Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection EUVDEUVD-2026-89194

| CVE-2026-84436 CRITICAL
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-09-29 ibm GHSA-6796-7r89-5367
9.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to Guardium CLI as privileged user
  2. Delivery
    Invoke certificate export command
  3. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters into argument
  4. Execution
    Command executes as root
  5. Impact
    Full appliance compromise and data access

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated, privileged CLI user account on IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 (PR:H) invoking the certificate export CLI function; the injected command executes with root privileges, escaping the restricted CLI shell (scope change). LIMITING FACTORS: exploitation is gated behind privileged CLI authentication - this is not reachable by anonymous or low-privilege network users - and is specific to the certificate export command path on the 12.2 CLI. No user interaction by a second party is required (UI:N).

Impact

The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.1 Critical) is dominated by the scope change and full CIA impact: a privileged CLI user escapes the restricted management shell to run arbitrary commands as root. However, PR:H is the decisive limiter - exploitation requires an already-authenticated, privileged CLI account, so this is a privilege-escalation / restricted-shell-escape primitive rather than a pre-auth remote takeover. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the provided data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the 9.1 reflects worst-case technical impact, not real-world exploitation likelihood. Net: real priority for hardening because it defeats the CLI privilege boundary and yields root, but the high-privilege precondition means realistic risk is confined to environments where CLI access is granted to semi-trusted operators or where a lower-privilege foothold already exists. AV:N is credible because the Guardium CLI is typically reached over SSH, but the flaw is functionally an authenticated administrative-interface bug - verify who holds CLI credentials in your deployment before rating urgency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An operator or contractor holding privileged CLI access to a Guardium Data Protection 12.2 appliance (or an attacker who has phished/reused such credentials) invokes the certificate export CLI command with a maliciously crafted argument that breaks out into a shell command. The injected payload executes with root privileges, giving full control of the appliance and the sensitive database-activity-monitoring data it holds. No public POC is identified at time of analysis.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 29, 2026

Command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an authenticated, highly privileged CLI user to execute arbitrary operating-system commands as root, escaping the restricted certificate-export shell (scope change) and fully compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The flaw is CWE-78 (OS command injection) in the certificate export CLI path and carries a vendor CVSS 3.1 score of 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). Exploitation is gated behind privileged CLI authentication, and no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; IBM has released a vendor patch.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the IBM fix published at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288040, which is the authoritative remediation for Guardium Data Protection 12.2. Until the patch can be deployed, reduce the attack surface by restricting CLI access to the smallest possible set of trusted administrators and removing unused or shared privileged CLI accounts; because the flaw is gated behind privileged CLI authentication, limiting who can invoke certificate export commands directly reduces exposure. Enable auditing and alerting on certificate-export CLI invocations and on unexpected root-level child processes spawned from the Guardium CLI, and consider a break-glass procedure for legitimate certificate-management workflows so tighter CLI restrictions do not block operations. Network-level controls that limit reachability of the Guardium management CLI (management VLAN segmentation, jump hosts, ACLs) can add defense in depth, but they do not fix the underlying injection and carry the trade-off of complicating legitimate administrative access.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a classic OS command injection (CWE-78) in IBM Guardium Data Protection's certificate export CLI functionality, where user-supplied input is incorporated into a shell command without adequate sanitization or escaping. Guardium Data Protection is a database activity monitoring and data-security platform whose administrative CLI is normally a restricted shell intended to limit operators to a defined command set; because the certificate export routine invokes a system command with root privileges, a privileged CLI user can break out of the restricted context and run arbitrary commands as root. The CVSS scope change (S:C) reflects that the vulnerable component is the Guardium CLI while the impacted component is the underlying host operating system. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* maps the Guardium Data Protection product family without a version qualifier, though the vendor advisory specifically addresses version 12.2.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 9.1 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.1 CRITICAL

CLI reached over SSH (AV:N), deterministic injection (AC:L), requires privileged CLI account (PR:H), and breakout from restricted shell to root is a scope change with full CIA impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the certificate export CLI functionality, allowing a privileged authenticated CLI user to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, a platform widely used to monitor and audit access to sensitive databases, contains a critical command-injection flaw in its certificate-export command-line interface that allows an already highly privileged CLI user to execute commands as root and escape the restricted shell entirely, with full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected appliance. Because these systems hold audit trails and database activity records used to demonstrate regulatory compliance, a compromise could allow an insider or a stolen privileged credential to silently disable monitoring, exfiltrate captured data, or falsify the evidence leadership depends on. The exposure is limited to organizations running the affected version and to accounts with high-privilege CLI access, so the practical risk is concentrated in a small but trusted population of administrators rather than the general user base.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 50% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise database activity monitoring appliance, common in regulated industries not everywhere
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

47
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

CVE-2026-80441 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy