Skip to main content

Windows LSASS EUVDEUVD-2026-99441

| CVE-2026-83928 HIGH
Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CWE-306)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-g2gq-v46r-hjgc
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain network access to Windows host
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate with low-privilege foothold
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted request to LSASS
  4. Execution
    Trigger out-of-bounds write
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code in LSASS context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Authentication required for critical functions
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation targets the Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) over a network interface; the attacker must be able to reach the vulnerable LSASS-facing service on an unpatched Windows build (see EUVD affected ranges, e.g. Windows 11 24H2 <10.0.26100.9711, Server 2025 <10.0.26100.33650, down to Server 2012). Limiting factors: the CVSS vector specifies PR:L, so a low-privilege authenticated position appears required (though the description's 'unauthorized attacker'/CWE-306 wording contradicts this and should be confirmed with Microsoft); no user interaction is needed (UI:N) and complexity is low (AC:L). CISA SSVC marks the flaw non-automatable, indicating exploitation is not trivially scriptable at scale. The host must be unpatched - the fix is available from Microsoft.

Impact

This is a serious but not top-of-queue issue. The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a low-complexity network attack requiring only low privileges, with total CIA impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) in an unchanged scope, yielding 8.8 (High) - fitting for memory-corruption RCE in LSASS, a core Windows security process. However, exploitation signals are weak and partly conflicting: CISA's SSVC decision framework rates Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no' (Technical Impact 'total'), no CISA KEV listing is present, and no public PoC is indicated, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. A notable data conflict exists: the description calls this an 'unauthorized attacker' and the CWE is CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function), implying no credentials needed, yet the CVSS vector specifies PR:L (authenticated/low-privilege) - these cannot both be literally true, so the real privilege prerequisite should be verified against the Microsoft MSRC advisory. Net: treat as a high-priority patch target given ubiquity of Windows and total impact in LSASS, but current intelligence points to no active or automatable exploitation, making this an urgent-patch rather than emergency-exploitation scenario.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network reach to a Windows host's LSASS-exposed interface sends a crafted message that triggers an out-of-bounds write in LSASS, corrupting memory to achieve arbitrary code execution in this highly privileged security process. Per the CVSS vector this requires low complexity (AC:L) and, despite the 'unauthorized' wording, low privileges (PR:L) with no user interaction. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and CISA SSVC rates it non-automatable, suggesting any exploitation would be bespoke rather than commoditized.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

An out-of-bounds write in the Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) allows a network-positioned attacker to corrupt memory in a high-privilege system process and execute arbitrary code, with the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) indicating a low-privilege authenticated attacker, no user interaction, and full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The affected surface spans essentially the entire supported Windows fleet, from Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 and Windows 10 1607 through Windows 11 26H2 and Windows Server 2025, so unpatched domain controllers and member servers are the highest-value targets. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as none and the flaw as non-automatable, meaning exploitation is not trivial to script at scale; Microsoft has released fixed builds for all affected branches.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes for every affected branch and the primary action is to apply the current cumulative update that moves each host to or beyond its fixed build - for example 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.17763.9376 for Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809, 10.0.14393.9612 for Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607, 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 R2, 6.2.9200.26434 for Server 2012, 10.0.26100.9711 / 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 24H2 and 26H2, 10.0.26200.9711 for 25H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for 26H1, 10.0.22631.7652 for 23H2, and 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2; see https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83928 for the authoritative KB list. Prioritize domain controllers, servers exposing RPC/SMB/authentication endpoints, and any Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 systems still in service, since those are out of mainstream support and carry the longest exposure. Because the vector is AV:N/PR:L, exploitation requires network reachability plus a low-privilege foothold, so interim compensating controls are meaningful: restrict inbound access to LSASS-related RPC endpoints and to RPC ports 135/445 and the dynamic RPC range from untrusted network segments via host firewall and network ACLs, with the trade-off that legitimate remote management, domain authentication, and backup tooling may break if the rules are too broad; enforce credential hygiene and least privilege to remove the low-privilege authenticated foothold the vector requires; and consider Windows Defender Firewall or network-based detection to alert on anomalous LSASS crashes or SMB/RPC traffic from non-management hosts. Note that CISA SSVC marks the flaw non-automatable and with no observed exploitation, so this is a serious but not top-of-queue issue - patch on a normal prioritized cycle rather than under emergency change, while still treating unpatched domain controllers as high risk.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

LSASS is the Windows process that enforces security policy, handles authentication packages, and brokers credential and token operations for the operating system; because it runs with SYSTEM-level privileges and is reachable through network-facing authentication and RPC interfaces, memory corruption inside it is a direct path to full host compromise. The defect is an out-of-bounds write (memory-safety bug in parsing or handling of network-supplied data) that terminates in code execution under the LSASS process context. The supplied CWE is CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function), and NVD-style tags also classify this as a buffer overflow and authentication bypass; this is important because the CWE-306 framing and the description's phrase 'unauthorized attacker' sit in tension with the CVSS vector's PR:L, which implies a low-privilege authenticated position is required. That contradiction should be resolved against Microsoft's advisory before treating the flaw as pre-authentication; the practical consequence of either reading is the same - a remote, low-complexity, no-user-interaction bug that yields total impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) with scope unchanged (S:U), i.e. code running as LSASS rather than crossing a security boundary in the CVSS sense.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable LSASS memory-corruption RCE with low complexity; PR:L retained per vendor vector despite CWE-306/'unauthorized' wording, giving full CIA impact in unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds write in Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity memory corruption flaw in Windows LSASS - the authentication component present on virtually every supported Windows server and workstation in the estate - would allow an attacker who already holds a low-privilege account to potentially seize control of a system process running with domain-level privileges. Unpatched domain controllers and member servers are the highest-value targets, where a single successful compromise could cascade into credential theft and lateral movement across the environment. Microsoft has released fixes for all affected branches, so the exposure is fully remediable through standard patch operations rather than requiring architectural change.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 54% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
LSASS is a core component of every Windows client and server
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy