Skip to main content

Xen Windows PV Drivers CVE-2025-27462

| EUVDEUVD-2025-210443 CRITICAL
Incorrect Default Permissions (CWE-276)
2026-07-09 XEN GHSA-8q95-g4m7-2crp
Critical
Disputed · 9.4 Vendor: XEN
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain unprivileged local access to Windows guest
  2. Delivery
    Open unprotected XenCons device (no security descriptor)
  3. Exploit
    Abuse exposed console facility
  4. Execution
    Escalate privileges within guest
  5. Impact
    Full guest compromise (C/I/A)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Default permission hardening
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires local code execution inside a Windows guest that has the Xen PV Drivers installed, specifically the XenCons console interface whose device object is created without a security descriptor and is therefore reachable by any unprivileged user account. The concrete prerequisite is: the target must be a Windows VM running on Xen with these PV drivers present, and the attacker must already have some unprivileged local presence (a logged-in user account or a foothold process) in that guest. Limiting factors: it is not remotely exploitable over the network (AV:L), it does not affect Windows guests without the Xen PV drivers, and it provides no benefit to an attacker who has no local access to the guest; conversely, no administrative rights, user interaction, or non-default configuration are needed once local access exists, since the interface is exposed by default.

Impact

The XEN-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H, base 9.4) is internally consistent with a missing-ACL local privilege escalation: exploitation is local (AV:L), needs low complexity and no user interaction, and the high subsequent-system metrics reflect escalation beyond the vulnerable component into the guest OS. Note the tension in privileges: the vector uses PR:N, yet the flaw is a privilege escalation that inherently requires the attacker to already be a local, logged-in unprivileged user - so realistic exploitation does require prior local access, which materially limits blast radius versus a remote-network flaw. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, POC, or KEV entry was provided, so the automatable/exploitation-maturity signals are unknown; absence of these is not evidence of low risk but does mean there is no confirmation of active or automated exploitation. Overall this is a genuinely high-severity local-EP issue for any Windows guest running Xen PV drivers, but the local-only vector makes it a serious hardening/patch priority rather than an emergency internet-facing exposure.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged user (or a compromised low-privilege service/process) on a Windows guest running Xen PV drivers opens the unprotected XenCons device object that lacks a security descriptor, and uses the exposed console facility to influence privileged operations and escalate to full guest compromise. Because the CVSS vector is AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no social engineering or complex preconditions are needed once the attacker has any local foothold. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, so an attacker would need to develop tooling against the interface.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 09, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Xen Windows PV Drivers (the XenCons paravirtualized console interface) lets any unprivileged user of a Windows guest reach a device object that ships with no security descriptor, so its facilities are fully accessible to non-administrators. Successful abuse can yield full compromise of the guest with integrity, confidentiality and availability impact, and the vendor scores it critical (CVSS 4.0 base 9.4) with subsequent-system impact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not on CISA KEV. This is one of three related XSA-468 issues (XenCons/CVE-2025-27462, XenIface/CVE-2025-27463, XenBus/CVE-2025-27464).

RemediationAI

Apply the corrected Xen Windows PV Drivers from Xen Security Advisory XSA-468 (https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-468.html), which adds proper security descriptors to the affected device objects; no exact fixed version string is given in the provided data, so obtain the patched driver build referenced by XSA-468 rather than assuming a version number (Upstream fix available per vendor advisory; released patched version not independently confirmed here). Where immediate patching of a guest is not possible, compensating controls are limited because the exposure is inside the guest: restrict the set of users who can log in interactively or run code on affected Windows guests (reducing the pool of local unprivileged accounts that could abuse XenCons), and treat any multi-user or shell-hosting Windows guest on Xen as higher risk. Because the weakness is a missing ACL on a driver-created object, there is no safe in-guest configuration toggle to remove access without the patch, so prioritize deploying the corrected drivers across all Windows guests, including templates and golden images.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows PV drivers all

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Xen PV (paravirtualized) drivers are installed inside Windows guests running on the Xen hypervisor to provide fast disk, network, console and management channels between the guest and the host/toolstack. The affected interface here, XenCons, is the PV console facility exposed to userspace. The root cause maps to CWE-276 (Incorrect Default Permissions): the device object created by the driver has no security descriptor (DACL) attached, so Windows applies effectively open access and any unprivileged process in the guest can open and interact with a facility that should be restricted to privileged or system callers. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:xen:windows_pv_drivers:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* - i.e. the Xen-supplied Windows guest driver package, independent of the specific Windows version.

Know when Windows Pv Drivers gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Sources disagree (Medium–Critical)
Vendor (XEN) PRIMARY 9.4 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Local unprivileged account required so AV:L/PR:L, no user interaction; missing ACL lets escalation cross from the driver into the guest OS (S:C) with full C/I/A loss.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
SUSE MEDIUM

vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.

CVSS VectorVendor: XEN

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]

The Windows PV drivers expose various facilities to userspace. Several of these have no security descriptor, and are therefore fully accessible to unprivileged users. These are:

  1. XenCons, CVE-2025-27462
  2. XenIface, CVE-2025-27463
  3. XenBus, CVE-2025-27464

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Xen Windows PV Drivers contain a critical local privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2025-27462, CVSS 9.4) in the XenCons console interface that allows any unprivileged guest user to achieve complete system compromise of affected Windows VMs. Organizations operating Windows workloads on Xen hypervisors are at immediate risk of VM hijacking with full data access, and the absence of a vendor patch means existing deployments lack a direct remediation path. Rapid inventory and containment of affected systems is required.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Unload or disable XenCons driver in guest VMs where the paravirtualized console is not operationally required; (2) Enforce Windows User Account Control (UAC) at maximum setting and disable SeLoadDriverPrivilege for non-administrators via Group Policy; (3) Implement privilege escalation monitoring via Windows Event Log (Audit Policy: Success/Failure for privilege use events); (4) Isolate affected critical guest VMs to dedicated hypervisor networks and restrict lateral movement capabilities; (5) Apply Microsoft OS hardening baselines (CIS Windows hardening, AppLocker driver execution policies) on vulnerable guests; (6) Subscribe to Citrix Security Advisory XSA-468 status and prepare emergency change windows for patch deployment upon release.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Xen guest drivers, common in some cloud and virtualization estates, not universal
Social Media
5
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor CIRCL VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

47
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +47
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS Not-Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy