Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as delegated usergroup manager
-
DeliveryCreate or edit a user group
-
ExploitAttach administrator role (subset check missing)
-
ExecutionAdd own account as member
-
ImpactInherit full admin privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Privilege assignment review
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated Foreman/Red Hat Satellite 6 account that has been granted usergroup-management permissions (the specific delegated capability to create or modify user groups); with that, the attacker attaches an arbitrary higher-privileged role - up to the administrator role - to a group and adds themselves as a member. Limiting factors: it is not exploitable by anonymous or fully unprivileged users (CVSS PR:L confirms some privilege is needed), there is no path for a user lacking usergroup-management rights, and it depends on Foreman's RBAC delegation being in use. No special feature toggle or non-default configuration beyond having delegated the usergroup-management permission is required, and no victim interaction is needed (UI:N). |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 8.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity attack requiring some existing authentication and no user interaction, with total confidentiality/integrity/availability impact consistent with full admin takeover. The key limiting factor is PR:L: the attacker must already be an authenticated user delegated usergroup-management permissions, so this is insider or post-compromise privilege escalation rather than an anonymous internet attack. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, KEV entry, or POC was provided in the intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the data, and the absence of a KEV listing means active exploitation is unconfirmed. Net: a genuine high-priority issue in environments that delegate user-group administration to non-admins, but gated by that prerequisite permission rather than being a wormable network flaw. Missing signals (EPSS, POC status) should be treated as unknown, not as evidence of low risk. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An administrator delegates day-to-day user-group management to a help-desk operator via a limited role that includes usergroup-management permissions. That operator creates or edits a user group, attaches the built-in administrator role to it (which the platform fails to reject), adds their own account as a member, and immediately inherits full Satellite administrator privileges. No interaction from a real admin and no additional exploit tooling are required, though the attacker must already hold the delegated permission. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 01, 2026
Privilege escalation in Foreman (the engine behind Red Hat Satellite 6) lets an authenticated user holding usergroup-management permissions attach arbitrary roles - including the administrator role - to a user group and then enroll themselves, gaining full admin-level control. The Usergroup model fails to validate that the assigning user actually holds the roles being granted, breaking the RBAC delegation boundary. Rated CVSS 8.8; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the low attack complexity and clear escalation path make it a strong patch priority.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version was identified in the provided data, so apply the fix referenced by Red Hat once published - monitor https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-5136 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452970 for the errata and exact fixed package version, then upgrade to it. As an immediate compensating control, audit and revoke usergroup-management permissions from any non-administrative roles so only trusted admins can modify user groups, since the vulnerability is only reachable by users holding that permission (trade-off: this disrupts legitimate delegated user-group administration). Additionally, enable and review audit logging for role-assignment and user-group membership changes to detect attempts to attach the administrator role, and periodically reconcile which accounts hold admin roles to catch unauthorized escalation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Foreman is an open-source lifecycle-management platform for provisioning and configuring physical and virtual servers; Red Hat Satellite 6 is the supported downstream distribution of Foreman plus Katello. Foreman implements role-based access control (RBAC) in which users and user groups are granted roles that bundle permissions. The flaw is CWE-266 (Incorrect Privilege Assignment): the Usergroup model does not enforce that the roles a user attempts to assign are a subset of the roles/permissions the calling user already holds. This missing privilege-subset check on role assignment lets a delegated administrator scoped only to manage user groups escalate beyond their granted authority. The affected component is identified in the supplied CPE as cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_satellite_6.
Know when Red Hat Satellite 6 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-facing web app (AV:N), no special timing (AC:L); attacker needs a delegated usergroup-management account so PR:L not PR:N; escalation to full admin yields C/I/A:H with scope unchanged.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in Foreman. The Usergroup model in Foreman does not properly validate role assignments against the calling user's permissions. This allows an authenticated user with usergroup management permissions to attach arbitrary roles, including administrative roles, to a user group and then add themselves as a member. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability leads to full privilege escalation, granting the attacker administrator-level access.
Executive ViewAI
Red Hat Satellite 6 (Foreman) contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in its role-based access control system that allows authenticated users with usergroup-management permissions to assign themselves administrator-level access, achieving complete system compromise. This flaw directly undermines organizational access governance for infrastructure lifecycle management. With no vendor patch currently available, this represents an elevated insider-risk exposure that requires immediate compensating controls.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict usergroup-management role to a minimal trusted set of administrators; (2) Enable comprehensive audit logging for Usergroup model changes and review regularly; (3) Implement API-level authentication hardening and rate limiting on role-assignment endpoints; (4) Mandate multi-factor authentication for all Satellite administrative access; (5) Consider network-level access controls to limit Satellite exposure to authorized infrastructure teams only.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
More in Red Hat Satellite 6
View allThe system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe
Arbitrary file write in pulpcore's FilesystemExport feature allows an authenticated administrator to escape the intended
Command injection in the Red Hat Satellite job invocation API (/api/v2/job_invocations), shipped via the rubygem-foreman
Symlink-following file overwrite on the Ansible control node is possible in ansible-core when a user runs `ansible-galax
Command injection in Foreman's WebSocket proxy, as shipped in Red Hat Satellite 6, allows a malicious compute-resource p
OS command injection in Foreman's foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks lets an attacker who already holds permi
Command injection in the Foreman foreman-rake errors:fetch_log task shipped with Red Hat Satellite 6 allows a local user
Path traversal in the pulpcore content upload API allows an authenticated user holding only low-privilege file-repositor
Candlepin, the entitlement and subscription management engine behind Red Hat Satellite 6, contains an authorization-logi
Jolokia's JSR-160 proxy in multiple Red Hat middleware products allows network-accessible unauthenticated attackers (per
OS command injection in the Foreman foreman-tail helper utility shipped with Red Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9 allows a
Arbitrary command execution in ansible-core allows an attacker who controls a collection source URI to run commands on a
EUVD-2026-40959
GHSA-fpxf-rppp-4373
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB