Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft forged settings-change request
-
ExploitTrick logged-in admin into clicking link
-
ExecutionBrowser submits request with admin session
-
ImpactPlugin setting altered without authorization
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the targeted WordPress site runs GDPR Data Request Form plugin version 1.7.1 or earlier, which lacks a CSRF nonce on the update handler for one specific setting. A site administrator must have an active authenticated session AND must be socially engineered into clicking an attacker-controlled link or visiting a malicious page (UI:R). Limiting factors: impact is confined to changing that single setting with no confidentiality or availability effect; the attack cannot run unattended because it depends on admin interaction and an existing logged-in session, making it targeted rather than mass-exploitable. |
| Impact | This is a low-to-moderate real-world risk despite the medium CVSS 4.3 score, and the signals are internally consistent. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) describes a network-reachable but user-interaction-dependent CSRF flaw: the attacker needs no privileges of their own (PR:N) but must trick an authenticated administrator into acting (UI:R), and the only impact is limited integrity (I:L) - no confidentiality or availability loss. A publicly available exploit exists (WPScan), which raises the reproducibility of the issue, but POC availability is not the same as active exploitation. No EPSS score was provided and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of widespread or automated exploitation; the attack is inherently targeted because it hinges on social-engineering a specific logged-in admin. No SSVC decision data was supplied. Net assessment: a genuine but constrained CSRF weakness affecting a single setting, appropriate for routine patching rather than emergency prioritization. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts or emails a page containing a forged request that targets the plugin's unprotected settings endpoint. While logged into WordPress, a site administrator is lured into clicking the link, and their browser silently submits the request, changing the affected plugin setting without the admin's intent. A public proof-of-concept from WPScan demonstrates the forged request. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 09, 2026
Missing CSRF protection in the GDPR Data Request Form WordPress plugin through 1.7.1 allows a remote attacker to change one plugin setting if they can trick a logged-in administrator into clicking a crafted link. Publicly available exploit code exists, but exploitation is targeted and requires an authenticated admin session plus user interaction, with impact limited to integrity of that single setting and no confidentiality or availability effect. This matches the assessed low-to-moderate real-world risk despite the CVSS 4.3 score.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is specified in the provided data; the affected range is stated as through 1.7.1, so check the WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/710ae5af-01bb-43e8-a853-df00a1ceacab/ and the plugin vendor for an update beyond 1.7.1 and apply it once available. If no patched version is available, disable the GDPR Data Request Form plugin on sites that do not require it, which removes the vulnerable update handler but also disables the form functionality. For sites that must keep it, enforce administrator session hygiene by logging out after administrative tasks and avoiding untrusted sites while authenticated, and consider a WAF or reverse-proxy rule that requires a valid CSRF nonce or blocks cross-origin POST requests to the plugin's settings-update endpoint; note that such rules can break legitimate admin updates and are not equivalent to a nonce. Also restrict administrator accounts to trusted users and review the affected setting after any suspicious admin browsing.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected technology is a WordPress plugin, where state-changing administrative actions are normally protected by WordPress nonces and capability checks. The missing nonce on the handler that updates one GDPR Data Request Form setting is a cross-site request forgery weakness, commonly mapped to CWE-352 even though no CWE was supplied in the input. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:unknown:gdpr_data_request_form:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the plugin as the affected component, with the advisory covering versions through 1.7.1. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N shows the request is reachable over the network without attacker authentication, but the victim administrator must be induced to interact, and the resulting impact is a low-integrity change only.
Know when Gdpr Data Request Form gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CSRF needs no attacker privileges (PR:N) but requires tricking an authenticated admin (UI:R); only a single setting is altered, so integrity is low and confidentiality/availability are unaffected.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
DescriptionCVE.org
The GDPR Data Request Form WordPress plugin through 1.7.1 does not have CSRF protection when updating one of its settings, allowing attackers to change that setting via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.
EUVD-2026-95706
GHSA-25mp-f6qq-hg3f
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB