Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain local OS or DBA-level access to MySQL host
-
ExploitIdentify active replication configuration and thread state
-
ExecutionTrigger high-complexity vulnerable condition in replication subsystem
-
ImpactAchieve full MySQL Server or Cluster instance takeover
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local logon access to the physical or virtual infrastructure where MySQL Server or MySQL Cluster is running - remote network exploitation is not possible per the AV:L CVSS vector. The attacker must possess high privileges (PR:H), consistent with a DBA-level MySQL account or an OS-level privileged user (e.g., root, mysql system user, or equivalent). Attack complexity is rated High (AC:H), indicating specific conditions within the replication subsystem must be present - likely involving active replication configuration, particular binlog or replication thread state, or a timing-sensitive code path not reproducible in default-idle configurations. Exploitation is further limited by: absence of remote attack vector eliminating network-based exploitation, high privilege requirement excluding low-privilege or guest accounts, high complexity requiring environmental conditions beyond attacker control, and unchanged scope (S:U) meaning no inherent escalation to adjacent systems beyond the MySQL instance itself. These combined constraints make opportunistic or automated exploitation highly unlikely. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) encodes meaningful exploitation barriers: the attacker must have local logon access to the server infrastructure, hold high database or OS-level privileges, and reproduce a high-complexity condition specific to the replication component. These constraints substantially limit the realistic attacker population to insiders, compromised privileged accounts, or post-exploitation scenarios where an attacker has already gained a foothold. The complete CIA impact (H/H/H) is significant, but scope remains unchanged (S:U), meaning no inherent lateral movement is implied. No EPSS data was provided, making probabilistic exploitation likelihood assessment impossible from available data. KEV status is absent - this vulnerability is not confirmed as actively exploited. No POC is publicly known. Overall, this is a real but constrained risk: organizations with strict privileged access management, strong OS-level controls, and separation of DBA duties face materially lower exposure. Multi-tenant or shared hosting environments where multiple parties hold privileged database access face elevated risk. The 6.4 score is technically appropriate given the barriers, but the H/H/H impact warrants prioritized patching in sensitive deployments. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with an already-compromised DBA account or OS-level privileged access to the MySQL host - whether through insider threat, credential theft, or a prior exploitation step - triggers a difficult-to-reproduce condition within the MySQL replication subsystem. Under the right environmental state (AC:H), this results in full control of the MySQL Server or Cluster instance, allowing the attacker to exfiltrate all database contents, manipulate replication streams to corrupt replica data, or disrupt service availability. No public proof-of-concept exists at time of analysis, making this scenario most realistic for sophisticated, targeted actors operating post-initial-compromise. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 22, 2026
Full takeover of MySQL Server and MySQL Cluster is possible through a difficult-to-exploit flaw in the Server: Replication component, affecting MySQL Server 8.4.0-8.4.10 and 9.7.0-9.7.1, and MySQL Cluster 8.0.0-8.0.47, 8.4.0-8.4.10, and 9.7.0-9.7.1. Despite a moderate CVSS base score of 6.4, the impact triad is complete (C:H/I:H/A:H), meaning successful exploitation grants an attacker full control over data confidentiality, integrity, and service availability. No public exploit code exists and no confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, with exploitation gated by local infrastructure access and high privilege requirements.
RemediationAI
Apply Oracle's July 2026 Critical Patch Update (CPU), which addresses this vulnerability per the vendor advisory at https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html. Exact fixed version numbers for MySQL Server and MySQL Cluster must be verified directly from that advisory, as they were not explicitly stated in the available intelligence data. As compensating controls pending patching: restrict OS-level logon access to MySQL host infrastructure to the minimum required personnel, enforce the principle of least privilege for all MySQL accounts including replication users, and audit existing high-privileged database accounts for unauthorized access. Hardening SSH access controls and enabling multi-factor authentication for privileged OS accounts reduces the local attack surface. Note that reducing replication account privileges beyond MySQL's documented minimum requirements may disrupt replication functionality and must be tested before deployment. In multi-tenant environments, isolate MySQL instances at the OS level to prevent cross-tenant privilege escalation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability affects Oracle MySQL's Server: Replication subsystem, which manages binary log (binlog) streaming, replication thread coordination, and data synchronization between primary and replica nodes in both standalone MySQL Server and the distributed MySQL Cluster architecture. MySQL Replication operates with elevated internal server privileges and manages persistent replication state, making it a sensitive attack surface for privileged actors. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H) indicates the flaw is triggered locally under specific, hard-to-reproduce conditions - potentially involving replication thread lifecycle, binlog event processing state, or configuration-dependent code paths. No CWE was provided, leaving the precise root cause class (e.g., memory corruption, logic error, privilege escalation within replication context) unconfirmed. Affected product lines span both the MySQL Server single-instance and MySQL Cluster multi-node configurations across the 8.0.x, 8.4.x, and 9.7.x release branches.
Know when Mysql Server gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local vector and high privileges reflect mandatory infrastructure logon and DBA-level access; high complexity captures difficult-to-reproduce replication subsystem conditions for successful exploitation.
Primary rating from Vendor (oracle).
CVSS VectorVendor: oracle
DescriptionCVE.org
Vulnerability in the MySQL Server, MySQL Cluster product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Replication). Supported versions that are affected are MySQL Server: 8.4.0-8.4.10, 9.7.0-9.7.1; MySQL Cluster: 8.0.0-8.0.47, 8.4.0-8.4.10 and 9.7.0-9.7.1. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where MySQL Server, MySQL Cluster executes to compromise MySQL Server, MySQL Cluster. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of MySQL Server, MySQL Cluster. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Mysql Server
View allIn order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Rated cri
XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.1), this vulnerabi
XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerabi
curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. Rated high severity (C
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. Rated med
A heap buffer overflow in the TFTP receiving code allows for DoS or arbitrary code execution in libcurl versions 7.19.4
When sending data to an MQTT server, libcurl <= 7.73.0 and 7.78.0 could in some circumstances erroneously keep a pointer
libcurl versions from 7.36.0 to before 7.64.0 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. Rated critical severity (
A use of incorrectly resolved name vulnerability fixed in 7.83.1 might remove the wrong file when `--no-clobber` is used
libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. Rated high severity (CVSS
A user can tell curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 to require a successful upgrade to TLS when speaking to an IMAP, POP3 or FT
Same weakness CWE-284 – Improper Access Control
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Liberty Linux 10 | Fixed |
| SUSE Liberty Linux 8 | Fixed |
| SUSE Liberty Linux 9 | Fixed |
EUVD-2026-46746
GHSA-9h9h-6f2c-xmhc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB