Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privilege CyberPanel user
-
DeliveryRequest child domain listing via fetchChildDomainsMain
-
ExploitORM alias filter fails to exclude target domains (CWE-1025)
-
ExecutionMissing ownership rejection in checkOwnership falls through
-
ImpactAccess or modify cross-account domain records without authorization
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an active authenticated session on CyberPanel with at least low-privilege (reseller or user-level) credentials - unauthenticated exploitation is not supported by the CVSS PR:L metric. The cross-account integrity impact (S:C) is contingent on a multi-tenant CyberPanel deployment where multiple accounts share the same panel instance and have configured child or alias domains. The vulnerability is confined to the child-domain management functionality ( |
| Impact | The vendor-provided CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N scores 7.7 (High). The S:C (Changed Scope) and I:H (High Integrity) pairing is the most significant signal: it implies a low-privilege authenticated user can affect domain records outside their own account on shared multi-tenant installations. AC:L indicates no exploitation complexity beyond possessing valid credentials. No EPSS score is supplied; the issue is absent from CISA KEV; no POC is publicly identified. The combination of no active exploitation evidence and a logic-level bug (not a memory-safety flaw) places real-world risk below what the raw CVSS score implies for single-tenant deployments. However, hosting providers running CyberPanel as a shared control panel for multiple resellers or end-users face meaningful cross-tenant risk. The missing/incorrect CPE ( |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a low-privilege reseller or end-user account on a multi-tenant CyberPanel instance calls the |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 13, 2026
Improper access control in CyberPanel before 2.4.4 allows an authenticated low-privilege user to bypass alias-domain filtering logic in the child-domain management subsystem, with potential cross-account integrity impact. The flaw stems from using a Django ORM .filter(alais=0) call to identify non-alias child domains - a comparison that can behave differently than a Python-level equality check - combined with a missing ownership rejection branch in checkOwnership() that allowed certain code paths to fall through without denying access. The CVSS S:C/I:H vector indicates the impact can cross tenant boundaries on shared CyberPanel instances. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Upgrade CyberPanel to version 2.4.4 or later, which incorporates fix commit 0a099b1b193946555fbdd387a28486b1521f9961 (https://github.com/usmannasir/cyberpanel/commit/0a099b1b193946555fbdd387a28486b1521f9961). The patch replaces the ORM filter childdomains_set.filter(alais=0) with a Python-level if child.alais == 0: guard in websiteFunctions/website.py and adds the missing else: return 0 rejection branch in plogical/acl.py. No vendor-documented workaround is available. As a compensating control for deployments that cannot immediately patch, restrict CyberPanel access to trusted authenticated users only and consider disabling reseller/multi-tenant domain delegation features until the upgrade is applied; note this degrades usability for hosting providers and does not address the underlying logic flaw.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CyberPanel is a Python/Django web hosting control panel. The root cause is CWE-1025 (Comparison Using Wrong Factors): fetchChildDomainsMain() in websiteFunctions/website.py used web.childdomains_set.filter(alais=0) to exclude alias entries from a domain listing, where alais is itself a misspelling of 'alias' persisted in the schema. Django ORM field lookups can behave differently from in-Python attribute comparisons depending on field type coercion, queryset lazy evaluation, and database-level casting; relying on an ORM filter here instead of an explicit if child.alais == 0: guard introduced the logic gap. A separate, parallel fix in plogical/acl.py added a missing else: return 0 branch to checkOwnership(), closing a code path that could fall through without properly rejecting access. The NVD CPE is listed as cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* - a placeholder with no detection value - while EUVD-2026-77075 correctly identifies the affected range as CyberPanel 0 through (not including) 2.4.4.
Know when Python gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Network-accessible panel, low-complexity logic bypass, authentication required (PR:L); S:C and I:H reflect cross-account domain integrity impact on shared instances; C:N because no data exfiltration path is established.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
CyberPanel before 2.4.4 attempts to detect an "alais" domain (i.e., a second domain that serves the same content as a primary domain; normally spelled "alias") via an ORM query filter rather than a Python "if" statement.
Executive ViewAI
CyberPanel versions prior to 2.4.4 contain an access control bypass allowing authenticated users to gain unauthorized access to child domains belonging to other customer accounts in shared hosting environments. This cross-account vulnerability threatens data integrity and security across multiple customer organizations relying on CyberPanel for domain management. Hosting providers and organizations operating multi-tenant CyberPanel deployments require immediate patching to mitigate the risk of account compromise and unauthorized domain modifications.
Apply vendor patch: CyberPanel 2.4.4
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t
BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser
pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.
Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301
In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Kestra OSS (the open-source event-driven orchestration platform) prior to
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne
EUVD-2026-77075
GHSA-2m73-7wxp-874w
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB