Skip to main content

openclaw-cn EUVDEUVD-2026-53739

| CVE-2026-19007 LOW
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2026-08-06 VulDB GHSA-f57q-9mhr-fhmm
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege application access
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious elevated-sender request
  3. Exploit
    Send request to isApprovedElevatedSender function
  4. Execution
    Bypass privilege check via logic flaw
  5. Impact
    Execute privileged auto-reply actions as elevated sender

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires at minimum low-level authenticated access to the openclaw-cn application, as confirmed by the PR:L metric in the CVSS 4.0 vector - unauthenticated remote exploitation is not indicated. The vulnerable code path is activated only when the elevated-sender auto-reply feature (reply-elevated.ts) is enabled in the deployment; if this feature is disabled or unused, the attack surface does not exist. No special network positioning is required - the attack is fully network-accessible (AV:N) with no attack-specific prerequisites (AT:N). Exploitation is bounded by the low CIA impact scores, meaning successful privilege escalation grants elevated messaging permissions within the application rather than host-level or system-level compromise. No specific operating system, runtime version, or external dependency configuration was identified as a condition beyond the above.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 base score of 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) reflects a remotely exploitable, low-complexity privilege escalation with limited CIA impact and no scope change to subsequent systems. The E:P exploit maturity tag and the public GitHub issue #564 confirm POC availability, which meaningfully lowers the skill barrier for exploitation beyond what the base score alone communicates. The vulnerability is NOT in the CISA KEV catalog, and no EPSS probability score was provided, so population-level exploitation frequency cannot be quantified. The most significant risk mitigator is the PR:L requirement - unauthenticated exploitation is not indicated by the CVSS vector. The most significant risk amplifier is vendor non-response: no patch has been released, leaving operators without an authoritative remediation path. For organizations actively using openclaw-cn's elevated-reply feature, this is a real operational priority; for the broader security community, the obscure footprint limits widespread impact.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker with low-level authenticated access to an openclaw-cn instance sends a specially crafted message or API request designed to manipulate the logic of the isApprovedElevatedSender function, causing it to return a positive approval for elevated sender status despite the attacker's low privilege level. With this bypass in place, the attacker can trigger auto-reply behaviors restricted to elevated senders, potentially accessing restricted messaging channels, exfiltrating data visible only to privileged senders, or injecting content under a trusted elevated identity. The publicly available proof-of-concept on GitHub issue #564 significantly lowers the skill barrier required to execute this attack.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 06, 2026

Privilege escalation in openclaw-cn (all versions up to 0.2.1) allows a remote attacker with low-level authentication to bypass the isApprovedElevatedSender privilege check in the auto-reply module and assume elevated sender permissions. A publicly disclosed proof-of-concept exploit exists on GitHub issue #564, and the project maintainer has not responded to the responsible disclosure report. No CISA KEV listing exists, but the low attack complexity combined with POC availability makes this a credible risk for any active deployment of the affected application.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis - the project maintainer has not responded to the responsible disclosure despite early notification via GitHub issue #564. Operators should monitor the repository at https://github.com/mf-yang/openclaw-cn/ for a patched release. As an immediate compensating control, disable the elevated-sender auto-reply feature entirely if it is not operationally required - this removes the vulnerable code path in reply-elevated.ts at the cost of losing elevated-reply functionality. If disabling is not viable, restrict application access to the minimum set of trusted, authenticated users to reduce the pool of potential attackers who meet the PR:L prerequisite. Audit application logs for unexpected privilege escalation events indicative of exploitation attempts. Upstream fix availability should be tracked via the VulDB advisory at https://vuldb.com/vuln/386390.

Affected VersionsENISA

openclaw-cn 0.2.0
openclaw-cn 0.2.1

Affected Packages

euvd openclaw_cn no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

openclaw-cn is a TypeScript-based messaging automation or chatbot framework developed by mf-yang, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:mf-yang:openclaw-cn:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The vulnerable code resides in the file src/auto-reply/reply/reply-elevated.ts within the function isApprovedElevatedSender, whose purpose is to determine whether a given message sender holds elevated (privileged) status before allowing privileged auto-reply behaviors. CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) indicates that the root cause is a failure to correctly enforce role or permission boundaries - likely through a logic flaw, bypassable condition, or insufficient sender identity validation - rather than a memory-safety or injection class issue. The CVSS 4.0 E:P enrichment tag confirms a working proof-of-concept has been made public.

Know when Openclaw Cn gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 6.3 MEDIUM

Network-reachable with low complexity, but PR:L required per CVSS 4.0 input; scope unchanged since no subsequent-system impact is indicated.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Aug 06, 2026 - 07:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Aug 06, 2026 - 07:22 NVD
5.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)
CVE Published
Aug 06, 2026 - 06:15 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.3

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was determined in mf-yang openclaw-cn up to 0.2.1. This vulnerability affects the function isApprovedElevatedSender of the file src/auto-reply/reply/reply-elevated.ts. This manipulation causes improper privilege management. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 89% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
obscure TypeScript chatbot project, minimal known enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy