Skip to main content

Link Library EUVDEUVD-2026-86529

| CVE-2026-78397 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-09-25 WPScan GHSA-6rpr-h6cv-7xm2
4.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: WPScan
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify site running Link Library <7.9.6 with public submission form
  2. Delivery
    Submit internal-target URL via reciprocal-link form
  3. Exploit
    Safe request rejected, unprotected fallback fetch fires
  4. Execution
    Observe response differences
  5. Impact
    Map internal services/hosts

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Non-default configuration required: the site owner must have published the plugin's public link submission form AND enabled reciprocal-link validation, which is the code path that performs the outbound fetch. The vulnerable behavior only manifests when the plugin's protected/safe request is rejected and it falls back to an unprotected fetch, so exploitation is conditional on that fallback being reached (reflected in AC:H). Affected versions are Link Library 7.8.8 through 7.9.5 (installations below 7.8.8 fall under CVE-2025-68600; 7.9.6 is fixed). No authentication or user interaction is needed (PR:N/UI:N), but sites without the submission form or with reciprocal-link validation disabled are not exposed.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-priority issue despite being a network-exploitable, unauthenticated flaw. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N, base 4.0) is internally consistent with the description: it is remotely reachable and needs no authentication, but AC:H reflects that the vulnerable path only triggers under a specific plugin configuration and only after the plugin's protected/safe request is rejected, and the impact is limited to C:L (a boolean oracle revealing whether an internal service responded) with no integrity or availability impact. All exploitation signals reinforce low real-world risk: EPSS is 0.13% (2nd percentile), it is NOT on CISA KEV, and there is no evidence of active exploitation. A public exploit does exist (publicly available exploit code exists, published by WPScan), which raises reproducibility but must not be conflated with active exploitation - the two signals are distinct here. The CVSS vector and description agree (both indicate remote/unauthenticated SSRF), so no conflict needs flagging. The one nuance is that this is an incomplete-fix follow-up to CVE-2025-68600 (which covered versions below 7.8.8); this entry covers 7.8.8-7.9.5, so operators who believed they were patched by the earlier fix remain exposed until 7.9.6.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated visitor submits a crafted URL pointing at an internal host (e.g., a private RFC1918 address or localhost service) through the plugin's public reciprocal-link submission form. When the plugin's safe/protected request is rejected, it falls back to an unprotected fetch, and the differing response behavior tells the attacker whether an internal service answered, enabling internal network/port mapping. A public proof-of-concept from WPScan exists, though the high attack complexity (specific enabled configuration) limits scope.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 25, 2026

Server-side request forgery in the Link Library WordPress plugin versions 7.8.8 through 7.9.5 allows unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue outbound requests to hosts on its internal network and to observe from the response whether an internal service answered. The flaw is an incomplete fix for CVE-2025-68600 and only manifests when the plugin's protected 'safe request' is rejected and it falls back to an unprotected fetch, so sites must have published the plugin's public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled to be exposed. Publicly available exploit code exists, but EPSS is only 0.13% (2nd percentile) and the independent assessment rates this as a genuinely low-priority, information-only issue with a non-default configuration prerequisite.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade Link Library to version 7.9.6 or later, which closes the unprotected-fetch fallback introduced after the incomplete 7.8.8 fix for CVE-2025-68600; sites already on 7.9.6 need no further action, and sites below 7.8.8 should upgrade directly to 7.9.6 rather than to the superseded fix. If immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to disable either the plugin's public link submission form or its reciprocal-link validation setting, which removes the outbound-fetch code path entirely - the trade-off being that visitors can no longer submit links and automatic reciprocal-link checking stops working. As defense in depth, restrict the web server's outbound egress to block requests to RFC1918 private ranges, loopback, and link-local addresses (including the 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata endpoint), accepting that this may break legitimate integrations that rely on internal callbacks. Refer to the advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7842ef44-582c-40a8-8f3c-cf8abebaf7fb/ for vendor details.

Affected VersionsENISA

Link Library 7.8.8 <7.9.6

Affected Packages

euvd link_library fix: 7.9.6

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) in the Link Library plugin's reciprocal-link validation routine, which performs an outbound HTTP fetch to a user-supplied URL. The code attempts a protected/safe request first - presumably applying SSRF guards such as blocking private, loopback, or link-local address ranges - but when that safe request is rejected, it falls back to an unprotected fetch of the same attacker-controlled destination, effectively bypassing the guard. Because the vulnerable component influences resources outside its own security scope (the site's internal network), the assessed CVSS vector carries S:C (Changed). The CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N vector means the attack is network-reachable and requires no authentication or user interaction, but AC:H reflects that the site owner must have enabled the public submission form with reciprocal-link validation and the protected path must actually fail before the fallback is reached. The data is tracked as cpe:2.3:a:unknown:link_library, listed by WPScan and catalogued under ENISA EUVD ID EUVD-2026-86529, with impact limited to confidentiality (C:L) - the attacker learns whether an internal service responded, not its full contents.

Know when Link Library gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (WPScan) PRIMARY 4.0 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.0 MEDIUM

Remote unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N), but AC:H because it needs a specific enabled config and the safe-request fallback; S:C and C:L for the limited internal-service existence oracle, no I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).

CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Sep 25, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
4.0 (MEDIUM)
Patch available
Sep 25, 2026 - 08:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 25, 2026 - 06:00 cve.org
MEDIUM 4.0
CVE Published
Sep 25, 2026 - 06:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

The Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6 does not validate the destination of a user-supplied URL before falling back to an unprotected fetch when its safe request is rejected, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue requests to hosts on its internal network and to learn from the response whether an internal service answered.

Versions below 7.8.8 are covered by CVE-2025-68600; this entry covers 7.8.8 through 7.9.5, where that fix was incomplete. Exploitation requires the site owner to have published the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6's public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche third-party WordPress plugin, small install base relative to WordPress core
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +20
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2026-16532 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Aug 03

Unauthenticated SQL injection in the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitr

CVE-2026-16535 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Aug 08

Reflected XSS in the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.4 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject and ex

CVE-2026-78393 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Sep 25

Reflected cross-site scripting in the Link Library WordPress plugin (versions before 7.9.6) lets remote, unauthenticated

CVE-2026-78394 MEDIUM POC
4.1 Sep 25

Link Library, a WordPress plugin, writes a generated image to a destination folder that is taken directly from user inpu

CVE-2026-40779 HIGH
7.7 Jun 15

Arbitrary file deletion in the Link Library WordPress plugin (versions 7.8.8 and earlier) allows authenticated contribut

CVE-2026-15090 HIGH
7.5 Oct 15

Unauthenticated time-based blind SQL injection in the WordPress Link Library plugin (all versions up to and including 7.

CVE-2024-29123 HIGH
7.1 Mar 19

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre L

CVE-2024-24879 HIGH
7.1 Feb 08

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre L

CVE-2024-1559 MEDIUM
6.5 Feb 20

The Link Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'll_reciprocal' parameter in

CVE-2024-2325 MEDIUM
6.1 Apr 09

The Link Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the searchll parameter in all

CVE-2025-46237 MEDIUM
6.5 Apr 22

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre L

CVE-2024-4281 MEDIUM
6.4 May 08

The Link Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'link-library' short

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy