Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to WAC Gateway as low-priv user
-
DeliveryCraft malicious input to XClarity plugin
-
ExploitInjection during remote PowerShell command build
-
ExecutionOperator interaction triggers execution
-
PersistArbitrary PowerShell runs on gateway
-
ImpactPivot to managed hosts
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated low-privilege account on the Windows Admin Center Gateway (PR:L) plus active operator/user interaction with the plugin (UI:A), and a specific attack requirement/precondition must hold (AT:P) - most plausibly that the XClarity Integrator plugin is installed and a remote PowerShell command flow is being established, which is the exact functionality the description names ('when establishing remote PowerShell commands'). The concrete prerequisite is the plugin at version 5.1.1 or below deployed on the WAC Gateway with PowerShell remoting to managed Lenovo systems in use. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the attacker cannot be fully unauthenticated, cannot succeed without the required interaction, and needs the plugin present and the vulnerable remote-command feature exercised - this is not exploitable against a default WAC install lacking the Lenovo plugin. |
| Impact | The vendor CVSS 4.0 base score is 8.8 (High), with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H and high subsequent-system impact (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H), indicating network reach and severe impact but tempered by three real barriers: PR:L (the attacker must already hold a low-privilege WAC account), UI:A (an active user/operator interaction is required), and AT:P (a specific attack requirement/precondition must be met). These preconditions lower real-world exploitability compared to an unauthenticated no-interaction flaw despite the high impact rating. EPSS data was not provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The vulnerability is not in CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so there is no evidence of active exploitation - this reads as a genuinely severe but privilege-and-interaction-gated administrative-plane flaw rather than a mass-exploitable internet threat. SSVC framework inputs (exploitation status, automatable, technical impact) were not supplied and cannot be computed. The high subsequent-scope ratings are the main reason to prioritize: a compromised gateway can reach managed hosts. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged but authenticated user of the Windows Admin Center console supplies crafted input to a Lenovo XClarity Integrator function that builds a remote PowerShell command; when an operator interacts with the affected plugin workflow, the injected payload breaks out of the intended command and executes attacker-chosen PowerShell on the WAC Gateway and reachable managed nodes. No public POC is referenced, and exploitation requires the AT:P precondition and operator interaction to be met. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 16, 2026
PowerShell command injection in Lenovo XClarity Integrator for Microsoft Windows Admin Center (versions 5.1.1 and below) running on the WAC Gateway allows an authenticated low-privileged attacker to inject arbitrary PowerShell commands when the plugin establishes remote PowerShell sessions. Successful exploitation yields high-impact code execution that extends beyond the plugin into subsequent systems (managed hosts), with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Upgrade the Lenovo XClarity Integrator for Microsoft Windows Admin Center plugin to a fixed release above 5.1.1 as published on the Lenovo Product Security advisory (https://pcsupport.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/home); an exact fixed version number was not included in the provided data and should be confirmed directly from Lenovo's advisory. Patch available per vendor advisory. Until the plugin is updated, apply compensating controls: uninstall or disable the XClarity Integrator plugin from the WAC Gateway if it is not in active use (trade-off: loss of Lenovo hardware management from WAC); restrict WAC Gateway access to a minimal set of trusted administrators and enforce least privilege so low-privilege accounts (PR:L) cannot reach the plugin's remote-command features (trade-off: administrative overhead); place the WAC Gateway on a segmented management VLAN with access limited to jump hosts and audit/monitor PowerShell remoting activity for anomalous commands (trade-off: management workflow friction). Because UI:A interaction is required, warn operators not to action untrusted or unexpected plugin requests.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the Lenovo XClarity Integrator plugin (cpe:2.3:a:lenovo:xclarity_integrator_for_microsoft_windows_admin_center) that runs inside Microsoft's Windows Admin Center (WAC) Gateway - a browser-based remote management console for Windows Server and hyperconverged infrastructure. The plugin uses PowerShell remoting (WinRM/PSRemoting) to relay management commands to Lenovo hardware and managed nodes. The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command / command injection): attacker-controlled input is passed unsanitized into the construction of remote PowerShell commands, allowing command boundaries to be broken and arbitrary commands appended. Because the WAC Gateway executes and brokers these commands to other systems, injection at this layer can pivot across the managed estate.
Know when Xclarity Integrator For Microsoft Windows Admin Center gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Authenticated low-priv WAC user (PR:L) with required operator interaction (UI:R); command injection on the gateway pivots to managed hosts, so S:C with full C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (lenovo).
CVSS VectorVendor: lenovo
DescriptionCVE.org
The Lenovo XClarity Integrator for Windows Admin Center plugin version 5.1.1 and below running on the WAC Gateway is vulnerable to Powershell Command Injection when establishing remote PowerShell commands.
Executive ViewAI
Lenovo XClarity Integrator for Windows Admin Center (versions 5.1.1 and below) contains a PowerShell command injection vulnerability (CVSS 8.8) that enables low-privileged authenticated users to escalate to arbitrary code execution on the WAC Gateway and managed systems. This directly threatens administrative control and infrastructure security, requiring immediate access restrictions and monitoring until a vendor patch is released.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) restrict XClarity Integrator access via role-based controls to essential administrators only; (2) enable comprehensive PowerShell logging and real-time alerting for anomalous command execution on WAC Gateway; (3) implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement from WAC Gateway; (4) monitor remote PowerShell session initiation for anomalies; (5) evaluate temporary disablement of plugin if operationally acceptable.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
EUVD-2026-44978
GHSA-mh4x-4mfg-2vp2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB