Skip to main content

WPComplete EUVDEUVD-2026-94929

| CVE-2026-66479 HIGH
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (CWE-352)
2026-10-08 Patchstack GHSA-vhxj-w8cf-84xv
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure authenticated WP user to page
  2. Delivery
    Browser auto-submits forged CSRF request
  3. Exploit
    Malicious script stored via WPComplete
  4. Execution
    Stored XSS executes in admin browser
  5. Impact
    Session hijack or privilege abuse

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a victim who is an authenticated, privileged WordPress user (e.g., an administrator or user able to persist WPComplete data) to be tricked into visiting an attacker-controlled page or link while their session is active - this is the UI:R user-interaction requirement and the core limiting factor. The attacker needs no credentials of their own (PR:N) but cannot act without the victim's browser submitting the forged request; the flaw stems from missing or inadequate CSRF nonce/token validation on a WPComplete action that writes data later rendered without proper output encoding, enabling the stored XSS. Realistic risk is bounded by the need for social engineering of a logged-in privileged user and by the plugin being installed and active on the target WordPress site (versions up to and including 2.9.5.6).

Impact

This is a moderate-priority issue rather than a critical emergency. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 (vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) reflects a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw requiring no attacker privileges but mandating victim user interaction (UI:R) - characteristic of a CSRF attack where a forged request must be triggered by a logged-in victim. The scope change (S:C) and low confidentiality/integrity/availability impacts are consistent with the stored-XSS payload executing in a different security context (the browser) than the vulnerable component. No EPSS score, KEV listing, POC, or SSVC decision data was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The practical risk is gated by the UI:R requirement: an attacker cannot exploit this autonomously but must lure an authenticated/privileged WordPress user to a malicious page. The reliance on tricking a privileged user, combined with a niche plugin footprint, means this is a real but not widespread or automatable threat - prioritize patching for sites running WPComplete, but it does not warrant the same urgency as an unauthenticated, no-interaction RCE.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious web page or email containing a forged request targeting a WordPress site running WPComplete. When an authenticated administrator or privileged user visits that page while logged in, the browser automatically submits the forged request, causing a malicious script to be stored in the plugin's data. The stored XSS payload then executes whenever the affected content is rendered. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting can be planted on WordPress sites running the WPComplete plugin through version 2.9.5.6, because a WPComplete write action is performed without adequate CSRF nonce validation (CWE-352) and the stored value is later rendered without sufficient output encoding. Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) the attacker needs no credentials of their own, but exploitation requires tricking a logged-in, privileged WordPress user into visiting an attacker-controlled page or link while their session is active, which is the primary limiting factor. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, and the net effect is a moderate-priority risk: injected script executes in the site context (scope changed) and can affect other users, but impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability is each rated Low.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is confirmed in the available intelligence, so treat any remediation as compensating control work until a fixed WPComplete release is published and validated. The most effective immediate step is to deactivate and, if unused, remove the WPComplete plugin from any WordPress site where completion tracking is not essential; the trade-off is loss of the plugin's course/progress-tracking functionality. If the plugin must stay active, restrict access to the WordPress admin area (IP allowlisting, HTTP auth on /wp-admin and admin-ajax.php), and enforce SameSite=Lax or Strict on WordPress session cookies, accepting that stricter SameSite settings can break legitimate cross-site flows and some SSO or embedded integrations. Deploy WAF or reverse-proxy rules that reject cross-origin state-changing POSTs to admin-ajax.php/admin-post.php lacking a valid nonce or matching referer; expect false positives against legitimate admin traffic and tune before enforcing. Because the sink is stored XSS, a Content-Security-Policy with restrictive script-src also reduces execution, though WordPress admin frequently needs inline scripts and may require nonce-based CSP. Monitor the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wpcomplete/vulnerability/wordpress-wpcomplete-plugin-2-9-5-6-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability and the plugin's WordPress.org page for a patched release, and upgrade immediately once an exact fixed version is published.

Affected VersionsENISA

WPComplete 0 ≤2.9.5.6

Affected Packages

euvd wpcomplete no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a cross-site request forgery (CWE-352) in the WordPress plugin WPComplete, published by Liquid Web / StellarWP. WordPress plugins typically gate state-changing actions with nonces (wp_verify_nonce / check_admin_referer) and capability checks; here that protection is missing or inadequate on an action that persists attacker-supplied data through the victim's authenticated session. That persisted value is then emitted into an administrative or front-end page without proper escaping, converting the CSRF into stored XSS - a chained weakness where the CSRF provides the write primitive and the absent output encoding provides script execution. Because the CVSS vector uses S:C, the injected script runs with the privileges of the hosting site's origin and can act against other users of that site rather than being confined to the attacker's own origin. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:liquid_web_/_stellarwp:wpcomplete:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all releases of the plugin up to and including 2.9.5.6, so any site with that plugin active in the affected range is exposed, independent of theme or other plugins.

Know when Wpcomplete gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 7.1 HIGH

Network-delivered CSRF needing a logged-in victim's interaction, so AV:N/PR:N/UI:R; stored XSS runs in a different context giving S:C with low C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Liquid Web / StellarWP WPComplete wpcomplete allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WPComplete: from n/a through 2.9.5.6.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

WordPress sites running the WPComplete plugin (versions through 2.9.5.6) are exposed to a stored cross-site scripting flaw in which an unauthenticated attacker can plant malicious script via a write action that lacks CSRF validation, with the payload later executing in the browsers of logged-in users who view the affected content. Because no vendor fix is currently available and success only requires luring a privileged WordPress user to a crafted page or link, administrators, editors, and authenticated visitors could have sessions or content compromised. Leadership should treat this as a high-priority website integrity issue until the component is updated, removed, or otherwise mitigated, especially for customer-facing or high-traffic WordPress properties.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: deactivate or remove WPComplete (through version 2.9.5.6) where it is not essential; restrict plugin write actions to trusted roles; deploy WAF rules targeting CSRF and XSS patterns; enforce a Content Security Policy; and limit privileged-user session exposure to untrusted links.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 100% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress course/lesson-completion plugin, limited deployment footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy