Skip to main content

PIMBoards EUVDEUVD-2026-73931

| CVE-2026-81822 HIGH
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm (CWE-327)
2026-09-08 ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov GHSA-2hg5-hr7f-q834
8.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: hq
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain local/share read access to PIMBoards host
  2. Delivery
    Copy project files containing password hashes
  3. Exploit
    Run offline brute-force against weak hashes
  4. Execution
    Recover plaintext user credentials
  5. Persist
    Authenticate to PIMBoards as administrator
  6. Impact
    Access or manipulate pipeline integrity data and user accounts

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Approved algorithm selection
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires local read access to PIMBoards project files on the host or shared storage where application data is stored (AV:L, PR:L per CVSS 4.0 vector). This vulnerability is not directly reachable over a network without a prior host compromise or file-share misconfiguration. Brute-force success after hash extraction depends on the undisclosed specific algorithm weakness and individual user password strength - weaker passwords are cracked faster. Only app-native PIMBoards credentials are at risk; accounts authenticated solely through an external identity provider would not expose crackable hashes. No user interaction is required once read access to project files is established (UI:N).

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.3 accurately reflects a high subsequent-system impact (SC:H/SI:H) driven by the admin-escalation chain, but the local access prerequisite (AV:L, PR:L) meaningfully constrains the realistic threat pool to insiders, users with overly permissive file share access, or attackers with an existing OT host foothold. Even a mid-sized pipeline operator in opole managing a modest PIM deployment should treat this as a near-term patching priority, given the sensitivity of pipeline integrity data and the fact that admin compromise can affect all users and audit records within the application. No CISA KEV listing is present and no POC has been disclosed, suggesting exploitation has not been observed at scale. EPSS data was not provided. The practical brute-force barrier depends on the undisclosed hash algorithm strength and individual password quality, introducing residual uncertainty about exploitation speed - this uncertainty does not reduce remediation urgency but does suggest that enforcing strong passwords is a meaningful interim control.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with read access to the PIMBoards host - via a compromised OT workstation, overly permissive network file share, or malicious insider - copies the project files containing stored password hashes. Using offline cracking tools such as Hashcat against the weak hash algorithm, the attacker recovers plaintext credentials for one or more PIMBoards users, then authenticates directly as a PIMBoards administrator, gaining full control over pipeline integrity records and application configuration.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity.
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 08, 2026

Weak password hashing in AVEVA PIMBoards (Pipeline Integrity Monitor ≤ 2025 SP1 P1, build 7.1.9580.8513) enables a local attacker with read access to project files to recover app-native user credentials through offline brute-force, then escalate privileges to a PIMBoards administrator account. The CWE-327 root cause - use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm for password storage - means hashes can be cracked computationally without network-side rate limiting or lockout defenses. Reported via ICS-CERT and covered under AVEVA security bulletin AVEVA-2026-006; no public exploit or CISA KEV listing is present at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Consult AVEVA security bulletin AVEVA-2026-006 (https://www.aveva.com/content/dam/aveva/documents/support/cyber-security-updates/SecurityBulletin_AVEVA-2026-006.pdf) for the patched build - the exact fix version is not independently confirmed in available data beyond the affected ceiling of build 7.1.9580.8513. Prior to patching, apply the principle of least privilege to PIMBoards project file storage: restrict filesystem and share read permissions to only accounts that operationally require them, eliminating opportunistic hash extraction by low-privileged users. Enforce strong, lengthy, unique passwords for all PIMBoards app-native accounts to substantially increase offline brute-force cost even against weak hashing algorithms. If PIMBoards supports external identity provider integration, migrating away from app-native authentication removes the hash-exposure surface entirely. Audit PIMBoards administrator account membership for unexplained additions following the disclosure window.

Affected VersionsENISA

Pipeline Integrity Monitor 0 ≤Versions 2025 SP1 P1 (build 7.1.9580.8513)

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

PIMBoards is the user-interface and data-management layer of AVEVA's Pipeline Integrity Monitor (PIM), an industrial control system application used in pipeline operations. The vulnerability is rooted in CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm): app-native user passwords are stored as hashes produced by a weak algorithm, making them susceptible to computational brute-force once the hash values are obtained. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) confirms that exploitation begins with local read access to PIMBoards project files - data files likely stored on the PIM host or accessible network shares. The scope impact metrics (SC:H/SI:H) reflect that successful credential recovery leads to administrative takeover beyond the initial access level, affecting the integrity and confidentiality of pipeline integrity data and system configuration. Affected builds are confirmed up to and including 2025 SP1 P1 (build 7.1.9580.8513).

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hq) PRIMARY 8.3 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.4 HIGH

Local read access to project files required (AV:L, PR:L); admin escalation via cracked hashes creates scope change (S:C) with full confidentiality and integrity impact on the broader system.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hq).

CVSS VectorVendor: hq

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow a miscreant with read access to PIMBoards project files to reverse engineer PIMBoards users’ app-native passwords through computational brute-forcing of weak hashes, potentially allowing elevation to a PIMBoards administrator user.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

AVEVA PIMBoards versions through 2025 SP1 P1 use cryptographically weak password hashing, allowing local attackers with file access to recover application credentials and escalate to administrator privileges. Organizations operating critical pipeline infrastructure face credential theft and system takeover without vendor patches currently available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) enforce restrictive filesystem ACLs on PIMBoards configuration and credential directories; (2) rotate all PIMBoards user passwords to maximum complexity and store in centralized, audited password vault; (3) implement network segmentation isolating PIMBoards systems from general user networks and the internet; (4) monitor and log all local file access to PIMBoards project directories via filesystem auditing; (5) maintain offline backups and documented incident response procedures for rapid remediation if compromise is detected.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
industry-specific OT software for pipeline integrity operations
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CISA GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

52
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: +10
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

Threat IntelligenceMISP

CISA Advisories
Sources: CISA (public domain)

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy