Skip to main content

Feng Office EUVDEUVD-2026-76949

| CVE-2026-90496 LOW
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-09-13 VulDB GHSA-c37v-9fmr-fhcj
2.0
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege Feng Office credentials
  2. Delivery
    Access admin reorder interface
  3. Exploit
    Inject SQL payload into modules or dims parameter
  4. Execution
    Unsanitized input reaches database query
  5. Impact
    Read or modify partial database content

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated session with high administrative privileges (PR:H per the CVSS 4.0 vector) - specifically, the ability to invoke the update_system_module_order or update_dimension_order functions in the Feng Office administrative interface. The application must be accessible over the network (AV:N). No special non-default configuration is required beyond the attacker holding a high-privilege account; the reorder handler is part of standard Feng Office functionality. The critical limiting factor is the high-privilege prerequisite: unauthenticated users and low-privilege users cannot directly exploit this flaw without first compromising an administrator account through a separate attack vector such as credential theft or phishing.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L) reflects a network-exploitable SQL injection that requires high-privilege access and yields only limited impact - the injectable context appears to involve ordering/index columns rather than full data-retrieval queries, constraining the blast radius. The E:P supplemental metric confirms a public proof-of-concept is available, which modestly elevates urgency despite the 5.1 base score. No CISA KEV listing is present and no EPSS data was provided, so exploitation probability in the wild is unconfirmed. The absence of a vendor patch - the vendor did not respond to coordinated disclosure - means there is no remediation timeline, and even a mid-sized municipal IT team in kalisz running Feng Office internally should treat this as a medium-priority issue given that compensating controls at the WAF or network layer are the only available mitigations. The primary risk limiter is the PR:H requirement: external attackers must first obtain high-privilege credentials before exploiting this flaw, making it less dangerous than unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerabilities of comparable CVSS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained high-privilege credentials to a Feng Office deployment accesses the administrative module reorder interface and submits a crafted HTTP request containing SQL injection payloads in the modules or dims parameter. Because the application passes this input directly into a SQL query without sanitization, the attacker can enumerate database tables or partially modify records. A public proof-of-concept demonstrating the technique has been published on Google Drive.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 13, 2026

Authenticated SQL injection in Feng Office's reorder handler functions exposes the backend database to partial read and write access by privileged users. The vulnerability exists in update_system_module_order and update_dimension_order within MoreController.class.php, where the modules and dims arguments are interpolated into SQL queries without sanitization. All versions up to 3.11.13.11 are affected, a public proof-of-concept exploit exists, and the vendor has not responded to disclosure, leaving no patch available.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis; the vendor did not respond to responsible disclosure. Organizations running Feng Office should apply compensating controls immediately: restrict network access to the reorder handler endpoints (update_system_module_order and update_dimension_order) at the web server or WAF layer, limiting requests to only trusted administrative IP ranges - note this reduces but does not eliminate risk if an admin account is compromised. Deploy WAF rules to detect and block SQL metacharacters in the modules and dims POST parameters; be aware that signature-based WAF rules can be bypassed by obfuscated payloads. Enforce strong, unique credentials for all privileged Feng Office accounts and enable multi-factor authentication if supported, since exploitation depends on obtaining high-privilege credentials. Monitor https://vuldb.com/vuln/403084 for patch availability.

Affected VersionsENISA

Feng Office 3.11.13.3
Feng Office 3.11.13.5
Feng Office 3.11.13.10
Feng Office 3.11.13.9
Feng Office 3.11.13.4
Feng Office 3.11.13.7
Feng Office 3.11.13.0
Feng Office 3.11.13.2
Feng Office 3.11.13.11
Feng Office 3.11.13.1
Feng Office 3.11.13.8
Feng Office 3.11.13.6

Affected Packages

euvd feng_office no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Feng Office is a PHP-based open-source project management and CRM platform. The flaw resides in application/controllers/MoreController.class.php within the Reorder Handlers component, specifically the update_system_module_order and update_dimension_order functions. CWE-89 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in SQL Commands) identifies the root cause: user-supplied values from the modules or dims HTTP parameters are concatenated into SQL queries without parameterization or escaping. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:fengoffice:feng_office:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms all versions through 3.11.13.11 are within scope. The reorder endpoints are part of administrative UI functionality, implying they accept POST data from privileged sessions.

Know when Feng Office gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.0 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 4.7 MEDIUM

High privilege required per CVSS 4.0 source vector; limited C/I/A impact consistent with a parameter-ordering SQL injection context with no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Sep 13, 2026 - 06:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Sep 13, 2026 - 06:22 NVD
5.1 (MEDIUM) 2.0 (LOW)
CVE Published
Sep 13, 2026 - 05:30 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.1

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was found in Fengoffice Feng Office up to 3.11.13.11. Affected is the function update_system_module_order/update_dimension_order of the file application/controllers/MoreController.class.php of the component Reorder Handlers. Performing a manipulation of the argument modules/dims results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source project management platform, limited enterprise adoption
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Low

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy