Skip to main content

Undertow CVE-2022-2053

HIGH
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)
2022-08-05 secalert@redhat.com
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
Share

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY
7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVE Published
Aug 05, 2022 - 16:15 nvd
HIGH 7.5

Blast Radius

ecosystem impact
† from your stack dependencies † transitive graph · vuln.today resolves 4-path depth
  • 45 maven packages depend on io.undertow:undertow-core (9 direct, 36 indirect)

Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 2.3.0.Alpha1.

DescriptionNVD

When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2.

AnalysisAI

When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.

Technical ContextAI

This vulnerability is classified as Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400), which allows attackers to cause denial of service by exhausting system resources. When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2. Affected products include: Redhat Integration Camel K, Redhat Jboss Fuse, Redhat Undertow. Version information: up to 10.

RemediationAI

No vendor patch is available at time of analysis. Monitor vendor advisories for updates. Implement rate limiting, set resource quotas, validate input sizes, use timeouts.

CVE-2014-7816 MEDIUM POC
5.0 Dec 01

Directory traversal vulnerability in JBoss Undertow 1.0.x before 1.0.17, 1.1.x before 1.1.0.CR5, and 1.2.x before 1.2.0.

CVE-2020-1745 CRITICAL
9.8 Apr 28

A file inclusion vulnerability was found in the AJP connector enabled with a default AJP configuration port of 8009 in U

CVE-2019-10212 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 02

A flaw was found in, all under 2.0.20, in the Undertow DEBUG log for io.undertow.request.security. Rated critical severi

CVE-2019-3888 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 12

A vulnerability was found in Undertow web server before 2.0.21. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability i

CVE-2025-12543 CRITICAL
9.6 Jan 07

Undertow HTTP server (used in WildFly, JBoss EAP) fails to validate Host headers, enabling cache poisoning, internal net

CVE-2020-1757 HIGH
8.1 Apr 21

A flaw was found in all undertow-2.x.x SP1 versions prior to undertow-2.0.30.SP1, all undertow-1.x.x and undertow-2.x.x

CVE-2025-9784 HIGH
7.5 Sep 02

Undertow, a Java web server used across Red Hat's JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Fuse, and other middleware prod

CVE-2023-5379 HIGH
7.5 Dec 12

A flaw was found in Undertow. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authenticat

CVE-2023-3223 HIGH
7.5 Sep 27

A flaw was found in undertow. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authenticat

CVE-2023-1108 HIGH
7.5 Sep 14

A flaw was found in undertow. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authenticat

CVE-2022-1319 HIGH
7.5 Aug 31

A flaw was found in Undertow. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authenticat

CVE-2022-1259 HIGH
7.5 Aug 31

A flaw was found in Undertow. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authenticat

Share

CVE-2022-2053 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy