Skip to main content

IBM i EUVDEUVD-2026-83299

| CVE-2026-18869 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-m47x-fj2g-vfr5
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to IBM i FTP with low-priv creds
  2. Delivery
    Craft PORT/EPRT with internal IP:port
  3. Exploit
    Server fails to validate command
  4. Execution
    Server opens data connection to internal service
  5. Impact
    Relay/probe internal network services across boundary

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires (1) the IBM i FTP server being enabled and network-reachable, and (2) the attacker holding valid FTP credentials (PR:L - authenticated), since the flaw is triggered by sending crafted FTP PORT and EPRT commands within an established session. The concrete prerequisite is an FTP account whose PORT/EPRT-supplied address the attacker controls; useful impact further requires internal network services that become reachable through the IBM i host acting as an SSRF pivot (scope change, S:C). Limiting factors: authentication is mandatory, impact is limited to confidentiality/integrity of the reached internal services (C:L/I:L, no availability impact), and value depends on there being sensitive internal services segmented behind the IBM i host that the attacker cannot otherwise reach.

Impact

This is a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N = 6.4 Medium) is internally consistent with the description: a network-reachable, low-complexity FTP bounce/SSRF (CWE-918) that requires an authenticated FTP session (PR:L) and crosses a security boundary (S:C) to reach internal services the attacker should not touch. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the provided intelligence, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation - the signals do not conflict, they simply point to a not-yet-widely-weaponized vulnerability. The main risk driver is the scope change: a low-privilege FTP user can pivot the trusted IBM i host into an SSRF relay against otherwise-unreachable internal network services. The main risk limiter is the authentication requirement (PR:L) plus the low, partial C:L/I:L impact and no availability impact. Net: a real defensive priority for shops running IBM i FTP with untrusted or numerous FTP accounts, but not a drop-everything critical given authentication is required and no exploitation is confirmed.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker holding valid but low-privileged FTP credentials on an IBM i host connects and issues crafted PORT/EPRT commands whose IP/port fields point at internal-only services (for example an internal database, admin port, or management interface) rather than the client. Because IBM i does not properly validate these commands, it opens data connections to those internal targets on the attacker's behalf, using the trusted host as an SSRF pivot to reach services blocked from the attacker's own network. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data, though FTP-bounce/PORT-command abuse is a well-understood classical technique.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

Server-side request forgery in the IBM i FTP server (releases 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6) lets an authenticated FTP user bypass security restrictions and pivot to internal network services by supplying crafted PORT and EPRT commands. The flaw is an improper-validation issue (CWE-918) with a scope change because the FTP component directs connections to services outside its own security boundary; scoring is CVSS 6.4 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N), so exploitation requires valid FTP credentials and network reachability of the FTP service, and impact is limited to confidentiality and integrity of whatever internal services the IBM i host can reach. Per the independent assessment this is a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than an emergency, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; the vendor has published a fix.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: IBM has published remediation for this issue at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7287873, and administrators should apply the applicable IBM i PTF (program temporary fix) or cumulative fix for their release (7.3, 7.4, 7.5, or 7.6) as directed there, since the specific PTF identifiers are published per release rather than as a single cross-version version number. Because remediation requires a PTF cycle and an IPL in some cases, compensating controls should be applied in the interim; the most effective is to stop the IBM i FTP server entirely if file transfer is not a business requirement (for example by ending the FTP server subsystem job), which fully removes the attack surface but breaks any dependent file-transfer workflows. If FTP must stay running, restrict TCP port 21 to trusted source networks with firewall rules or IBM i packet filtering, and use FTP exit programs or an equivalent access-control mechanism to permit only known accounts, since exploitation requires an authenticated FTP session (PR:L) and limiting who can authenticate is the most direct compensating control. Where the protocol mix allows it, prefer SFTP/SSH-based or otherwise tunneled transfers over clear-text FTP so that the PORT/EPRT active-mode path is not exposed, and log and monitor outbound connection attempts originating from the IBM i host toward internal addresses as a detection measure for SSRF-style abuse. Each network restriction carries the trade-off of blocking legitimate remote clients, so pair it with an inventory of approved FTP consumers before tightening rules.

Affected VersionsENISA

i 7.4
i 7.6
i 7.3
i 7.5

Affected Packages

euvd i no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected technology is the FTP server shipped with IBM i (the midrange Power Systems operating system formerly known as OS/400) across releases 7.3 through 7.6, captured in CPE as cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The root cause maps to CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery): in active-mode FTP, the client tells the server where to open the data connection via PORT (RFC 959, IPv4) and EPRT (RFC 2428, extended address family) commands. When the server fails to validate the address and port supplied in those commands, an attacker with an FTP session can point them at loopback, link-local, or other internal addresses instead of their own client, causing the IBM i FTP service to initiate outbound connections on the attacker's behalf. Because the vulnerable FTP component and the reached internal service are different security scopes, the vector carries S:C, which is what lifts the base score despite only Low confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact. The exploitation chain is conditional: the FTP server must be enabled and reachable, the attacker must hold valid FTP credentials (PR:L), and meaningful impact depends on sensitive internal services being segmented behind the IBM i host so that the host becomes a useful SSRF pivot.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY MEDIUM
NVD 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.4 MEDIUM

Network-reachable FTP requiring valid credentials (PR:L) with no user interaction; improper PORT/EPRT validation pivots to internal services beyond the FTP server (S:C) with partial C:L/I:L and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionNVD

IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions and access internal network services due to improper validation of FTP PORT and EPRT commands.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 87% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
IBM i is a common enterprise midrange OS but industry-specific, not everywhere
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy