Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain privileged CLI account on appliance
-
DeliveryInvoke certificate SMIME recipient deletion command
-
ExploitInject shell metacharacters into recipient argument
-
ExecutionCommand executes as root
-
ImpactFull OS control of Guardium appliance
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated user with a privileged CLI role on IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, who must reach the appliance's command-line interface (typically SSH-accessible management access). The specific trigger is the CLI certificate S/MIME recipient deletion functionality, where unsanitized input allows shell command injection executed with root privileges. Limiting factors: high-privilege authentication is mandatory (PR:H), the flaw is confined to a specific certificate/S-MIME CLI code path, and it affects the 12.2 build; there is no unauthenticated or user-interaction-free path. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but access-gated privilege escalation issue rather than a mass-exploitation threat. The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 7.2 High) requires PR:H - an already-authenticated, privileged CLI user - which is the dominant limiting factor: the attacker must already hold high-privilege CLI credentials on the Guardium appliance. Given that starting point, the payoff is full command execution as root (C:H/I:H/A:H), so it functions primarily as a privilege-boundary escape (privileged-CLI-role → underlying OS root) rather than an initial-access vector. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so per the precision rules this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - there is no evidence of active exploitation or automatable mass exploitation. One tension worth verifying: the vector lists AV:N (network), which is consistent with the CLI being reachable over SSH, but the impact is essentially a local root escape from an authenticated administrative context - treat 'network' as 'the management CLI is network-reachable,' not as unauthenticated remote code execution. A patch is available from IBM, making remediation straightforward. Net: real priority for organizations running the affected build because the outcome is root, but the PR:H prerequisite keeps real-world risk well below what the raw 7.2 might suggest for an unauthenticated flaw. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated user holding a privileged CLI role on an IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 appliance (e.g., a rogue or compromised administrator account) invokes the certificate S/MIME recipient deletion command and embeds shell metacharacters in the recipient argument, causing the appliance to execute attacker-supplied commands as root. This lets a bounded CLI operator break out of the restricted management shell to full OS control. No public exploit code was identified, and successful exploitation depends on already possessing privileged CLI access. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 29, 2026
Command injection in the IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 CLI certificate S/MIME recipient deletion routine allows an authenticated user holding a privileged CLI role to execute arbitrary shell commands with root privileges on the appliance. The flaw sits in a specific certificate/S/MIME management code path and requires high-privilege authentication plus interactive access to the command-line interface, so it is best characterized as an access-gated privilege escalation and post-compromise escalation primitive rather than a mass-exploitation threat. Patch status is "Patch available per vendor advisory" (IBM support page node/7288034); no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS score was supplied with the intelligence feed.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released fix for CVE-2026-84422 referenced in IBM's support advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288034 (patch status: "Patch available per vendor advisory"); the feed does not disclose an exact fix build number, so confirm the target version against that advisory before upgrading Guardium Data Protection 12.2. Until the appliance is patched, the highest-value compensating control is to tightly restrict which accounts hold privileged CLI roles on the Guardium appliance and to limit CLI reachability to a hardened management network or bastion, since the vulnerability requires high-privilege authentication and network access to the command-line interface - the trade-off is reduced operator convenience and a greater reliance on jump-host workflows. Audit and prune privileged CLI users who do not need certificate/S-MIME administration rights, and enable CLI command logging and alerting on invocations of the S/MIME recipient deletion function so attempted injection is visible; logging alone does not prevent exploitation, but it is effective for detection when the patch cannot be deployed immediately. Because exploitation yields root on the appliance, any suspected use should be treated as full host compromise requiring credential rotation and forensic review rather than simple reconfiguration.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, in the CLI handler that deletes S/MIME certificate recipients within Guardium Data Protection's certificate management subsystem. User-supplied recipient identifiers are passed to a shell invocation without adequate sanitization, and because the CLI service operates with root privileges, any injected command inherits that privilege level, giving full control of the underlying appliance operating system. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms a network-reachable attack surface with low complexity and no user interaction, but gated behind high privileges (PR:H); impact is complete across confidentiality, integrity, and availability with unchanged scope, meaning the compromised component can affect the host's own security context and data rather than propagating to other security authorities. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, but the vendor description and advisory scope the issue to the 12.2 release, and CWE-78 is a well-understood injection class where the correct fix is argument-level sanitization or avoidance of shell interpretation entirely.
Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable management CLI so AV:N; requires an already-privileged CLI account so PR:H; injection yields deterministic root command execution giving C:H/I:H/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorVendor: ibm
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the CLI certificate SMIME recipient deletion functionality, allowing an authenticated privileged CLI user to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 contains a high-severity command injection flaw that permits users with privileged CLI access to execute arbitrary commands as root on the appliance. This could lead to full compromise of a critical data security system, potentially exposing sensitive information and disrupting compliance monitoring. Leadership should prioritize remediation because the appliance is central to data protection and regulatory compliance.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
More in Guardium Data Protection
View allSQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma
Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang
Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app
Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers
Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2
Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac
Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen
Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent
Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c
A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u
Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL
EUVD-2026-89196
GHSA-74xm-h993-44w4
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB