, OSForensics 11.1 Build 1007 or earlier, or PerformanceTest 11.1 Build 1004 or earlier must be installed on the target Windows system, which loads the vulnerable DirectIo64.sys kernel driver. Attacker requires local authenticated access with low-privilege user credentials (PR:L) - standard user account is sufficient, not administrator. The DirectIo64.sys driver must be loaded and accessible via DeviceIoControl API calls, which is the default state when PassMark tools are installed. No special configuration, non-default settings, or user interaction required beyond initial system access. Exploitation is limited to Windows platforms where these PassMark products are deployed, typically enterprise testing labs, IT diagnostic workstations, and digital forensics systems rather than general end-user devices.

Impact

Real-world risk is moderate-to-high for environments where PassMark tools are installed. The CVSS score of 7.8 accurately reflects the local attack vector (AV:L) requiring low-privileged authenticated access (PR:L), but delivers complete system compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H) with low attack complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N). The GitHub repository contains proof-of-concept code, significantly lowering exploitation barriers for attackers with initial foothold access. However, absence from CISA KEV suggests this is not yet exploited in broad campaigns, likely due to the niche deployment of PassMark utilities primarily in enterprise IT departments, testing labs, and forensics environments. The attack requires local authenticated access, limiting opportunistic remote exploitation but making it highly valuable in post-exploitation scenarios, lateral movement, or insider threat contexts. Organizations using these PassMark products should prioritize patching, especially on systems accessible to multiple users or in environments with privilege separation requirements. The specific IOCTL control code (0x8011E044) is publicly documented in the POC, enabling easy weaponization.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A penetration tester or malicious insider with standard user credentials on a Windows workstation running PassMark PerformanceTest gains initial access through phishing or stolen credentials. They download the publicly available POC from the researcher's GitHub repository and execute the exploit code, which sends a specially crafted IOCTL 0x8011E044 request to the DirectIo64.sys driver. The vulnerable driver fails to validate the IOCTL parameters, allowing the attacker to read sensitive kernel memory and leverage this access to inject code into a SYSTEM-level process, escalating from limited user to full administrative control of the machine and potentially pivoting to other systems on the network.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 01, 2026

Kernel memory access and privilege escalation in PassMark DirectIo64.sys driver affect BurnInTest 11.0 Build 1011, OSForensics 11.1 Build 1007, and PerformanceTest 11.1 Build 1004. Local authenticated attackers can send crafted IOCTL 0x8011E044 calls to the vulnerable driver to read arbitrary kernel memory and elevate privileges to SYSTEM level. Public exploit code is available in the researcher's GitHub repository. EPSS data not available; no CISA KEV listing indicates no confirmed widespread exploitation, though POC availability lowers the barrier for local attacks.

RemediationAI

Check PassMark vendor advisories and version history pages for patched releases addressing CVE-2025-52347. Update BurnInTest to builds newer than 11.0 Build 1011, OSForensics to builds newer than 11.1 Build 1007, and PerformanceTest to builds newer than 11.1 Build 1004 when available. Consult the vendor update pages at https://www.passmark.com/products/burnintest/history.php, https://www.passmark.com/products/performancetest/history.php, and https://www.osforensics.com/whats-new.html for the latest secure versions, though specific fix build numbers are not independently confirmed in available data. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement compensating controls: restrict installation of PassMark tools to dedicated testing systems isolated from production networks; enforce principle of least privilege by limiting which user accounts can access systems with these tools installed; monitor for abnormal IOCTL activity to DirectIo64.sys using EDR solutions; disable or unload the DirectIo64.sys driver when not actively needed (note: this will break tool functionality). Consider removing PassMark tools from multi-user systems or environments requiring strict privilege separation until vendor patches are confirmed.

Affected VersionsENISA

n/a n/a

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

DirectIo64.sys is a signed kernel-mode driver shipped with PassMark diagnostic and forensics tools to enable low-level hardware access for performance testing and system analysis. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation (CWE-20) in the driver's IOCTL handler for control code 0x8011E044. Windows IOCTL (Input/Output Control) codes allow user-mode applications to communicate with kernel drivers through DeviceIoControl API calls. Without proper bounds checking and authorization enforcement, an attacker can craft IOCTL requests that read or manipulate kernel memory regions normally inaccessible to user-mode processes. Because the driver runs at Ring 0 with SYSTEM privileges, successful exploitation grants complete control over the operating system. This class of driver vulnerability is common in system utilities that require hardware access, where developers may prioritize functionality over secure IOCTL validation.

Know when N A gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
May 01, 2026 - 19:22 NVD
7.8 (HIGH)
CVE Published
May 01, 2026 - 00:00 nvd
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

An issue in the component DirectIo64.sys of PassMark BurnInTest v11.0 Build 1011, OSForensics v11.1 Build 1007, and PerformanceTest v11.1 Build 1004 allows attackers to access kernel memory and escalate privileges via a crafted IOCTL 0x8011E044 call.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2025-52347 is a kernel privilege escalation vulnerability in PassMark's DirectIo64.sys driver affecting BurnInTest 11.0, OSForensics 11.1, and PerformanceTest 11.1, allowing local authenticated users to escalate to SYSTEM-level privileges and read arbitrary kernel memory. Organizations using these tools face risk of complete system compromise by any authenticated local user, with public exploit code reducing attacker skill requirements. This requires immediate inventory and mitigation since no patch is currently available from the vendor.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Disable or uninstall affected PassMark tools if not operationally critical; (2) Implement driver signing policy via Group Policy/Secure Boot to prevent loading of unsigned DirectIo64.sys; (3) Use endpoint detection and response (EDR) to monitor for suspicious IOCTL 0x8011E044 calls and SYSTEM-level privilege escalation from these applications; (4) Restrict tool access to non-privileged user accounts and isolated systems; (5) Monitor PassMark security advisories for patch releases.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 96% exploitable
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy