Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain code execution at System privilege
-
ExploitInvoke flawed logic-error code path
-
ExecutionEscalate beyond System boundary
-
ImpactGain elevated persistent control
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess local System execution privileges on the device (PR:H, AV:L) - the flaw is a privilege-escalation logic error reachable only from that context, not a remote or unprivileged entry point. No user interaction is required (UI:N). What limits it: the high pre-existing privilege requirement means it is only useful as a secondary escalation step after an initial System-level compromise, and the scope is effectively Google Pixel / Android devices addressed by the 2026-09-01 Pixel bulletin. The description names no specific feature or configuration, so no non-default setting is known to be required. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low real-world priority despite its 'Medium' 6.7 CVSS score. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U) makes the gating factor explicit: exploitation is LOCAL and requires PR:H - the description itself states 'System execution privileges needed.' An attacker who already holds System privileges on an Android/Pixel device has little left to gain, so the C:H/I:H/A:H impact rating is generous and the net severity is modest. Exploitation signals reinforce low urgency: EPSS is 0.12% (2nd percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC is identified. No SSVC decision data was supplied. The signals are internally consistent - a local, high-privilege, no-active-exploitation logic bug - with no network-vs-local contradiction to flag. The main caveat is that the description is boilerplate ('logic error in multiple locations') and identifies no specific component, so the exact attack surface cannot be verified from the input alone. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | Malicious or compromised code already running with System execution privileges on a Pixel/Android device invokes an affected code path whose logic error permits crossing into a higher-privileged context. No user interaction is required. No public exploit code has been identified, so any attack would presently require original vulnerability research. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Android kernel affects Google Pixel devices and is addressed by the September 2026 Pixel security bulletin; an attacker who already holds System-level execution privileges on the device can exploit a logic error in the code to gain further elevated access. The flaw is a logic error rather than a memory-safety bug, requires no user interaction, and is not remotely reachable - the CVSS vector (AV:L/PR:H/UI:N) confirms it is only usable as a secondary escalation step after an initial high-privilege local compromise. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, no CISA KEV listing, and the EPSS score of roughly 0.12% (2nd percentile) reflects the low likelihood of exploitation, making this a low real-world priority despite the 6.7 'Medium' base score.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: apply the September 2026 Pixel security bulletin update (https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/pixel/2026/2026-09-01), which is the authoritative fix path for the Android kernel on affected Pixel devices; exact fix build identifiers are not enumerated in the available data and should be read from the bulletin's build table. Because exploitation requires the attacker to already possess System-level local execution privileges, this is a secondary-escalation issue rather than an entry point, so it should be scheduled as routine monthly patching priority and not trigger emergency response - consistent with the EPSS 0.12% (2nd percentile) likelihood and the absence of any KEV listing or public exploit. Where immediate patching is not feasible, the effective compensating controls are those that deny an attacker the prerequisite System context: keep the bootloader locked with verified boot (AVB) enforced so a tampered kernel cannot persist, disable or tightly restrict developer options, USB debugging, and ADB/tethered root access on managed devices, and enforce Android Enterprise device policies that block sideloading of privileged tooling. Each of these controls reduces the attack surface for the prerequisite foothold but does not neutralize the logic error itself, and the trade-off is reduced developer/troubleshooting flexibility; they are temporary measures only and should not replace the monthly security update cycle.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is classified as CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure), meaning the kernel's privilege-enforcement logic - the checks, gates, or permission boundaries that separate a System-privileged context from a more privileged one - can be bypassed or mis-evaluated under specific conditions rather than corrupted through memory-safety errors. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:google:android:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, with EUVD listing the specific component as the Android kernel, and the reporting source is Google_Devices, indicating a first-party Android/Pixel kernel finding. The CVSS:3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H describes a local attack path with low complexity and no user interaction, but a high privilege prerequisite (PR:H) - the attacker must already be operating in a System-privileged context before the logic error can be leveraged. Scope is unchanged (S:U), so the impact is confined to the vulnerable kernel security context, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability consequences once the escalation succeeds. Because the description names no specific subsystem, driver, or non-default configuration, no particular feature or setting is known to be required for the flaw to be reachable from that privileged context.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local escalation from an already-System context gives AV:L/PR:H/UI:N; full-device compromise on success supports C/I/A:H, though generous given the high starting privilege.
Primary rating from Vendor (Google_Devices).
CVSS VectorVendor: Google_Devices
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-78978
GHSA-3p9f-f2r9-mqw3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB