Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege console credentials
-
DeliveryAuthenticate to OpManager/Firewall Analyzer UI
-
ExploitRequest alert-notification creation for out-of-scope firewall
-
ExecutionServer skips ownership/scope check
-
ImpactNotification created beyond assigned scope
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Object-level authorization, IDOR prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated low-privilege user account on ManageEngine OpManager or Firewall Analyzer version 12.8.710 or below (PR:L, no user interaction). Exploitation is only meaningful in deployments that use scoped/segmented access - i.e., multiple users, teams, or tenants with firewalls assigned to distinct scopes; in a flat single-admin deployment there is no boundary to cross. The limiting factors are the need for valid (even minimal) console credentials and a multi-scope configuration; there is no unauthenticated or default-config network exploitation path. |
| Impact | This is a vendor-reported (ZohoCorp) authorization flaw with no corroborating exploitation signals: no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided - so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. The vendor CVSS of 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N) is network-reachable and low-complexity but explicitly requires an authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L), which materially constrains the attacker population to insiders or those who have already obtained valid credentials. The C:H rating appears inflated for the described behavior: the flaw lets a low-privilege user 'create alert notifications for firewalls outside their assigned scope', which is fundamentally a cross-tenant/cross-scope integrity and boundary-violation issue (CWE-639 IDOR), not a bulk data-disclosure primitive - so a High confidentiality impact is questionable and should be verified against the vendor advisory. Net: this is a moderate, authenticated broken-access-control bug relevant to multi-tenant/segregated OpManager and Firewall Analyzer deployments, not a high-urgency unauthenticated RCE; real-world priority is low-to-medium absent any exploitation evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privilege user (or an attacker who has phished/stolen such an account) logs into the ManageEngine OpManager or Firewall Analyzer web console and issues requests to create alert-notification rules referencing firewall objects assigned to other users, teams, or tenants. Because the server does not enforce scope ownership on the target object, the notifications are created outside the attacker's authorized boundary, enabling cross-scope reconnaissance or misuse of monitoring/alerting. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026
Broken access control in ZohoCorp ManageEngine OpManager and ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer 12.8.710 and earlier lets an authenticated low-privilege console user create alert notifications for firewalls that fall outside their assigned scope. The weakness (CWE-639, authorization bypass through a user-controlled key) only matters in deployments that actually enforce separate scopes - multi-user, multi-team, or multi-tenant setups - since a flat single-administrator installation has no boundary to cross. Exploitation requires a valid, even minimal, console account (CVSS vector PR:L, no user interaction) and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis: no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS score, and no POC were provided.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor fix referenced by the ManageEngine ITOM advisory at https://www.manageengine.com/itom/advisory/cve-2026-84789.html; the exact patched build number is not specified in the available data, so treat the advisory as the authoritative source and upgrade OpManager and Firewall Analyzer above the 12.8.710 baseline it describes ('patch available per vendor advisory'). Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, use compensating controls that require no code change: (1) audit and minimize the number of low-privilege console accounts and reduce the scope assignments granted to non-administrator users, so fewer users can create notifications at all - the trade-off is reduced operational flexibility for delegated teams; (2) restrict console access (TCP/8060, 9443 and other configured management ports) to a hardened admin VLAN or jump host with MFA, which shrinks the population of valid credentials an attacker could abuse but does not remove the underlying authorization gap; (3) review existing alert/notification profiles and audit logs for firewall identifiers that do not belong to the owning user's scope, and delete any cross-scope entries - detection-oriented, so it will not prevent a first-time abuse; (4) temporarily disable the self-service notification feature for non-administrative roles if the product permits it, accepting the loss of delegated alerting. Because exploitation is authenticated and scope-dependent, credential hygiene, session review, and least privilege for console roles are the highest-leverage interim measures; there is no unauthenticated or default-configuration network exploitation path to block.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-639, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key - commonly called an IDOR-style flaw. In OpManager and Firewall Analyzer, alert/notification profiles reference firewall (device) identifiers that the client supplies, and the server failed to verify that the requesting user's scope actually contains the referenced firewall before creating the notification. Scope assignment is a core multi-user/Enterprise feature of ManageEngine ITOM, so the missing check breaks the intended partition between teams or tenants. The affected components are the network-monitoring console (cpe:2.3:a:zohocorp:manageengine_opmanager) and the firewall log/rule analysis console (cpe:2.3:a:zohocorp:manageengine_firewall_analyzer); both are typically reached over HTTP(S) on the management network, matching the AV:N network vector. The vendor assigned CVSS 7.1 (C:H) while the independent assessment scores it lower on confidentiality (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N), reflecting that the attacker gains visibility into and the ability to configure alerting on out-of-scope devices rather than full data compromise, read/write of arbitrary records, or administrative takeover; scope is unchanged (S:U) and there is no privilege escalation or code execution.
Know when Manageengine Opmanager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Authenticated low-priv user (PR:L) over the network creates out-of-scope alert config; impact is a scope-boundary/integrity violation with minor info exposure, so C:L/I:L, not C:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (Zohocorp).
CVSS VectorVendor: Zohocorp
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
ZohoCorp ManageEngine OpManager and Firewall Analyzer versions 12.8.710 and below were vulnerable to a Broken Access Control vulnerability that allowed an authenticated low-privilege user to create alert notifications for firewalls outside their assigned scope.
Executive ViewAI
ZohoCorp's ManageEngine OpManager and Firewall Analyzer (12.8.710 and earlier) contain an access-control flaw that lets any authenticated low-privilege console user create alert notifications for firewalls outside their assigned scope. The risk is concentrated in organizations that run these platforms as shared, multi-team, or multi-tenant services, where a boundary violation can expose one business unit's or customer's firewall monitoring to another; single-administrator, flat deployments have no boundary to cross and face little practical exposure. Because a valid console account - even a minimal one - is required and no public exploit has been identified, this is a contained insider/least-privilege governance issue rather than an external attack vector, but it warrants attention in any managed-service or segmented environment.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict console access to trusted networks, remove or suspend unnecessary low-privilege console accounts, review scope assignments so each account maps to only the firewalls it needs, and monitor alert-notification creation events for cross-scope activity. Deployments that do not enforce separate scopes (flat single-administrator installs) have no boundary to cross and can be deprioritized.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Manageengine Opmanager
View allZOHO ManageEngine OpManager 11.5 build 11600 and earlier uses a hardcoded password of "plugin" for the IntegrationUser a
PGSQL:SubmitQuery.do in ZOHO ManageEngine OpManager 11.6, 11.5, and earlier allows remote administrators to bypass SQL q
A directory traversal vulnerability exists in the uploadMib functionality of ManageEngine OpManager 12.7.258. Rated crit
Directory traversal vulnerability in the com.me.opmanager.extranet.remote.communication.fw.fe.FileCollector servlet in Z
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in ZOHO ManageEngine OpManager 8 (build 88xx) through 11.4, IT360 10.3 and
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in ZOHO ManageEngine OpManager 11.3 and 11.4, IT360 10.3 and 10.4, and Social IT
SQL injection vulnerability in the com.manageengine.opmanager.servlet.UpdateProbeUpgradeStatus servlet in ZOHO ManageEng
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the FailOverHelperServlet (aka FailServlet) servlet in ZOHO ManageEngine OpMan
Directory traversal vulnerability in the multipartRequest servlet in ZOHO ManageEngine OpManager 11.3 and earlier, Socia
Zoho ManageEngine OpManager before 12.5.329 allows unauthenticated Remote Code Execution due to a general bypass in the
Directory traversal vulnerability in the FileCollector servlet in ZOHO ManageEngine OpManager 11.4, 11.3, and earlier al
An issue was discovered in Zoho ManageEngine OpManager in builds before 14310. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this
EUVD-2026-85261
GHSA-7hrr-v8c3-rmjf
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB