Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection EUVDEUVD-2026-83302

| CVE-2026-80442 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-m3rh-r6pf-7qmh
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privilege Guardium account
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted exportCertificate request
  3. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters into command
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary OS commands on appliance
  5. Impact
    Full confidentiality/integrity/availability compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires (1) valid authenticated access to the IBM Guardium Data Protection management console at a low privilege level (PR:L confirmed by CVSS vector), and (2) use of the specific exportCertificate functionality, which passes attacker-controlled input to an OS command without sanitization. Limiting factors: an attacker must already hold credentials, so this is not exploitable by fully unauthenticated outsiders; the affected component is version 12.2 specifically; and realistic exposure depends on whether the Guardium console is network-reachable to the attacker, which in well-segmented deployments is typically restricted to administrative networks.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects a network-reachable, low-complexity OS command injection requiring only low-privilege authentication (PR:L) and no user interaction, yielding total compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability - consistent with the SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating. However, the real-world exploitation signals temper the urgency: EPSS is only 0.63% (49th percentile), the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, no public exploit code was identified, and SSVC marks Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no'. These signals align coherently - this is a genuinely high-impact flaw but currently carries no evidence of active or automatable exploitation, so it is a 'patch promptly' item rather than an emergency. The PR:L requirement is the key risk-reducer: an attacker must first hold valid (even low-privilege) credentials on the Guardium console, which limits exposure to insiders or attackers who have already obtained a foothold or valid account. A vendor patch is available (IBM support node 7288040), making remediation straightforward. No major data conflicts exist; the CVSS network vector is consistent with the description of a web/console exportCertificate function.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker possessing low-privilege credentials to the IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 management interface submits a crafted request to the exportCertificate functionality, injecting shell metacharacters into an unsanitized parameter. Because input is passed to an OS command, the attacker executes arbitrary commands on the underlying appliance, enabling full host takeover. No public proof-of-concept was identified at the time of analysis, and no user interaction is required.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Oct 06, 2026

Authenticated OS command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a user holding only low-privilege console credentials execute arbitrary operating-system commands on the affected appliance through the exportCertificate functionality, resulting in full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 3.1 base score 8.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Because the attack requires valid credentials and network reachability to the Guardium management interface, it is not usable by unauthenticated outsiders; CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no', and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. EPSS is 0.63 percent (49th percentile), consistent with a targeted, credentialed issue rather than a broadly exploited one, and IBM has published a vendor patch.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Sep 18, 2026 - 19:56 CVSS 9.9

OS command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an authenticated, low-privileged user to execute arbitrary operating-system commands through the exportCertificate functionality, giving full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected appliance. The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.9) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity attack that needs only a valid low-privileged session and no user interaction, with a scope change indicating impact beyond the vulnerable component. Only version 12.2 is listed as affected, no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the vendor has published a fix.

RemediationAI

IBM has released a vendor patch for this issue; apply the fix documented in the IBM support advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288040, confirming your build against the versions listed there before upgrading (the supplied data states patch availability from the vendor but does not enumerate a specific fixed version, so do not assume a version number). Until the update is applied, the highest-value compensating control is to restrict network access to the Guardium management console so that only trusted administrative networks or jump hosts can reach it, accepting that this can break remote administration workflows and requires adjustments to firewall and VPN policy. In parallel, prune accounts on the appliance to the minimum set and lowest privilege levels needed, since exploitation requires a valid authenticated session (PR:L) and removing unused or over-privileged users directly reduces the attack surface, at the cost of some operational convenience for auditors and integrators. Because the injection occurs in the certificate-export code path, consider temporarily disabling or tightly restricting use of exportCertificate by non-administrative roles where the product's RBAC permits it, and monitor Guardium host logs for unexpected child processes or shell invocations spawned by the management web application, which can generate false positives during legitimate maintenance but provides the best chance of detecting a compromised session.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic OS command injection (CWE-78) in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2's exportCertificate feature. Rather than invoking the certificate-export operation through a safe API, the component assembles a shell command that incorporates attacker-controlled input without sanitization or escaping, so shell metacharacters or command separators supplied in that input are interpreted by the underlying operating system and executed with the privileges of the Guardium service. The affected code sits in the Guardium management console, a network-exposed administrative web application, which is why the CVSS vector carries AV:N while the required privilege level (PR:L) keeps it from being an unauthenticated attack; the vector shows no user interaction (UI:N) and unchanged scope (S:U). CPE coverage is broad (cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), but EUVD and the IBM advisory scope the confirmed affected release to Guardium Data Protection 12.2. Impact per the assessor is total across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, matching CISA's SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating; the low automatability score reflects that each attempt requires an authenticated session and knowledge of the export endpoint.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY CRITICAL
NVD 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-accessible console function requires valid low-privilege credentials (PR:L) with no user interaction; OS command injection yields total host compromise, so C/I/A all High.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Oct 06, 2026 - 14:52 NVD
CRITICAL HIGH
CVSS changed
Oct 06, 2026 - 14:52 NVD
9.9 (CRITICAL) 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Sep 18, 2026 - 19:25 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.9

DescriptionNVD

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the exportCertificate functionality. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute unauthorized commands and impact the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 - the platform many organizations depend on to monitor and protect sensitive database activity - contains a high-severity flaw that allows any user with basic console login rights to run arbitrary operating-system commands directly on the appliance. A successful attack would give that user full control over the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the monitoring appliance, potentially exposing the very data it is meant to protect and undermining the compliance evidence it produces. Because abuse requires valid low-privilege credentials plus network reachability to the management interface, the practical exposure comes from insider misuse, compromised analyst accounts, and unmanaged service accounts rather than external attackers.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 51% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise database security appliance, common in regulated orgs but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

CVE-2026-80441 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy