Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify site running Link Library <7.9.6 with public submission form
-
DeliverySubmit internal-target URL via reciprocal-link form
-
ExploitSafe request rejected, unprotected fallback fetch fires
-
ExecutionObserve response differences
-
ImpactMap internal services/hosts
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Non-default configuration required: the site owner must have published the plugin's public link submission form AND enabled reciprocal-link validation, which is the code path that performs the outbound fetch. The vulnerable behavior only manifests when the plugin's protected/safe request is rejected and it falls back to an unprotected fetch, so exploitation is conditional on that fallback being reached (reflected in AC:H). Affected versions are Link Library 7.8.8 through 7.9.5 (installations below 7.8.8 fall under CVE-2025-68600; 7.9.6 is fixed). No authentication or user interaction is needed (PR:N/UI:N), but sites without the submission form or with reciprocal-link validation disabled are not exposed. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue despite being a network-exploitable, unauthenticated flaw. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N, base 4.0) is internally consistent with the description: it is remotely reachable and needs no authentication, but AC:H reflects that the vulnerable path only triggers under a specific plugin configuration and only after the plugin's protected/safe request is rejected, and the impact is limited to C:L (a boolean oracle revealing whether an internal service responded) with no integrity or availability impact. All exploitation signals reinforce low real-world risk: EPSS is 0.13% (2nd percentile), it is NOT on CISA KEV, and there is no evidence of active exploitation. A public exploit does exist (publicly available exploit code exists, published by WPScan), which raises reproducibility but must not be conflated with active exploitation - the two signals are distinct here. The CVSS vector and description agree (both indicate remote/unauthenticated SSRF), so no conflict needs flagging. The one nuance is that this is an incomplete-fix follow-up to CVE-2025-68600 (which covered versions below 7.8.8); this entry covers 7.8.8-7.9.5, so operators who believed they were patched by the earlier fix remain exposed until 7.9.6. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated visitor submits a crafted URL pointing at an internal host (e.g., a private RFC1918 address or localhost service) through the plugin's public reciprocal-link submission form. When the plugin's safe/protected request is rejected, it falls back to an unprotected fetch, and the differing response behavior tells the attacker whether an internal service answered, enabling internal network/port mapping. A public proof-of-concept from WPScan exists, though the high attack complexity (specific enabled configuration) limits scope. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 25, 2026
Server-side request forgery in the Link Library WordPress plugin versions 7.8.8 through 7.9.5 allows unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue outbound requests to hosts on its internal network and to observe from the response whether an internal service answered. The flaw is an incomplete fix for CVE-2025-68600 and only manifests when the plugin's protected 'safe request' is rejected and it falls back to an unprotected fetch, so sites must have published the plugin's public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled to be exposed. Publicly available exploit code exists, but EPSS is only 0.13% (2nd percentile) and the independent assessment rates this as a genuinely low-priority, information-only issue with a non-default configuration prerequisite.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade Link Library to version 7.9.6 or later, which closes the unprotected-fetch fallback introduced after the incomplete 7.8.8 fix for CVE-2025-68600; sites already on 7.9.6 need no further action, and sites below 7.8.8 should upgrade directly to 7.9.6 rather than to the superseded fix. If immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to disable either the plugin's public link submission form or its reciprocal-link validation setting, which removes the outbound-fetch code path entirely - the trade-off being that visitors can no longer submit links and automatic reciprocal-link checking stops working. As defense in depth, restrict the web server's outbound egress to block requests to RFC1918 private ranges, loopback, and link-local addresses (including the 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata endpoint), accepting that this may break legitimate integrations that rely on internal callbacks. Refer to the advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7842ef44-582c-40a8-8f3c-cf8abebaf7fb/ for vendor details.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) in the Link Library plugin's reciprocal-link validation routine, which performs an outbound HTTP fetch to a user-supplied URL. The code attempts a protected/safe request first - presumably applying SSRF guards such as blocking private, loopback, or link-local address ranges - but when that safe request is rejected, it falls back to an unprotected fetch of the same attacker-controlled destination, effectively bypassing the guard. Because the vulnerable component influences resources outside its own security scope (the site's internal network), the assessed CVSS vector carries S:C (Changed). The CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N vector means the attack is network-reachable and requires no authentication or user interaction, but AC:H reflects that the site owner must have enabled the public submission form with reciprocal-link validation and the protected path must actually fail before the fallback is reached. The data is tracked as cpe:2.3:a:unknown:link_library, listed by WPScan and catalogued under ENISA EUVD ID EUVD-2026-86529, with impact limited to confidentiality (C:L) - the attacker learns whether an internal service responded, not its full contents.
Know when Link Library gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Remote unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N), but AC:H because it needs a specific enabled config and the safe-request fallback; S:C and C:L for the limited internal-service existence oracle, no I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
The Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6 does not validate the destination of a user-supplied URL before falling back to an unprotected fetch when its safe request is rejected, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue requests to hosts on its internal network and to learn from the response whether an internal service answered.
Versions below 7.8.8 are covered by CVE-2025-68600; this entry covers 7.8.8 through 7.9.5, where that fix was incomplete. Exploitation requires the site owner to have published the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6's public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
More in Link Library
View allUnauthenticated SQL injection in the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitr
Reflected XSS in the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.4 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject and ex
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Link Library WordPress plugin (versions before 7.9.6) lets remote, unauthenticated
Link Library, a WordPress plugin, writes a generated image to a destination folder that is taken directly from user inpu
Arbitrary file deletion in the Link Library WordPress plugin (versions 7.8.8 and earlier) allows authenticated contribut
Unauthenticated time-based blind SQL injection in the WordPress Link Library plugin (all versions up to and including 7.
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre L
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre L
The Link Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'll_reciprocal' parameter in
The Link Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the searchll parameter in all
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre L
The Link Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'link-library' short
EUVD-2026-86529
GHSA-6rpr-h6cv-7xm2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB