Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconDiscover target running Webmention plugin
-
DeliveryHost page with malicious MF2 avatar/url markup
-
ExploitSend unauthenticated webmention to target post
-
InstallPayload stored as pending comment metadata
-
C2Admin opens comment edit screen
-
ExecuteScript executes in privileged session
-
ImpactHijack admin actions
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the target site to have the Webmention plugin (≤5.8.0) installed with inbound webmention receiving enabled, since the injection vector is the unauthenticated webmention REST endpoint processing MF2 'avatar' and 'url' author properties from an attacker-controlled source page. The decisive limiting factor is the trigger: the stored payload only executes when a privileged user (moderator or administrator) opens the affected comment's edit screen in wp-admin - it does not fire on the public site or merely on storage, so a moderator who never opens the malicious comment is not impacted. No authentication is needed to plant the payload (PR:N), but the human moderation step is a real constraint that lowers practical likelihood relative to fully automatable XSS. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, base 7.2) reflects network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, and a scope change into the admin browser context. However, UI:N is debatable: execution requires a privileged user to open the affected comment's edit screen, which is passive user interaction - a realistic but non-default-guaranteed trigger that meaningfully limits exploitation, so the practical risk is somewhat lower than the 7.2 implies. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was supplied, meaning there is no evidence of active exploitation or automatable mass exploitation; treat this as a credible but not emergency-tier issue. The most important conflicting signal to flag: the stored-XSS-on-admin-view design pattern is reliably reachable by unauthenticated actors, but actual impact (C:L/I:L) is confined to what the admin's session can do until chained - verify the UI requirement against the vendor advisory before deprioritizing. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts a web page containing MF2 author markup whose 'avatar' or 'url' property carries an attribute-breakout XSS payload, then sends an unauthenticated webmention to a target WordPress post linking to that page. The plugin parses and stores the malicious metadata as a pending comment; when a moderator or administrator later opens that comment's edit screen, the script executes in their authenticated session, enabling actions such as creating a rogue admin or altering content. No POC is referenced, but the network attack vector and low complexity make reliable exploitation straightforward. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 30, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in the Webmention WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 5.8.0) lets unauthenticated attackers persist malicious script through the public webmention REST endpoint, which a moderator or administrator then triggers simply by opening the affected comment's edit screen. Attacker-controlled MF2 'avatar' and 'url' author properties are stored and later echoed unescaped into HTML 'value' attributes, yielding script execution in a privileged admin session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS or CISA KEV signal is present in the provided data.
RemediationAI
Upgrade the Webmention plugin to the latest version that includes the fix from WordPress plugin changeset 3583033 (https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3583033/webmention), which adds proper output escaping; the changeset confirms an upstream fix is available, but a specific released patched version number is not stated in the provided data, so confirm the fixed version on the plugin page before deploying. As interim compensating controls if you cannot update immediately: disable inbound Webmention receiving (deactivate the plugin or block/deny POST requests to the webmention REST endpoint at the web server or WAF), which stops new malicious author metadata from being stored but also disables the plugin's core inbound functionality; and review/purge existing pending webmention-derived comments before opening them in the editor, since the payload fires on the edit screen. Train moderators to avoid opening suspicious pending webmention comments until patched. Reference the Wordfence advisory above for detection guidance.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Webmention is a WordPress plugin (vendor 'pfefferle', cpe:2.3:a:pfefferle:webmention) implementing the W3C Webmention protocol, where one site notifies another that it has linked to it; the receiving site parses the source page for Microformats2 (MF2) author metadata such as name, avatar, and url. The root cause is CWE-79 (improper neutralization of input during web page generation): the MF2 handler (includes/handler/class-mf2.php) extracts author 'avatar' and 'url' values from the remote, attacker-controlled source page and stores them as comment metadata, and the edit-comment-form.php template renders those values directly into HTML 'value' attributes without esc_attr() or esc_url(). Because the parsing is reachable through the unauthenticated webmention REST endpoint, an attacker fully controls the stored payload, and the lack of context-appropriate output escaping allows attribute-breakout XSS when the data is reflected into the moderation UI.
Know when Webmention gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Unauthenticated injection via the network endpoint (PR:N, AV:N, AC:L), but execution needs a moderator to open the edit screen (UI:R), with scope change into the admin browser context (S:C) and limited C/I impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).
CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence
DescriptionCVE.org
The Webmention plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to and including 5.8.0 via parser-derived 'avatar' and 'url' author metadata. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied MF2 author properties processed by the unauthenticated webmention REST endpoint and rendered directly into HTML 'value' attributes by the edit-comment-form template without esc_attr() or esc_url(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a privileged user (moderator or administrator) opens the affected comment edit screen.
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
The Webmention WordPress plugin (versions 5.8.0 and earlier) contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious code that executes when administrators or moderators view affected comments. Compromise of admin accounts would grant attackers full control over site content and configuration, posing direct risk to organizational data integrity and site availability.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Disable the Webmention plugin; (2) Implement WAF/ModSecurity rules blocking script payloads on /wp-json/webmention endpoints; (3) Restrict /wp-json/webmention API access to trusted IP ranges; (4) Audit and sanitize wp_comments table for malicious JavaScript entries; (5) Deploy Content-Security-Policy headers restricting inline script execution.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Webmention
View allServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in WordPress Webmention plugin versions ≤5.6.2 allows unauthenticated remote attacker
Server-Side Request Forgery in Webmention plugin for WordPress (versions up to 5.6.2) allows authenticated attackers wit
Stored cross-site scripting in the Webmention plugin for WordPress (versions up to and including 5.10.1) lets an unauthe
EUVD-2026-40376
GHSA-q4c4-6mqr-j8hq
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB