Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessUnknown access vector
-
ExploitUnknown vulnerability trigger
-
ImpactUnknown impact
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation conditions cannot be determined - the description is unavailable and no CVSS metrics are provided, so no product feature, protocol, configuration setting, or deployment mode can be named. Authentication requirements are not confirmed from available data. The only known fact is that the issue was reported via Ubuntu, suggesting it affects an Ubuntu-packaged component; the specific package, enabling configuration, and limiting factors must be obtained from the Ubuntu Security Notice for CVE-2026-95296. |
| Impact | Risk cannot be meaningfully assessed from the provided data. The description is '[Unknown description]', there is no CVSS score or vector, no CWE, no EPSS probability, no KEV listing, and no POC indicator - the only signal is that the CVE was reported by 'vendor:ubuntu' (i.e. it likely corresponds to an Ubuntu Security Notice / USN for a packaged open-source component). With no attack vector, complexity, privilege, or impact metrics available, it is impossible to distinguish a genuine priority from a low-real-risk issue. All exploitation-related signals are MISSING: no active-exploitation evidence (KEV absent, but absence is not confirmation of non-exploitation), no public exploit identified, and no SSVC decision data. Any severity claim here would be fabricated. Recommendation: retrieve the actual Ubuntu USN / NVD record for CVE-2026-95296 to obtain the affected package, version range, CVSS vector, and CWE before triage. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | No exploit scenario can be constructed because the vulnerability class, affected product, and attack vector are all unknown. No public exploit has been identified in the provided data. Consult the corresponding Ubuntu Security Notice for the affected package and technical details. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 24, 2026
CVE-2026-95296 currently has no published description, no CVSS score, no CWE classification, and no CPE identifiers; the only intelligence signal available is that it was reported through the Ubuntu vendor channel, indicating the flaw resides in a component packaged, shipped, or maintained within an Ubuntu release. Because the affected package, version range, exposed feature, and attack path are all unidentified, no impact statement can be made and risk cannot be meaningfully assessed from the provided data. There is no evidence of active exploitation (no CISA KEV entry was supplied) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch information was included in the provided intelligence, so patch status is undetermined rather than confirmed absent. The primary action is to monitor and consume the Ubuntu fix: check https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-95296 for the package and release table, subscribe to the ubuntu-security-announce list and to USN notifications at https://ubuntu.com/security/notices, and query the local system with 'pro fix CVE-2026-95296' (or 'pro fix --dry-run CVE-2026-95296') on Ubuntu Pro-enabled hosts and 'ubuntu-security-status' on standard hosts to see whether an update applies to the installed package set. Applying updates normally (apt update && apt full-upgrade) will pull the fixed package once published; if unattended-upgrades is used, note the trade-off that security updates may restart affected services, so schedule maintenance windows or configure service-specific restart policies. Because the vulnerable package is unknown, no targeted compensating control can be recommended - disabling a feature, blocking a port, or restricting an endpoint would be guesswork, and any generic hardening such as network segmentation or tightening firewall rules carries cost without confirmed benefit for this specific issue. Where an affected host cannot be patched promptly, the only defensible interim measure is reducing exposure of the unidentified component by limiting who can reach the service, accepting the operational impact of that restriction, and prioritizing the host for patching as soon as the USN identifies the package and fixed version.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The underlying technology, library, or protocol involved cannot be determined from the available data. No CWE was assigned in the supplied intelligence, so the root-cause class - whether memory corruption, input validation failure, privilege management error, or logic flaw - is unknown. No CPE strings were provided, which means the exact affected package, upstream project, and version boundaries cannot be mapped to a product identity. The single attribution, 'vendor:ubuntu', places this CVE within the Ubuntu security ecosystem: Ubuntu tracks CVEs for packages in main and universe, publishes Ubuntu Security Notices (USNs) when fixes ship, and backports patches to supported releases including LTS versions under standard maintenance and to older releases under Ubuntu Pro/ESM. In that model, the upstream project may not be Ubuntu itself but a third-party component that Ubuntu packages, meaning the definitive technical detail will come from the Ubuntu CVE tracker entry and its linked USN rather than from the CVE record. Until that tracker entry is enriched with a package name, affected version set, and patch state, any statement about exploitable code paths, protocol exposure, or privilege requirements would be speculation.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Sources disagree (Medium–Critical)AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.
CVSS VectorVendor: vendor:ubuntu
DescriptionCVE.org
[Unknown description]
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Same weakness CWE-862 – Missing Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Tumbleweed | Fixed |
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-89165
GHSA-jxq8-c8p7-9vrc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB