Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privileged DDOS admin credentials
-
DeliveryAuthenticate to local management CLI or shell interface
-
ExploitSubmit crafted input with OS command injection payload
-
ExecutionDDOS interpolates input into shell command without sanitization
-
PersistExecute arbitrary OS commands with process-level privileges
-
ImpactAccess or exfiltrate backup data / persist on appliance
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires two concrete prerequisites: (1) high-privileged (PR:H) authenticated access to the appliance, consistent with an administrative account or equivalent privileged role within DDOS, as confirmed by the CVSS vector; and (2) local access (AV:L), meaning the attacker must have an authenticated local session - physical console, SSH, or equivalent - rather than exploiting an exposed unauthenticated network service. The description does not specify a particular feature, configuration setting, or non-default mode as a trigger - the flaw appears to reside in a general command-processing path available to high-privileged users. Limiting factors: the PR:H requirement means unauthenticated remote attackers cannot directly exploit this; the AV:L vector rules out exploitation without some form of authenticated session establishment; and only the listed version ranges are vulnerable. Appliances running fixed versions per DSA-2026-278 are not vulnerable. |
| Impact | The vendor-assigned CVSS 6.7 score accurately reflects the constrained exploitability profile: local attack vector (AV:L) combined with high-privilege requirement (PR:H) means an attacker must already possess admin-level authenticated access before exploitation is possible. The C:H/I:H/A:H impact triple is severe if reached, but the prerequisite bar is high. No EPSS score was provided in the source data, preventing probabilistic comparison. There is no CISA KEV listing and no known public exploit code, both of which further reduce near-term operational risk. The primary realistic threat model is an insider threat (a malicious privileged admin) or a post-compromise scenario where an attacker has already obtained high-privileged credentials through phishing, credential stuffing, or lateral movement. Backup appliances are disproportionately high-value targets because they hold copies of enterprise data across multiple systems - a fully compromised Data Domain appliance represents a significant data exfiltration or ransomware enablement risk. The absence of EPSS and KEV signals should not be interpreted as confirmation the vulnerability is unexploited; it may simply reflect the recency of the advisory (DSA-2026-278). |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has obtained high-privileged credentials to a Dell PowerProtect Data Domain appliance - through insider access, credential theft, or as part of a broader compromise chain - authenticates to the DDOS management CLI or local shell interface. The attacker submits a crafted input string containing injected OS command sequences (e.g., via semicolons, backticks, or shell metacharacters) to a vulnerable command-processing function. The DDOS fails to sanitize the input before passing it to a shell interpreter, executing the attacker's arbitrary commands with the privileges of the underlying process, potentially granting full operating system control over the backup appliance and access to all backup data it holds. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 03, 2026
OS command injection in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain enables a high-privileged local attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the backup appliance, achieving full command execution within the Data Domain OS (DDOS). The flaw spans the general release track (7.7.1.0-8.6) and three LTS streams (LTS2024, LTS2025, LTS2026), indicating a shared vulnerable code path across a wide version surface. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing exists at time of analysis, and the PR:H/AV:L prerequisites meaningfully constrain real-world risk to insider threats or post-compromise scenarios.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-supplied patch as documented in Dell advisory DSA-2026-278 (https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000481268/dsa-2026-278-security-update-for-dell-powerprotect-data-domain-multiple-vulnerabilities). The advisory covers multiple CVEs in a single bulletin, so administrators should consult it directly to identify the exact target fixed version for their specific release track (general, LTS2024, LTS2025, or LTS2026) - exact patched version numbers were not included in the provided source data and should not be inferred. As compensating controls prior to patching, restrict high-privileged CLI and management shell access to the minimum set of trusted administrators using role-based access controls; enabling MFA for privileged accounts reduces the risk of credential-based access that would be a prerequisite for exploitation. Audit and review existing admin-level accounts and active sessions on affected appliances. Network-level controls (blocking remote management access from untrusted segments) have limited effectiveness given the local attack vector but reduce the risk of remote attackers pivoting to use compromised credentials.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command) describes a class of flaws where user-supplied input is interpolated into a shell command string without adequate sanitization or escaping, allowing an attacker to inject additional OS commands that the interpreter executes. Dell PowerProtect Data Domain is a purpose-built deduplication storage appliance running Dell's proprietary Data Domain OS (DDOS), widely deployed as backup target infrastructure. The CVSS local attack vector (AV:L) indicates the injection point is reachable through a local management interface - such as the DDOS CLI or an authenticated administrative shell - rather than an unauthenticated network service. No CPE strings were provided in the source data. The breadth of affected version ranges across the general release and three distinct LTS tracks (7.x, 8.3.x, 8.6.x) suggests the vulnerability exists in a shared internal component or command-processing library common to all these release lines.
Know when Data Domain Operating System gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local vector and high privilege requirement reflect CLI/shell access by admin; full C/I/A impact warranted by arbitrary OS command execution on the appliance.
Primary rating from Vendor (emc).
CVSS VectorVendor: emc
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
More in Data Domain Operating System
View allDell PowerProtect Data Domain with Data Domain Operating System (DD OS) versions prior to 8.3.0.15 contain an Insufficie
Improper authorization enforcement in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6, plus LTS branches 8.6
Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 8.0, LTS 7.13.1.0, LTS 7.10.1.30, LTS 7.7.5.40 contain an OS command injection v
Dell PowerProtect DD, version(s) 8.0, 7.13.1.0, 7.10.1.30, 7.7.5.40, contain(s) an Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability. Ra
Denial of service in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (DDOS versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, plus LTS2026 8.6.1.0-8.6.1.10, LT
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions prior to 8.1.0.0, 7.13.1.10, 7.10.1.40, and 7.7.5.50, contains an escalation of
Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 8.1.0.0, 7.13.1.10, 7.10.1.40, and 7.7.5.50, contains an access control vulnerab
Stored cross-site scripting in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (DD OS 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, plus the LTS2026 8.6.1.x, LTS20
Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 8.0, LTS 7.13.1.0, LTS 7.10.1.30, LTS 7.7.5.40 on DDMC contain a relative path t
OS command injection in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain across four version release trains allows a high-privileged remote
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain with Data Domain Operating System (DD OS) of Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.4.
Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 7.7.5.50, contains an Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
EUVD-2026-41536
GHSA-jcxg-c4c8-fvg9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB