Skip to main content

Grav CMS EUVDEUVD-2026-87764

| CVE-2026-100670 HIGH
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639)
2026-09-26 VulnCheck GHSA-xw59-q7ph-pgh5
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as backend operator with admin.users
  2. Delivery
    Open flex accounts editor
  3. Exploit
    Submit flat key access.admin.super
  4. Execution
    Guard bypass survives filterArray and flattening
  5. Persist
    setNestedProperty writes admin.super
  6. Impact
    Full super-admin over CMS

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Object-level authorization, IDOR prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated backend account on the Grav 2.0 flex accounts backend that already holds the admin.users permission but not admin.super - i.e., a delegated/sub-administrator. Exploitation uses the group or account blueprints and depends on the version-specific flat-key handling present in 2.0.14 through 2.0.24; installs on 2.0.25+ or on older 1.x lines outside this range are not affected. What limits exploitation: the attacker must already have privileged (though non-super) backend access, so this is an insider or post-compromise privilege-escalation vector rather than a remote unauthenticated one; no user interaction is required.

Impact

This is a genuine, high-value privilege escalation, not a high-CVSS-but-low-real-risk issue. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H, score 8.7) is well-supported: the attack is network-reachable through the standard flex-accounts backend, has low complexity (a single crafted flat-key form submission), needs no user interaction, and yields full super-admin control over configuration, plugin/theme installation, the file manager, and all accounts. The only meaningful gate is PR:L - the attacker must already be an authenticated backend operator holding admin.users. No EPSS score, KEV entry, or public POC is present in the provided data, so exploitation status is: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. There is no conflict between the CVSS vector and the description - both agree on authenticated network access. The main caveat is that the impact is contingent on an insider or a compromised sub-admin account rather than a fully unauthenticated attacker, which lowers the population of realistic attackers even though technical impact is total. Net: real priority for any Grav 2.0 deployment with delegated (non-super) admin accounts.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A backend operator granted only admin.users (e.g., a delegated account manager) opens the flex accounts editor and submits a flat dot-notation key such as access.admin.super=true for their own account or a group they belong to. The blueprint's security@ admin.super guard resolves only the exact nested path and never matches the flattened key, so it survives filtering and is reconstructed into the nested access map on save, promoting the operator to full super-admin. No public exploit code is identified, but the technique is fully described and trivially reproducible.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 26, 2026

Privilege escalation in Grav CMS 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 allows an authenticated backend operator who already holds the admin.users permission - but not admin.super - to grant super-admin rights to their own account or to a group they belong to via the flex accounts backend. The bypass works because the security guard is resolved against a field's exact blueprint path, so a crafted flat dot-notation key such as access.admin.super evades the rule match and is later reconstructed into a genuine nested value when the object is saved. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and because the attacker must already possess privileged but non-super backend access, this is an insider or post-compromise escalation vector rather than a remote unauthenticated one - but the resulting super-admin control over configuration, plugin and theme installation, the file manager, and all accounts makes it a genuine, high-value escalation rather than a high-CVSS-but-low-real-risk issue.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade Grav CMS to 2.0.25 or later, which drops any dotted key whose ancestor path is disabled or marked validate.ignore and thereby closes the flat-key bypass; because the flaw is in how the account and group blueprints are filtered, the upgrade is the only complete fix and no configuration toggle restores the guard. Until upgrading is possible, treat the compensating controls as risk reduction rather than a fix: audit stored account and group definitions (the flex accounts backend YAML) for anomalous flat keys such as access.admin.super and remove them, understanding that a determined operator can simply re-inject the key; restrict the admin.users permission to a minimal set of trusted operators so the pool of accounts able to reach the flex accounts backend is as small as possible, accepting that this reduces but does not eliminate insider risk and may disrupt delegated administration workflows; and monitor backend audit logs for permission changes on accounts or groups that grant super-admin rights, acknowledging that detection is after-the-fact and only useful if the write path is logged and reviewed. The vendor advisory at https://github.com/getgrav/grav/security/advisories/GHSA-mwjj-r7vm-pgqm should be consulted for any vendor-supplied mitigation guidance accompanying the 2.0.25 release.

Affected VersionsENISA

grav 0 <2.0.25

Affected Packages

euvd grav fix: 2.0.25

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Grav stores its access-control model in blueprint definitions, and the group and account blueprints gate sensitive permissions with a security@: admin.super guard. That guard is matched by the field's exact path within the blueprint schema, so it only catches keys presented in their canonical nested form (access[admin][super]). When an authenticated operator submits a flat dot-notation key such as access.admin.super instead, no blueprint rule matches the path, and the value survives BlueprintSchema::filterArray() and the subsequent flattening step. On write, FlexObject::update() passes the surviving key to setNestedProperty(), which splits the string on '.' and rebuilds the nested structure - effectively materializing access.admin.super as legitimate configuration. The root cause is CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key): user-controlled key naming determines whether an authorization guard fires, rather than the authorization decision being driven by the resulting privilege set. This is a version-specific behavior present only in the 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 releases, which is why the fix in 2.0.25 explicitly drops any dotted key whose ancestor path is disabled or marked validate.ignore. The CPE record for the vendor (cpe:2.3:a:getgrav:grav) is version-wildcarded, so the precise exposure window comes from the vendor advisory and the EUVD range (grav 0 < 2.0.25) rather than from CPE version matching.

Know when Grav gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable backend with low-complexity flat-key submission; PR:L because a delegated admin.users account is required; escalation to super-admin yields full C/I/A within the same application (S:U).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 26, 2026 - 14:02 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 26, 2026 - 13:23 cve.org
HIGH 8.7

DescriptionCVE.org

Grav CMS 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the group and account blueprints. The access map is gated by a security@: admin.super guard that is resolved by the field's exact path, so a submitted flat dot-notation key such as access.admin.super (instead of the nested access[admin][super]) matches no blueprint rule, survives BlueprintSchema::filterArray() and flattening, and is written by FlexObject::update() via setNestedProperty(), which splits on . and reconstructs the nested value. An authenticated backend operator using the flex accounts backend who holds admin.users but not admin.super can therefore grant admin.super to their own account or to a group they belong to and escalate to full super-admin, gaining control over configuration, plugin and theme installation, the file manager, and all accounts. Fixed in 2.0.25, which drops any dotted key whose ancestor path is disabled or marked validate.ignore.

Technical POC Analysis

CWE-639 (authorization bypass through user-controlled key), per the CVE metadata; the advisory itself lists no CWE, and the mechanism is more precisely a path-resolution/authorization-logic mismatch…

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Grav CMS versions 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 contain a high-severity privilege escalation flaw that allows a backend operator with limited administrative rights to grant themselves super-admin control. Organizations using these versions face potential full CMS takeover-including configuration, plugin/theme installation, file manager, and all accounts-if an insider or compromised privileged account exploits the issue. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available, but the impact of successful escalation warrants immediate remediation.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 79% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
moderately popular open-source flat-file PHP CMS, common but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

More in Grav

View all
CVE-2025-66294 HIGH POC
8.7 Dec 01

Server-side template injection (SSTI) in Grav (getgrav/grav) prior to 1.8.0-beta.27 allows an authenticated attacker hol

CVE-2025-66301 HIGH POC
8.6 Dec 01

Broken access control in Grav CMS (CWE-285) before 1.8.0-beta.27 lets an authenticated editor-level user escalate their

CVE-2025-50286 HIGH POC
8.1 Aug 06

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in Grav CMS v1.7.48 allows an authenticated admin to upload a malicious plug

CVE-2024-34082 CRITICAL POC
9.9 May 15

Grav is a file-based Web platform. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, low a

CVE-2021-47812 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 16

GravCMS 1.10.7 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to write arbitrary YAML configuration files, leading to full serv

CVE-2026-65008 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 21

Remote code execution in Grav CMS 2.0.4 (fixed in 2.0.7) lets an authenticated user holding the admin.pages or api.pages

CVE-2026-75827 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 18

Remote code execution in Grav CMS before 2.0.15 allows attackers holding page-edit or blueprint-config privileges to wri

CVE-2026-75837 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 18

Vertical privilege escalation in Grav CMS before 2.0.14 lets a delegated administrator holding only the admin.users perm

CVE-2026-75828 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 18

Stored cross-site scripting in Grav CMS before 2.0.15 lets authenticated editors smuggle JavaScript event handlers past

CVE-2025-66844 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Dec 15

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in Grav CMS versions prior to 1.7.49.5 allows remote authenticated attackers to make

CVE-2025-66299 HIGH POC
8.8 Dec 01

Grav is a file-based Web platform. Prior to 1.8.0-beta.27, Grav CMS is vulnerable to a Server-Side Template Injection (S

CVE-2026-72819 HIGH POC
8.7 Aug 14

Remote code execution in Grav CMS before 2.0.13 allows authenticated low-privilege users to plant and execute arbitrary

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy