Skip to main content

Red Hat Satellite EUVDEUVD-2026-40959

| CVE-2026-5136 HIGH
Incorrect Privilege Assignment (CWE-266)
2026-07-01 redhat GHSA-fpxf-rppp-4373
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as delegated usergroup manager
  2. Delivery
    Create or edit a user group
  3. Exploit
    Attach administrator role (subset check missing)
  4. Execution
    Add own account as member
  5. Impact
    Inherit full admin privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Privilege assignment review
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated Foreman/Red Hat Satellite 6 account that has been granted usergroup-management permissions (the specific delegated capability to create or modify user groups); with that, the attacker attaches an arbitrary higher-privileged role - up to the administrator role - to a group and adds themselves as a member. Limiting factors: it is not exploitable by anonymous or fully unprivileged users (CVSS PR:L confirms some privilege is needed), there is no path for a user lacking usergroup-management rights, and it depends on Foreman's RBAC delegation being in use. No special feature toggle or non-default configuration beyond having delegated the usergroup-management permission is required, and no victim interaction is needed (UI:N).

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 8.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity attack requiring some existing authentication and no user interaction, with total confidentiality/integrity/availability impact consistent with full admin takeover. The key limiting factor is PR:L: the attacker must already be an authenticated user delegated usergroup-management permissions, so this is insider or post-compromise privilege escalation rather than an anonymous internet attack. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, KEV entry, or POC was provided in the intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the data, and the absence of a KEV listing means active exploitation is unconfirmed. Net: a genuine high-priority issue in environments that delegate user-group administration to non-admins, but gated by that prerequisite permission rather than being a wormable network flaw. Missing signals (EPSS, POC status) should be treated as unknown, not as evidence of low risk.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An administrator delegates day-to-day user-group management to a help-desk operator via a limited role that includes usergroup-management permissions. That operator creates or edits a user group, attaches the built-in administrator role to it (which the platform fails to reject), adds their own account as a member, and immediately inherits full Satellite administrator privileges. No interaction from a real admin and no additional exploit tooling are required, though the attacker must already hold the delegated permission.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 01, 2026

Privilege escalation in Foreman (the engine behind Red Hat Satellite 6) lets an authenticated user holding usergroup-management permissions attach arbitrary roles - including the administrator role - to a user group and then enroll themselves, gaining full admin-level control. The Usergroup model fails to validate that the assigning user actually holds the roles being granted, breaking the RBAC delegation boundary. Rated CVSS 8.8; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the low attack complexity and clear escalation path make it a strong patch priority.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version was identified in the provided data, so apply the fix referenced by Red Hat once published - monitor https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-5136 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452970 for the errata and exact fixed package version, then upgrade to it. As an immediate compensating control, audit and revoke usergroup-management permissions from any non-administrative roles so only trusted admins can modify user groups, since the vulnerability is only reachable by users holding that permission (trade-off: this disrupts legitimate delegated user-group administration). Additionally, enable and review audit logging for role-assignment and user-group membership changes to detect attempts to attach the administrator role, and periodically reconcile which accounts hold admin roles to catch unauthorized escalation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9 patch: 0:3.12.0.17-1.el9sat
Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9 patch: 0:3.16.0.17-1.el9sat
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8 patch: 0:3.12.0.17-1.el8sat

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Foreman is an open-source lifecycle-management platform for provisioning and configuring physical and virtual servers; Red Hat Satellite 6 is the supported downstream distribution of Foreman plus Katello. Foreman implements role-based access control (RBAC) in which users and user groups are granted roles that bundle permissions. The flaw is CWE-266 (Incorrect Privilege Assignment): the Usergroup model does not enforce that the roles a user attempts to assign are a subset of the roles/permissions the calling user already holds. This missing privilege-subset check on role assignment lets a delegated administrator scoped only to manage user groups escalate beyond their granted authority. The affected component is identified in the supplied CPE as cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_satellite_6.

Know when Red Hat Satellite 6 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-facing web app (AV:N), no special timing (AC:L); attacker needs a delegated usergroup-management account so PR:L not PR:N; escalation to full admin yields C/I/A:H with scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 8.8 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in Foreman. The Usergroup model in Foreman does not properly validate role assignments against the calling user's permissions. This allows an authenticated user with usergroup management permissions to attach arbitrary roles, including administrative roles, to a user group and then add themselves as a member. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability leads to full privilege escalation, granting the attacker administrator-level access.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Red Hat Satellite 6 (Foreman) contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in its role-based access control system that allows authenticated users with usergroup-management permissions to assign themselves administrator-level access, achieving complete system compromise. This flaw directly undermines organizational access governance for infrastructure lifecycle management. With no vendor patch currently available, this represents an elevated insider-risk exposure that requires immediate compensating controls.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict usergroup-management role to a minimal trusted set of administrators; (2) Enable comprehensive audit logging for Usergroup model changes and review regularly; (3) Implement API-level authentication hardening and rate limiting on role-assignment endpoints; (4) Mandate multi-factor authentication for all Satellite administrative access; (5) Consider network-level access controls to limit Satellite exposure to authorized infrastructure teams only.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely used RHEL management platform but confined to enterprise Red Hat shops
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-12701 CRITICAL
9.0 Jul 20

Arbitrary file write in pulpcore's FilesystemExport feature allows an authenticated administrator to escape the intended

CVE-2026-12405 HIGH
8.8 Oct 01

Command injection in the Red Hat Satellite job invocation API (/api/v2/job_invocations), shipped via the rubygem-foreman

CVE-2026-89091 HIGH
8.8 Oct 08

Symlink-following file overwrite on the Ansible control node is possible in ansible-core when a user runs `ansible-galax

CVE-2026-1961 HIGH
8.8 Mar 26

Command injection in Foreman's WebSocket proxy, as shipped in Red Hat Satellite 6, allows a malicious compute-resource p

CVE-2026-12541 HIGH
8.2 Oct 01

OS command injection in Foreman's foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks lets an attacker who already holds permi

CVE-2026-12540 HIGH
8.2 Oct 01

Command injection in the Foreman foreman-rake errors:fetch_log task shipped with Red Hat Satellite 6 allows a local user

CVE-2026-90959 HIGH
8.1 Sep 24

Path traversal in the pulpcore content upload API allows an authenticated user holding only low-privilege file-repositor

CVE-2026-106471 HIGH
8.1 Oct 07

Candlepin, the entitlement and subscription management engine behind Red Hat Satellite 6, contains an authorization-logi

CVE-2026-84218 HIGH
8.1 Sep 01

Jolokia's JSR-160 proxy in multiple Red Hat middleware products allows network-accessible unauthenticated attackers (per

CVE-2026-12542 HIGH
7.8 Oct 01

OS command injection in the Foreman foreman-tail helper utility shipped with Red Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9 allows a

CVE-2026-16493 HIGH
7.8 Jul 21

Arbitrary command execution in ansible-core allows an attacker who controls a collection source URI to run commands on a

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy