Skip to main content

MCP Atlassian EUVDEUVD-2026-84631

| CVE-2026-77261 HIGH
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-09-22 GitHub_M GHSA-6529-c226-h328
8.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attacker controls/compromises configured Atlassian instance
  2. Delivery
    MCP server connects via basic-auth or OAuth
  3. Exploit
    Server returns 302 to 169.254.169.254 metadata
  4. Execution
    Unprotected session follows redirect
  5. Impact
    Internal metadata/IAM credentials exfiltrated

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires MCP Atlassian < 0.22.0 configured through the basic-auth or oauth_pat authentication branch (the header-PAT branch is NOT affected because it alone attaches _make_ssrf_safe_hook / attach_ssrf_hook=True). The attacker must control or have already compromised the specific Atlassian instance the server is configured to connect to, and that instance must return a 3xx redirect whose Location points at an internal/private address (e.g. the 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata service). Exploitation further depends on an actually reachable internal target (cloud metadata endpoint or other internal service) from the MCP host. Limiting factors: not exploitable against a trusted/uncompromised Atlassian backend, not applicable to header-PAT deployments, and no end-user interaction is needed but operator-level trust in a malicious upstream is effectively a prerequisite.

Impact

This is a genuine but conditionally-gated SSRF (CWE-918). CVSS 3.1 (8.5, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N) reflects a network-reachable, scope-changing information-disclosure flaw, and the S:C/C:H combination is what pushes it to High - the SSRF pivots from the MCP process into internal services (e.g. the 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata endpoint) to steal IAM credentials. However, the exploitation-signal cluster points to LOW real-world urgency: EPSS is only 0.32% (26th percentile), and SSVC records Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial - i.e. no observed exploitation and not mass-automatable. A public PoC exists (author-supplied in the GHSA advisory, tested on v0.21.1/commit d8bc786), so exploit knowledge is public, but PoC availability is NOT active exploitation and this is not on CISA KEV. The most important nuance the raw CVSS understates: the attacker must CONTROL OR HAVE COMPROMISED the Atlassian instance the MCP server is already configured to trust - this is not drive-by exploitation of a default deployment, but abuse of a malicious/compromised upstream that the operator deliberately points at. That precondition (plus a reachable internal metadata/service endpoint) materially raises real attack complexity beyond the AC:L in the NVD vector. Net: a real defect worth patching, but a targeted/scenario-dependent issue rather than a wormable priority.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An MCP Atlassian server (< 0.22.0) is configured with basic-auth or OAuth/PAT credentials pointing at an Atlassian instance the attacker controls or has compromised. When the MCP server makes a request, that instance replies with a 302 redirect to http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/; because the SSRF redirect hook is only attached in the header-PAT branch, the unprotected session follows the redirect and returns cloud metadata (e.g. AWS IAM credentials) to the attacker. A working PoC is published in the GHSA advisory (tested on v0.21.1), though no active exploitation has been reported.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Sep 25, 2026

Server-side request forgery in MCP Atlassian prior to 0.22.0 lets an attacker who controls or has already compromised the configured Atlassian backend return a 3xx redirect pointing at an internal address (for example the 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata service), which the MCP server's HTTP session then follows - potentially returning cloud IAM credentials or other internal service data to the attacker. Only deployments configured through the basic-auth or oauth_pat branches are exposed, because those fetcher sessions fail to attach the _make_ssrf_safe_hook redirect validator that the header-PAT branch sets via attach_ssrf_hook=True; header-PAT deployments are not affected. Publicly available exploit code exists (no CISA KEV listing, so no confirmed active exploitation), the vendor fix ships in 0.22.0, and EPSS remains low at 0.32% (26th percentile) with the assessed vector requiring high attack complexity and a malicious upstream prerequisite.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Sep 22, 2026 - 18:33 CVSS 7.1

Server-side request forgery in MCP Atlassian versions prior to 0.22.0 allows an attacker who can influence the configured upstream Atlassian instance to make the MCP server follow an HTTP redirect to an internal address, because the _make_ssrf_safe_hook redirect validator is omitted from JiraFetcher and ConfluenceFetcher sessions created through the basic-auth and oauth_pat branches and those sessions do not revalidate redirect destinations. Per the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N, 7.1) the attacker is a low-privileged, authenticated operator-configurable path and must also control or have compromised the configured Atlassian endpoint, so exploitation is not possible where the configured instance is fully trusted and defender-controlled; confidentiality impact is high (reachable internal services or cloud metadata) while integrity impact is low. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and the issue is fixed in 0.22.0.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to mcp-atlassian 0.22.0 (for example pip install --upgrade 'mcp-atlassian>=0.22.0'), which attaches make_ssrf_redirect_hook to all Confluence and Jira sessions and mounts DNS pinning to eliminate the validate-then-reconnect TOCTOU; the change is documented in advisory GHSA-6529-c226-h328 and delivered by PR https://github.com/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/pull/1448 (commit b041733473f95119dd539542a43c280737a8e460). If immediate upgrade is not possible, switch the deployment to the header-PAT authentication branch, which already attaches the SSRF hook - the trade-off is that it requires a header-based personal access token and may not be compatible with OAuth or basic-auth environments. In parallel, enforce network-layer compensating controls on the MCP host: block outbound traffic to link-local 169.254.0.0/16 and RFC1918 ranges, and require IMDSv2 (session-token-only) on AWS so a followed redirect cannot retrieve instance credentials - note that blanket egress filtering can break legitimate access to on-premises Atlassian Server instances, so scope exceptions to the specific Atlassian hosts in use. Also treat the configured Atlassian endpoint as a trust boundary: do not point the server at attacker-influenced or unvetted Confluence/Jira instances, since the assessed attack complexity (AC:H) and prerequisite of a malicious upstream limit but do not eliminate risk.

Affected VersionsENISA

mcp-atlassian < 0.22.0

Affected Packages

pypi mcp-atlassian fix: 0.22.0

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in pypi

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

MCP Atlassian is a Python Model Context Protocol server that brokers tool calls to Atlassian Confluence and Jira using the requests library. The root cause is CWE-918 (server-side request forgery), specifically an incomplete fix for an earlier SSRF advisory (GHSA-7r34-79r5-rcc9): the redirect-validation hook _make_ssrf_safe_hook checks response.is_redirect, reads the Location header, and calls validate_url_for_ssrf() to reject private/link-local destinations before a redirected request is issued. In src/mcp_atlassian/servers/dependencies.py, three authentication branches call _create_and_validate(), but only Branch 1 (header PAT) passes attach_ssrf_hook=True; the parameter defaults to False, so Branch 2 (basic auth) and Branch 3 (oauth_pat) build JiraFetcher/ConfluenceFetcher sessions with no response hook on the hook chain. If the upstream Atlassian instance answers with 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/, the unprotected session follows it because Python's requests does not restrict redirect targets by default. The upstream fix in PR #1448 applies make_ssrf_redirect_hook() to every Confluence/Jira session at client construction time - covering direct _session.get() paths and global/stdio fetchers, not just the per-user HTTP path - and mounts mount_ssrf_pinning() to resolve and validate once and then connect to that pinned address while preserving TLS SNI, closing the validate-then-reconnect DNS-rebinding TOCTOU window. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:sooperset:mcp-atlassian:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms the affected component is the PyPI-distributed mcp-atlassian package rather than a hosted service, and the accompanying PR also hardens adjacent path-traversal and CQL allowlist logic, reinforcing that this is a defense-in-depth hardening release.

Know when Mcp Atlassian gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GitHub_M) PRIMARY HIGH
NVD 8.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.1 HIGH

AC:H because it requires a controlled/compromised trusted Atlassian upstream and a reachable internal endpoint; PR:L for configured credential trust; S:C/C:H as SSRF pivots to internal metadata credentials.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Sep 25, 2026 - 17:37 NVD
7.1 (HIGH) 8.5 (HIGH)
Patch available
Sep 22, 2026 - 19:02 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 22, 2026 - 18:06 cve.org
HIGH 7.1

DescriptionNVD

MCP Atlassian is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Atlassian products (Confluence and Jira). Prior to 0.22.0, _make_ssrf_safe_hook is omitted from JiraFetcher and ConfluenceFetcher sessions created through the basic-auth and oauth_pat branches. If an attacker-controlled or compromised configured Atlassian instance returns a redirect to an internal address, those sessions can follow the redirect without revalidating its destination. This issue is fixed in version 0.22.0.

Technical POC Analysis

CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery).

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

MCP Atlassian deployments prior to 0.22.0 that use basic-auth or oauth_pat configurations are exposed to a server-side request forgery issue that can redirect the server to internal endpoints, including cloud metadata services, potentially exposing cloud IAM credentials. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the vendor has released 0.22.0, so organizations running affected configurations should prioritize remediation. Leadership should care because successful exploitation could enable cloud account compromise and lateral movement, though the attack requires an attacker to control or have compromised the configured Atlassian backend.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche emerging PyPI MCP server for Atlassian, limited production footprint
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

62
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2026-77274 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 22

Server-side request forgery in MCP Atlassian (the Model Context Protocol server for Confluence and Jira) prior to 0.22.0

CVE-2026-77243 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 22

MCP Atlassian (sooperset/mcp-atlassian) before 0.22.0 applies its ENABLED_TOOLS and TOOLSETS least-privilege filters onl

CVE-2026-77262 HIGH POC
8.6 Sep 22

Path traversal in MCP Atlassian releases prior to 0.22.0 lets a caller of the confluence_upload_attachment MCP tool read

CVE-2026-77248 HIGH POC
8.6 Sep 22

Unauthenticated arbitrary file read in MCP Atlassian (sooperset/mcp-atlassian) before 0.22.0 lets a remote network calle

CVE-2026-77255 HIGH POC
8.6 Sep 22

Arbitrary local file read leading to data exfiltration affects sooperset's MCP Atlassian server (mcp-atlassian) prior to

CVE-2026-77246 HIGH POC
8.6 Sep 22

Unauthenticated server-local file exfiltration in MCP Atlassian (sooperset/mcp-atlassian) before 0.22.0 allows a remote

CVE-2026-77271 HIGH POC
8.3 Sep 22

MCP Atlassian (sooperset/mcp-atlassian) before 0.22.0 lets a low-privileged authenticated MCP caller write attacker-chos

CVE-2026-77267 HIGH POC
8.3 Sep 22

Server-side request forgery in MCP Atlassian (sooperset/mcp-atlassian) before 0.22.0 allows a low-privileged authenticat

CVE-2026-77257 HIGH POC
8.3 Sep 22

Arbitrary local file read in MCP Atlassian (mcp-atlassian) prior to 0.22.0 allows an authenticated MCP caller who can re

CVE-2026-77260 HIGH POC
8.3 Sep 22

Arbitrary server-local file read and exfiltration in MCP Atlassian (sooperset/mcp-atlassian) prior to 0.22.0 lets an aut

CVE-2026-77247 HIGH POC
8.3 Sep 22

Path traversal in the MCP Atlassian server (mcp-atlassian) prior to 0.22.0 allows an authenticated MCP client to read fi

CVE-2026-77251 HIGH POC
8.3 Sep 22

Information disclosure in MCP Atlassian (sooperset/mcp-atlassian) before 0.22.0 allows an authenticated caller of the MC

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy