Skip to main content

Android Settings EUVDEUVD-2026-92630

| CVE-2026-28648 HIGH
Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') (CWE-441)
2026-10-05 google_android GHSA-w2mx-4m2p-6jwj
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: google_android
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Install malicious low-privilege app
  2. Exploit
    Invoke Settings confused-deputy path
  3. Execution
    Settings performs privileged action unchecked
  4. Impact
    Escalate to elevated device privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service Proxy/intermediary controls
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an attacker-controlled process already running locally on the device with at least low privilege (CVSS PR:L) - typically a malicious or compromised installed application - which then abuses a specific permission-check flaw in the Android Settings component (a confused deputy, CWE-441) to have Settings perform a privileged operation on the caller's behalf. No user interaction is required (UI:N) and no additional execution privileges are needed, but the local-only vector (AV:L) means remote or network exploitation is NOT possible; the attacker must first achieve code execution on the device. Confirmed-affected builds are Android 14, 15, 16, and 16-qpr2; the sole advisory is the Android Automotive OS bulletin, so whether all Android variants or primarily AAOS deployments are exposed should be verified with Google.

Impact

This is a genuine but second-tier priority: a local privilege-escalation flaw in the Android Settings component arising from a confused-deputy pattern (CWE-441), where a more-privileged component acts on behalf of a lower-privileged caller. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) signals a local attack vector with low complexity, requiring some existing privilege (PR:L) but no user interaction, yielding total compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the device. These signals are internally consistent - local vector matches the 'local escalation of privilege' description, and PR:L matches the need for an already-installed low-privilege app. However, the real-world-exploitation signals point DOWN, not up: SSVC records Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no' (consistent with a local PE that cannot be worm-driven across a network), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code was identified. SSVC Technical Impact of 'total' aligns with the high C/I/A. No EPSS score was provided, so the quantitative exploitation probability is UNKNOWN and could not be weighed. Net: high technical impact but gated behind local access and existing privilege, with no evidence of exploitation - treat as a routine high-severity patch-cycle item rather than an emergency. One data discrepancy to verify: the sole vendor reference is the Android Automotive OS (AAOS) October 2026 bulletin, yet the CPE and affected-version list describe general Android - confirm whether this affects all Android builds or primarily AAOS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A malicious or compromised low-privilege app already installed on the device invokes the Settings component in a way that causes Settings (the 'deputy') to perform a privileged action on the attacker's behalf, bypassing a permission check. Because no user interaction is required and the local attack complexity is low, the app silently escalates to elevated privileges and gains full control over device data and functions. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and SSVC records no observed exploitation.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Android Settings component lets an attacker-controlled application that is already running on the device with low privileges (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) abuse a confused-deputy permission check and cause the more-privileged Settings process to perform operations on the caller's behalf, delivering high confidentiality and integrity impact with no user interaction required. Confirmed-affected builds are Android 14, Android 15, Android 16, and Android 16-qpr2, and the only vendor reference provided is the Android Automotive OS security bulletin for 2026-10-01, so the breadth of exposure across Android form factors should be confirmed with Google. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and CISA's SSVC evaluation records exploitation as none, so this is a genuine but second-tier, local-only escalation path rather than a remotely reachable or actively exploited issue.

RemediationAI

Patch status: patch available per vendor advisory - apply the Android security update carrying the fix distributed through the bulletin at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/aaos/2026/2026-10-01; the provided data does not enumerate a specific patch build identifier, so administrators should adopt the bulletin's stated security patch level or later for Android 14, 15, 16, and 16-qpr2 devices and confirm coverage with the OEM. Where immediate patching is not possible, the effective compensating controls all reduce the prerequisite of a hostile locally installed app: enforce Google Play Protect verification and disable installation from unknown sources (trade-off: blocks legitimate sideloading and enterprise-side-loaded builds), restrict the managed device app catalogue through an Enterprise Mobility Management allowlist (trade-off: ongoing curation overhead and possible blocking of needed line-of-business apps), and monitor for anomalous app-initiated Settings activity or abuse of accessibility and other delegated-permission surfaces (trade-off: noisy telemetry and false positives). Note that network-perimeter controls such as blocking ports or restricting endpoints are ineffective here because the vector is local (AV:L) and no user interaction (UI:N) is required; no public exploit code exists, so exploitation pressure is currently low, but the vulnerability should be prioritised alongside other fixable local privilege-escalation findings in the same bulletin.

Affected VersionsENISA

Android 16-qpr2
Android 14
Android 16
Android 15

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic confused-deputy pattern (CWE-441) inside the Android Settings application, which on Android is a privileged system component holding permissions that ordinary third-party apps cannot obtain. A lower-privileged caller - in practice a malicious or compromised app already installed on the device - can invoke a Settings entry point whose permission check validates the wrong party, so Settings executes the sensitive action using its own authority while the real requesting app remains unprivileged. This yields privilege escalation with no additional execution privileges required and no user interaction (UI:N), but the attack vector is strictly local (AV:L), meaning the adversary must first achieve local code execution and can never reach this over the network. The CPE record cpe:2.3:a:google:android:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is a wildcard and does not itself pin affected builds; version scoping comes from EUVD-2026-92630, which lists Android 14, 15, 16, and 16-qpr2, and from the Android Automotive OS bulletin referenced under source.android.com, which is the sole advisory in the dataset and suggests the fix may be published primarily in the AAOS track.

Know when Android gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (google_android) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local confused-deputy PE needs an installed low-privilege app (AV:L, PR:L), no user interaction (UI:N), low complexity, and the vendor describes total device compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H).

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (google_android).

CVSS VectorVendor: google_android

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Oct 06, 2026 - 14:22 NVD
7.8 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 05, 2026 - 18:39 cve.org
HIGH 7.8
CVE Published
Oct 05, 2026 - 18:39 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

In Settings, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

An unpatched local privilege escalation flaw in the Android Settings component affects Android 14, 15, 16, and 16-qpr2 builds, allowing a low-privileged app already installed on a device to make the more-privileged Settings process act on its behalf and gain access to sensitive data and settings. Because no vendor fix is currently available, every managed Android handset, tablet, and Automotive OS deployment in our fleet running these versions remains exposed until Google ships a patch. Leadership should care because remediation depends entirely on vendor timing, and our only lever in the interim is tighter control over what applications reach employee and customer devices.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce managed Google Play allowlisting and block sideloading or unknown-source installs; enable and monitor Google Play Protect and mobile threat defense; restrict developer options and USB debugging on managed devices; segment or isolate high-value Automotive OS and executive devices; monitor for anomalous Settings-process activity and unexpected permission grants until the vendor fix ships.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Android OS runs on billions of consumer and embedded devices worldwide
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

CVE-2015-3105 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 10

Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466

CVE-2015-3864 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 01

Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A

CVE-2013-4710 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 03

Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp

CVE-2015-1538 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 01

Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef

CVE-2024-21633 HIGH POC
7.8 Jan 03

Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK

CVE-2017-13156 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 06

An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability

CVE-2016-2107 MEDIUM POC
5.9 May 05

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a

CVE-2015-3106 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 10

Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows

CVE-2015-3107 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 10

Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows

CVE-2013-4787 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 09

Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows

CVE-2014-7911 HIGH
7.2 Dec 15

luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.

CVE-2016-0801 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 07

The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy