Skip to main content

Webmention (WordPress) EUVDEUVD-2026-40376

| CVE-2026-10513 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-06-30 Wordfence GHSA-q4c4-6mqr-j8hq
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Discover target running Webmention plugin
  2. Delivery
    Host page with malicious MF2 avatar/url markup
  3. Exploit
    Send unauthenticated webmention to target post
  4. Install
    Payload stored as pending comment metadata
  5. C2
    Admin opens comment edit screen
  6. Execute
    Script executes in privileged session
  7. Impact
    Hijack admin actions

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target site to have the Webmention plugin (≤5.8.0) installed with inbound webmention receiving enabled, since the injection vector is the unauthenticated webmention REST endpoint processing MF2 'avatar' and 'url' author properties from an attacker-controlled source page. The decisive limiting factor is the trigger: the stored payload only executes when a privileged user (moderator or administrator) opens the affected comment's edit screen in wp-admin - it does not fire on the public site or merely on storage, so a moderator who never opens the malicious comment is not impacted. No authentication is needed to plant the payload (PR:N), but the human moderation step is a real constraint that lowers practical likelihood relative to fully automatable XSS.

Impact

The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, base 7.2) reflects network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, and a scope change into the admin browser context. However, UI:N is debatable: execution requires a privileged user to open the affected comment's edit screen, which is passive user interaction - a realistic but non-default-guaranteed trigger that meaningfully limits exploitation, so the practical risk is somewhat lower than the 7.2 implies. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was supplied, meaning there is no evidence of active exploitation or automatable mass exploitation; treat this as a credible but not emergency-tier issue. The most important conflicting signal to flag: the stored-XSS-on-admin-view design pattern is reliably reachable by unauthenticated actors, but actual impact (C:L/I:L) is confined to what the admin's session can do until chained - verify the UI requirement against the vendor advisory before deprioritizing.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker hosts a web page containing MF2 author markup whose 'avatar' or 'url' property carries an attribute-breakout XSS payload, then sends an unauthenticated webmention to a target WordPress post linking to that page. The plugin parses and stores the malicious metadata as a pending comment; when a moderator or administrator later opens that comment's edit screen, the script executes in their authenticated session, enabling actions such as creating a rogue admin or altering content. No POC is referenced, but the network attack vector and low complexity make reliable exploitation straightforward.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 30, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the Webmention WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 5.8.0) lets unauthenticated attackers persist malicious script through the public webmention REST endpoint, which a moderator or administrator then triggers simply by opening the affected comment's edit screen. Attacker-controlled MF2 'avatar' and 'url' author properties are stored and later echoed unescaped into HTML 'value' attributes, yielding script execution in a privileged admin session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS or CISA KEV signal is present in the provided data.

RemediationAI

Upgrade the Webmention plugin to the latest version that includes the fix from WordPress plugin changeset 3583033 (https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3583033/webmention), which adds proper output escaping; the changeset confirms an upstream fix is available, but a specific released patched version number is not stated in the provided data, so confirm the fixed version on the plugin page before deploying. As interim compensating controls if you cannot update immediately: disable inbound Webmention receiving (deactivate the plugin or block/deny POST requests to the webmention REST endpoint at the web server or WAF), which stops new malicious author metadata from being stored but also disables the plugin's core inbound functionality; and review/purge existing pending webmention-derived comments before opening them in the editor, since the payload fires on the edit screen. Train moderators to avoid opening suspicious pending webmention comments until patched. Reference the Wordfence advisory above for detection guidance.

Affected VersionsENISA

Webmention 0 ≤5.8.0

Affected Packages

euvd webmention no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Webmention is a WordPress plugin (vendor 'pfefferle', cpe:2.3:a:pfefferle:webmention) implementing the W3C Webmention protocol, where one site notifies another that it has linked to it; the receiving site parses the source page for Microformats2 (MF2) author metadata such as name, avatar, and url. The root cause is CWE-79 (improper neutralization of input during web page generation): the MF2 handler (includes/handler/class-mf2.php) extracts author 'avatar' and 'url' values from the remote, attacker-controlled source page and stores them as comment metadata, and the edit-comment-form.php template renders those values directly into HTML 'value' attributes without esc_attr() or esc_url(). Because the parsing is reachable through the unauthenticated webmention REST endpoint, an attacker fully controls the stored payload, and the lack of context-appropriate output escaping allows attribute-breakout XSS when the data is reflected into the moderation UI.

Know when Webmention gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.1 MEDIUM

Unauthenticated injection via the network endpoint (PR:N, AV:N, AC:L), but execution needs a moderator to open the edit screen (UI:R), with scope change into the admin browser context (S:C) and limited C/I impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The Webmention plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to and including 5.8.0 via parser-derived 'avatar' and 'url' author metadata. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied MF2 author properties processed by the unauthenticated webmention REST endpoint and rendered directly into HTML 'value' attributes by the edit-comment-form template without esc_attr() or esc_url(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a privileged user (moderator or administrator) opens the affected comment edit screen.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Webmention WordPress plugin (versions 5.8.0 and earlier) contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious code that executes when administrators or moderators view affected comments. Compromise of admin accounts would grant attackers full control over site content and configuration, posing direct risk to organizational data integrity and site availability.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Disable the Webmention plugin; (2) Implement WAF/ModSecurity rules blocking script payloads on /wp-json/webmention endpoints; (3) Restrict /wp-json/webmention API access to trusted IP ranges; (4) Audit and sanitize wp_comments table for malicious JavaScript entries; (5) Deploy Content-Security-Policy headers restricting inline script execution.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche IndieWeb WordPress plugin with modest install base
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy