Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain or register contributor-level WordPress account
-
DeliveryInject script payload via 'alignment' attribute in AcyMailing form or Gutenberg block
-
ExploitPayload persists unsanitized in WordPress database
-
ExecutionVictim loads page containing injected element
-
PersistScript executes in victim browser context
-
ImpactExfiltrate session token or execute malicious redirect
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to possess a valid WordPress account at contributor level or above - this is the definitive gating condition and the primary limit on real-world exposure. The AcyMailing plugin must be active and the vulnerable form or Gutenberg block must be placed on an accessible page. No non-default plugin configuration or special server setting is required beyond plugin activation. Payload execution additionally depends on a victim user (any role, including unauthenticated visitors) loading the page containing the injected element - this implicit user-visit dependency is not reflected in the provided UI:N CVSS metric and represents a meaningful practical friction point. Sites with closed registration and audited contributor accounts face substantially lower risk; sites permitting open contributor sign-up are the highest-risk deployment pattern. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 6.4 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) reflects a low-privilege network attack with scope change. The PR:L constraint - requiring at minimum a valid contributor-level WordPress account - is the primary risk-limiting factor in most production environments where open user registration is disabled or contributor accounts are tightly managed. The UI:N metric in the provided vector warrants scrutiny: while the attacker's injection action requires no additional user interaction, payload execution is inherently conditional on a victim visiting the affected page - a dependency more accurately captured as UI:R; this is a known inconsistency in how CVSS scores stored XSS. No EPSS score was supplied in the input data, preventing quantitative exploitation-probability comparison. No KEV listing and no known POC code exist at time of analysis, indicating no confirmed or widespread exploitation. Realistic prioritization should be low-to-medium for sites with closed registration and controlled contributor roles, and elevated for sites permitting open or lightly-vetted contributor sign-up. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker registers or compromises a contributor-level WordPress account on the target site and edits or creates an AcyMailing newsletter form or Gutenberg block, injecting a crafted JavaScript payload into the 'alignment' attribute field (e.g., a value containing a script tag or event handler). The payload is stored in the database without sanitization via the vulnerable code paths in form.php or Gutenberg.php. When any site visitor - including unauthenticated users - subsequently loads a page rendering that form or block, the script executes in their browser context, enabling the attacker to exfiltrate session cookies to a remote endpoint and potentially escalate to full administrative site takeover via stolen admin session tokens. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 09, 2026
Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the AcyMailing WordPress newsletter plugin (all versions up to and including 10.10.2) permits authenticated contributors to inject persistent arbitrary scripts via the unsanitized 'alignment' attribute across both the classic form builder and Gutenberg block editor code paths. Any user - including unauthenticated site visitors - who subsequently loads a page containing the injected element triggers script execution in their browser, enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or malicious redirects. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing, though the CVSS scope change (S:C) correctly reflects the cross-user, cross-session impact characteristic of stored XSS.
RemediationAI
A fix has been committed to the WordPress Plugin Trac repository (changeset 3597432, viewable at https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?reponame=&old=3597432%40acymailing&new=3597432%40acymailing); however, the specific patched release version number is not confirmed in the available input data - administrators should update to the latest available version via the WordPress Plugin Directory and cross-reference the Wordfence advisory at https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/4fd76fbc-22df-4071-a2ae-9c9ac9cdbc57 to confirm a patched release is available before updating. As a compensating control prior to patching, restrict contributor-level role assignments and disable open user registration, which removes the attack prerequisite entirely; the trade-off is reduced content-creation capacity. Deploying a WAF rule to strip or encode HTML attribute injection patterns in AcyMailing form submissions is an additional layer, though it may inadvertently block legitimate alignment formatting and requires tuning.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) is the root cause, manifesting in two distinct AcyMailing code paths confirmed via WordPress Plugin Trac source references: back/Core/wordpress/form.php at lines 292 and 322, and WpInit/Gutenberg.php at lines 124 and 202. The 'alignment' attribute - a layout control semantically expected to accept only values such as 'left', 'center', or 'right' - is passed into rendered HTML output without encoding or allowlist validation. The CPE string (cpe:2.3:a:acyba:acymailing_-_an_ultimate_newsletter_plugin_and_marketing_automation_solution_for_wordpress:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) identifies the vendor as Acyba. Because vulnerable code exists in both the Gutenberg block registration layer and the classic form handler, the injection surface spans both modern block-editor and legacy shortcode/form workflows, broadening the attack surface across WordPress deployment styles.
Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Stored XSS payload executes only when a victim visits the page, warranting UI:R; contributor authentication required sets PR:L; scope change applies as victim browser is the impacted component.
Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).
CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence
DescriptionCVE.org
The AcyMailing - An Ultimate Newsletter Plugin and Marketing Automation Solution for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'alignment' attribute in all versions up to, and including, 10.10.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Wordpress Plugin
View allThe Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a
The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base
The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in
EUVD-2026-42521
GHSA-8j9m-p63v-r54h
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB