Skip to main content

Fortra BoKS EUVDEUVD-2026-36730

| CVE-2026-9862 CRITICAL
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-06-15 Fortra GHSA-32v6-8gq7-4gxm
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Fortra
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify exposed boks_autoregisterd service
  2. Delivery
    Craft registration request with shell metacharacters
  3. Exploit
    Send to autoregistration endpoint
  4. Execution
    Trigger command injection in handler
  5. Persist
    Execute commands as service account
  6. Impact
    Pivot to BoKS-managed hosts

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to the boks_autoregisterd daemon on a BoKS master/replica during the autoregistration processing path - the attacker must be able to deliver a registration request the daemon will parse. No authentication, user interaction, or local access is required per CVSS PR:N/UI:N. Limiting factors: the daemon is typically only reachable on management/registration networks rather than the public internet, so internet-exposed BoKS installations are the primary realistic attack surface; deployments that have disabled autoregistration or firewalled the service to a known allowlist of enrolling hosts substantially reduce exposure. The exact wire format and which registration field carries the injection are not disclosed in the public description, so defenders cannot yet construct precise IDS signatures from CVE data alone.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H signals a worst-case profile: network reachable, low complexity, no authentication, no user interaction, with full CIA impact - consistent with a remote pre-auth RCE. EPSS and SSVC data were not provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV at time of analysis, so no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Despite the absence of exploitation telemetry, the target population (PAM infrastructure) is an unusually high-value asset: compromise yields lateral pivot into every system BoKS brokers access to, so defenders should treat this as a top-priority patch even without KEV/POC pressure. One limiting factor: exploitation requires network reachability to the boks_autoregisterd port, which in well-segmented deployments may be restricted to management networks - verify exposure before assuming internet-wide risk.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network reachability to a BoKS master initiates a crafted autoregistration request to boks_autoregisterd containing shell metacharacters in a field that flows into an OS command (for example, hostname or identity payload), causing the daemon to execute attacker-chosen commands as the service account. The attacker then leverages the service's privileges on the BoKS master to read credential material, alter access policies, or plant a persistent backdoor across every system BoKS manages. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS AC:L/PR:N/UI:N profile means weaponization once details surface would be straightforward.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 15, 2026

Remote unauthenticated command injection in Fortra's Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands with the privileges of the boks_autoregisterd service. The flaw resides in autoregistration processing and carries a critical CVSS 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) rating, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Because BoKS is a privileged access management product, successful exploitation can directly undermine the security control plane intended to protect enterprise privileged accounts.

RemediationAI

Patch availability and exact fixed version must be confirmed against Fortra advisory FI-2026-007 at https://www.fortra.com/security/advisories/product-security/fi-2026-007 - apply the vendor-supplied update to all BoKS master and replica servers as the primary remediation. Until the patched build is deployed, compensating controls include restricting network access to the boks_autoregisterd service via host firewall or network ACLs so only known management subnets and registering hosts can reach it (trade-off: blocks legitimate autoregistration from new networks and may require manual host enrollment), and where operationally feasible, temporarily disabling the autoregistration daemon and enrolling new hosts via the manual registration workflow (trade-off: significant operational overhead in dynamic environments). Monitor boks_autoregisterd logs for malformed registration requests and unexpected child processes spawned by the service account as a detection layer.

Affected VersionsENISA

Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) boks-server 9.0.0.0 ≤boks-server 9.0.0.4
Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) boks-server 8.1.0.0 ≤boks-server 8.1.0.22

Affected Packages

euvd core_privileged_access_manager_boks_boks_server_8_1_0_0_boks_server no fix
euvd core_privileged_access_manager_boks_boks_server_9_0_0_0_boks_server no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

BoKS is Fortra's centralized privileged access management platform for managing administrative access across heterogeneous Unix, Linux, and Windows estates. The vulnerable component, boks_autoregisterd, is the daemon responsible for handling automatic registration of new hosts/agents into the BoKS domain, a network-facing service by design. The root cause class is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), meaning attacker-controlled input received during the autoregistration handshake is passed to a shell or system call without adequate sanitization, allowing shell metacharacters to break out of the intended command context. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:fortra:core_privileged_access_manager_(boks):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates affected versions are not version-bounded in NVD data, implying broad applicability across BoKS releases pending vendor advisory clarification.

Know when Core Privileged Access Manager Boks gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Fortra) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Description states remote network attacker against a listening autoregistration service with no authentication, and command execution as the service account yields full CIA impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Fortra).

CVSS VectorVendor: Fortra

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Fortra's Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the boks_autoregisterd service. A remote attacker with network access to the service may be able to cause commands to be executed with the privileges of the service during the autoregistration processing.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Fortra's Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) contains a critical remote unauthenticated command injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-9862, CVSS 9.8) that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands as the BoKS system service. Since BoKS is the foundational control protecting all enterprise privileged credentials, successful exploitation grants attackers complete administrative access to the organization's critical systems. Organizations using BoKS face immediate risk of undetected administrative credential compromise and lateral movement throughout the infrastructure.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Strict network segmentation-restrict BoKS management access to dedicated administrative VLANs and deny untrusted inbound access at firewall; (2) Enable debug-level logging on BoKS autoregistration service and forward logs to SIEM for real-time alerting on unusual process spawning or command execution; (3) Implement mandatory out-of-band session recording for all privileged activities; (4) Deploy intrusion detection signatures monitoring for BoKS-targeted exploit patterns; (5) Institute manual privileged credential rotation process outside BoKS until patched. These controls reduce exposure but do not eliminate risk-vendor patch is mandatory for full remediation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 47% exploitable
Social Media
5
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy