Skip to main content

Bookly EUVDEUVD-2026-96221

| CVE-2026-12626 HIGH
Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502)
2026-10-10 Wordfence GHSA-88vv-2m3v-gh9q
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as custom-level Bookly user
  2. Delivery
    Craft serialized PHP object payload
  3. Exploit
    Submit via 'value' parameter
  4. Execution
    Trigger untrusted deserialization
  5. Persist
    Invoke gadget chain methods
  6. Impact
    Achieve code execution or data compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated WordPress session with Bookly 'custom-level' role access or above, and submission of a serialized payload to the plugin's 'value' parameter, which is deserialized without validation in all versions up to and including 28.2. The decisive limiting factor is that no known gadget chain is available: successful code execution or data impact depends on a compatible gadget existing in another installed plugin, theme, or WordPress core, so default installations without such a gadget face injection without a direct exploit path. Secondary limits are the required authentication (not exploitable by anonymous visitors) and the version ceiling of 28.2.

Impact

This is a PHP Object Injection flaw (CWE-502) in the Bookly WordPress plugin, reported by Wordfence, carrying a vendor CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). The network vector and low attack complexity are offset by the PR:H requirement - exploitation requires an authenticated account. The description qualifies this as 'custom-level access and above,' which in Bookly's own role model is a relatively low-privilege staff/customer tier rather than full administrator, creating mild tension with the PR:H metric; this is worth verifying against the plugin's capability mapping, as the real barrier to entry may be lower than PR:H suggests. The most significant risk-dampening signal is explicit in the description: 'No known gadget chain is available.' Object injection alone does not yield code execution or data impact without a usable gadget chain (in Bookly, another installed plugin/theme, or WordPress core), so the C:H/I:H/A:H impact ratings represent the ceiling if a gadget is present rather than guaranteed outcomes. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public exploit was supplied in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. Net assessment: a genuine, patchable injection primitive that becomes high-severity only in environments where a reachable gadget chain exists; as a standalone issue it is a medium-priority, authenticated hardening fix rather than an emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds a custom-level (or higher) Bookly account submits a crafted serialized payload through the vulnerable 'value' parameter, causing the plugin to deserialize attacker-controlled input into a live PHP object. If a suitable gadget chain is present in the site's plugins, theme, or WordPress core, that object's lifecycle methods can be abused to read files, write data, or execute code; without such a chain the injection is currently inert. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and the advisory explicitly states no known gadget chain is available.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026

PHP Object Injection in the Bookly (Online Scheduling and Appointment Booking System) WordPress plugin, affecting all versions up to and including 28.2, lets authenticated users with Bookly 'custom-level' access or above pass a serialized payload through the plugin's 'value' parameter, which is then deserialized without validation; a successful chain could yield high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact. The decisive limiting factor is that no known gadget chain is available, so exploitation depends on a compatible gadget existing in another installed plugin, theme, or WordPress core, meaning default installations without such a gadget face injection without a direct exploit path. The flaw is not reachable by anonymous visitors (authentication required), and no public exploit code or CISA KEV entry has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upstream fix available (PR/commit); released patched version not independently confirmed - the WordPress plugin repository changeset at https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3707284/bookly-responsive-appointment-booking-tool documents the code correction, and administrators should apply the plugin update that supersedes 28.2 as soon as it appears in the WordPress dashboard, verifying the installed version afterward. Because the vulnerability is reachable only by authenticated users holding Bookly 'custom-level' access or above, an effective interim control is to audit and tightly restrict which accounts hold that role or higher (remove unnecessary custom-level, staff, and provider accounts, and enforce strong authentication), accepting the trade-off that legitimate staff workflows may be disrupted. If Bookly is not operationally required, deactivating and removing it eliminates exposure entirely; otherwise, a WAF rule that rejects serialized-object patterns (e.g., 'O:' followed by a length and class name) in requests to Bookly endpoints can raise the bar, though obfuscated encodings may bypass such signatures and false positives are possible on legitimate form data. Note that because no known gadget chain exists, blocking the specific injection parameter is a preventive measure against future gadget discovery rather than a response to observed exploitation, and blocking should be scoped to Bookly routes to avoid breaking other plugins.

Affected VersionsENISA

Online Scheduling and Appointment Booking System – Bookly 0 ≤28.2

Affected Packages

euvd online_scheduling_and_appointment_booking_system_bookly no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue is CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data): the plugin passes attacker-supplied input from the 'value' parameter into a PHP unserialize() (or equivalent) call without restricting allowed classes, allowing an authenticated user to inject arbitrary PHP objects into application state. PHP object injection by itself is not code execution - impact materializes only when a magic method (__wakeup, __destruct, __toString, __call) in some loaded class can be chained into a POP gadget chain that reaches a dangerous sink such as file write, SQL execution, or arbitrary method invocation. Because no known gadget chain has been identified in Bookly itself, the practical severity is conditional: it hinges on whether other plugins, the active theme, or WordPress core supply a compatible gadget in the same request context. The CPE data (cpe:2.3:a:ladela:online_scheduling_and_appointment_booking_system_-_bookly) confirms the vendor is Ladela and that the affected component is the Bookly scheduling/appointment booking plugin distributed through the WordPress plugin ecosystem. Vendor scoring is 7.2 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), while the independent assessment rates it 7.2-equivalent impact with PR:L, reflecting that 'custom-level' Bookly roles are low-privileged accounts rather than administrators.

Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable parameter with low complexity; PR:L reflects the low 'custom-level' Bookly role rather than admin, and object injection can yield full impact if a gadget chain exists.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

The Online Scheduling and Appointment Booking System - Bookly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 28.2 via deserialization of untrusted input via the ‘value’ parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with custom-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known gadget chain is available.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Bookly WordPress plugin, used for online scheduling and appointment booking, is affected by a high-severity vulnerability in versions up to and including 28.2 that could allow a user with elevated plugin permissions to compromise the website's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and exploitation is contingent on the presence of a compatible gadget chain from another installed component, meaning the risk is environment-specific but potentially severe where such a chain exists. Leadership should care because a successful attack could lead to data breaches, website defacement, or service outages, impacting customer trust and operational continuity.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting access to Bookly custom-level and above, implementing WAF rules to block serialized payloads, disabling the plugin if not business-critical, and monitoring logs for suspicious activity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular WordPress appointment-booking plugin, common but not universally deployed
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.

More in PHP

View all
CVE-2019-11043 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 28

In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it

CVE-2012-1823 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 11

sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not

CVE-2016-1555 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 21

(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear

CVE-2018-11138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 31

The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by

CVE-2024-11680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 26

ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C

CVE-2025-49113 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 02

Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au

CVE-2017-9841 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 27

Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c

CVE-2025-0108 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 12

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers

CVE-2021-25298 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2021-25296 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2013-4983 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 10

The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy