Skip to main content

Webmention CVE-2026-0688

| EUVDEUVD-2026-18134 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-04-02 Wordfence GHSA-wjf6-53j2-2f8c
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Impact

The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C) indicates network-accessible attack with low complexity and low privilege barrier (Subscriber role is the lowest standard WordPress user tier), creating meaningful real-world risk despite the moderate 6.4 score. The Low impact on Confidentiality and Integrity (C:L/I:L) with no Availability impact limits damage scope, but the Changed Scope (S:C) signals potential lateral movement to internal systems. The privilege requirement of PR:L is critical-this is not an unauthenticated flaw but requires account creation, which many open WordPress installations allow by default. EPSS exploitation probability is moderate, suggesting this is a legitimate concern for security teams but not a critical emergency; however, sites allowing open user registration are at higher risk. The lack of KEV (CISA KEV) confirmation and unknown POC status at time of analysis suggest no active widespread exploitation campaigns, though the straightforward nature of SSRF attacks means proof-of-concept development would be straightforward for determined threat actors.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a Subscriber-level WordPress account (obtainable through user registration on open sites or from compromised credentials) crafts a Webmention request containing a malicious URL pointing to an internal service, such as http://127.0.0.1:8080/admin or a private IP range service. The Tools::read function processes this request without validating the destination, causing the WordPress server to make an HTTP request to the internal target. The attacker receives the response, allowing them to enumerate internal services, extract data from metadata endpoints (e.g., AWS instance metadata), or interact with unprotected internal applications. No user interaction is required due to the UI:N vector.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Apr 02, 2026

Server-Side Request Forgery in Webmention plugin for WordPress (versions up to 5.6.2) allows authenticated attackers with Subscriber-level access to make arbitrary web requests from the affected server via the Tools::read function, enabling reconnaissance and potential modification of internal services. EPSS score of 6.4 reflects moderate real-world exploitability risk given the low privilege requirement and network-accessible attack vector, though exploitation requires valid WordPress authentication.

RemediationAI

Update the Webmention plugin to version 5.6.3 or later, which patches the SSRF vulnerability in the Tools::read function (see changeset 3494831 at https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3494831/webmention). The patched version implements proper URL validation and request filtering to prevent access to internal or unintended endpoints. Additionally, site administrators should review WordPress user roles and permissions to restrict Subscriber-level access if not needed, and consider network-level controls (firewall rules, WAF) to limit outbound HTTP requests from the web application server. Monitoring for unusual outbound connections from the WordPress application can help detect exploitation attempts.

Affected VersionsENISA

Webmention 0 ≤5.6.2

Affected Packages

euvd webmention no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability exists in the Tools::read function within the Webmention plugin's class-tools.php file, a component responsible for processing web mentions (a web standard for notifying websites about links). The SSRF flaw (CWE-918) stems from insufficient validation of URLs passed to internal HTTP request functions, allowing attackers to construct requests to arbitrary internal or external endpoints. The plugin, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:pfefferle:webmention:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, is widely distributed through the official WordPress plugin repository and used by sites implementing the Webmention protocol for decentralized commenting and interactions.

Know when Webmention gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The Webmention plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.2 via the 'Tools::read' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 93% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

Related Vulnerabilities in Webmention Plugin Server-Side Request Forgery

View all 2

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy