ArubaOS
CVE-2025-37133
HIGH
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain privileged CLI credentials
-
DeliveryAuthenticate to AOS-8 management interface
-
ExploitInject shell metacharacters into CLI argument
-
ExecutionEscape restricted CLI to underlying OS
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary commands as privileged user
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a privileged (administrator-level) authenticated CLI account on an AOS-8 Controller or Mobility Conductor; the flaw is command injection (CWE-77) in the CLI binary, so a valid privileged session reachable over the network is the core prerequisite. The limiting factor is the PR:H privilege level - this is not reachable by unauthenticated or low-privilege users, which confines realistic abuse to compromised admin credentials or malicious insiders. No user interaction by a victim is required (UI:N). The unversioned wildcard CPEs mean defenders must confirm which specific AOS-8 release trains are affected via the HPE advisory. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than a drop-everything emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N, base 7.2 HIGH) indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation but requires HIGH privileges (PR:H), meaning the attacker must already hold a privileged/administrative CLI account on the AOS-8 Controller or Mobility Conductor. This privilege prerequisite substantially lowers real-world risk and reframes the flaw primarily as a privilege-escalation / sandbox-escape path (CLI-restricted admin to full underlying-OS command execution) rather than a path for anonymous compromise. Supporting signals align: EPSS is 1.23% (68th percentile) - low absolute exploitation probability consistent with an auth-gated bug; the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV; and no public POC is referenced. No signals conflict - the low EPSS, absence of KEV, and high-privilege requirement all point the same direction. The impact if exploited is severe (C:H/I:H/A:H - full OS-level code execution on network infrastructure), so the flaw matters for defense-in-depth, but the combination of required privileged access plus no evidence of exploitation makes it a patch-in-normal-cycle item, not an active-threat emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained privileged administrative CLI credentials (for example via phishing, credential reuse, or an insider) logs into the AOS-8 Controller/Mobility Conductor management interface and injects crafted shell metacharacters into a vulnerable CLI command argument, breaking out of the restricted CLI to run arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. No public exploit code is referenced; exploitation requires valid high-privilege authentication, so this is realistically a post-compromise escalation or malicious-insider scenario. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Authenticated command injection in the ArubaOS (AOS-8) Controller and Mobility Conductor CLI lets an attacker who already holds a privileged administrator-level CLI account execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. The weakness is limited by its PR:H prerequisite - a valid high-privilege, network-reachable CLI session is required - so realistic exposure is confined to compromised admin credentials, reused/leaked administrator logins, or malicious insiders rather than unauthenticated outsiders. At time of analysis there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit code identified; EPSS sits at 1.23% (68th percentile), consistent with a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than an emergency, and defenders should confirm the exact affected AOS-8 release trains against the HPE advisory because the CPE entries carry unversioned wildcards.
RemediationAI
No specific fixed version is identified in the available intelligence, so the primary action is to consult the HPE advisory (https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw04957en_us&docLocale=en_US) to determine which AOS-8 release train is affected and apply the vendor-designated fixed build; upgrading controllers and conductors in coordinated fashion is required because Mobility Conductors manage subordinate controllers. Until that build is deployed, prioritize compensating controls that directly counter the PR:H prerequisite: restrict CLI/management access to a dedicated out-of-band management VLAN with firewall rules and management ACLs so the controller or conductor CLI is not reachable from general user or guest networks (trade-off: administrators lose convenient in-band access and must use the management path or console); enforce unique per-administrator credentials with MFA and remove or downgrade unused high-privilege CLI accounts to shrink the pool of sessions that can trigger injection (trade-off: added identity overhead and possible loss of shared-account break-glass workflows); log and alert on privileged CLI sessions and unexpected child processes or shell invocations on the OS, since successful exploitation requires an authenticated admin session that should be detectable (trade-off: requires log forwarding off-box before a compromise, which itself must be hardened); and rotate any administrator credentials suspected of exposure. Avoid treating network segmentation alone as a full fix - it reduces reachability but does not remediate the injection flaw itself.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a CWE-77 command injection in the CLI binary of the AOS-8 Controller/Mobility Conductor operating system: user-supplied CLI input is passed into an operating-system command context without adequate neutralization of shell metacharacters, so crafted arguments executed inside an already-privileged administrative CLI session are interpreted by the underlying OS instead of being treated as inert data. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the attack surface is the remotely reachable management CLI (SSH/CLI access to the controller or conductor), that no victim interaction is needed, and that the impact is limited to the vulnerable component's own security context (S:U) but carries high confidentiality, integrity, and availability consequences because commands run with privileged OS rights. The affected platform is Aruba Networks' ArubaOS 8.x management appliance family - Controllers and Mobility Conductors - as reflected in the cpe:2.3:o:arubanetworks:arubaos CPE entries, all of which use wildcard versions and therefore do not by themselves identify which maintenance releases are patched or vulnerable.
Know when Arubaos gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CLI is network-reachable (AV:N) and injection is straightforward (AC:L), but a privileged admin account is required (PR:H); OS command execution yields full C:H/I:H/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).
CVSS VectorVendor: hpe
DescriptionCVE.org
An authenticated command injection vulnerability exists in the CLI binary of an AOS-8 Controller/Mobility Conductor operating system. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated malicious actor to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.
Executive ViewAI
Organizations running ArubaOS (AOS-8) Controller and Mobility Conductor face a high-severity command injection risk that requires authenticated, high-privilege CLI access to exploit. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, so leadership should focus on limiting privileged credential exposure and hardening management access to prevent insider or stolen-credential abuse.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting CLI management access to trusted networks, enforcing MFA and least privilege for administrator accounts, rotating privileged credentials, enabling detailed CLI audit logging, and monitoring for anomalous command execution. Apply vendor patch when available.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
Heap-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execut
There is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the underlying Utility daemon that could lead to unauthenticated remote code
There is a command injection vulnerability that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially
There is a vulnerability in the AP Certificate Management Service which could allow a threat actor to execute an unauthe
There are vulnerabilities in the Soft AP Daemon Service which could allow a threat actor to execute an unauthenticated R
There are vulnerabilities in the Soft AP Daemon Service which could allow a threat actor to execute an unauthenticated R
There is a command injection vulnerability in the underlying deauthentication service that could lead to unauthenticated
There are command injection vulnerabilities in the underlying Soft AP Daemon service that could lead to unauthenticated
There is a command injection vulnerability in the underlying Central Communications service that could lead to unauthent
There is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the underlying SAE (Simultaneous Authentication of Equals) service that coul
There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the underlying Central Communications service that could lead to unauthenti
There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the underlying Central Communications service that could lead to unauthenti
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB