Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify exposed CyberArk Vault listener
-
DeliverySend crafted unexpected input to Vault protocol
-
ExploitTrigger unhandled validation path
-
ExecutionVault service process terminates
-
ImpactPrivileged access workflows halt enterprise-wide
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network reachability to the CyberArk Vault listener (typically TCP/1858) and that the Vault is running an affected build (<15.0.3, <14.6.5, <14.2.7, or <14.0.8) in one of the unspecified 'specific circumstances and configuration scenarios' called out by CyberArk - the advisory does not name the exact feature/setting, so defenders should request the trigger details from CyberArk support. No authentication is required per the CVSS 4.0 vector (PR:N, UI:N), and no user interaction is needed. Limiting factors: the bug is a denial-of-service only (no credential disclosure or integrity loss), the configuration precondition means default/hardened deployments may not be exploitable, and properly segmented Vault networks (the CyberArk-recommended posture) further reduce reachability. |
| Impact | Signals diverge sharply and should be weighed carefully. CVSS 4.0 vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N indicates a trivially reachable, unauthenticated network attack with no user interaction, and VA:H/SA:L pushes the score to 8.7 (High); the U:Amber tag suggests vendor-coordinated handling. However, the only impact is availability of the vulnerable system (VC:N/VI:N) with a 'localized' DoS - no confidentiality or integrity loss, and the description explicitly conditions exploitation on 'specific circumstances and configuration scenarios,' which is not reflected in the AC:L/AT:N metrics and likely overstates real-world ease. EPSS data was not provided, the CVE is not on CISA KEV, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net read: this is a meaningful operational risk because the Vault is a single-point-of-failure for privileged access workflows and an outage cascades to every dependent system, but it is not a confidentiality/integrity emergency and the 'specific configuration' caveat means the realistic exploitable population is smaller than the score implies - verify applicability with CyberArk before treating as P0. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote attacker with network reach to the Vault listener crafts an unexpected input payload to the Vault protocol endpoint, which the affected version fails to validate, causing the Vault service process to terminate. Because the Vault brokers credentials for every PAM-managed account, the resulting outage immediately halts privileged session launches, password rotations, and CPM/PSM operations across the enterprise until the service is restarted. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, so weaponization would require reverse-engineering the CyberArk Vault protocol and the specific configuration trigger. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 12, 2026
Denial of service in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager (PAM) Self-Hosted Vault allows remote attackers to terminate the Vault service by sending unexpected input under specific configuration scenarios, affecting versions prior to 15.0.3, 14.6.5, 14.2.7, and 14.0.8. Disclosed by Palo Alto Networks (which now owns CyberArk) via Security Bulletin CA26-17 with no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 reflects the network-reachable, unauthenticated attack path against a security-critical service. The flaw is a CWE-400 resource/input handling issue that produces a localized DoS rather than code execution or data exposure.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to CyberArk PAM Self-Hosted Vault 15.0.3, 14.6.5, 14.2.7, or 14.0.8 depending on your maintenance branch, per the release notes linked from Security Bulletin CA26-17 (docs.cyberark.com/pam-self-hosted/.../rn-whatsnew15-0-vault.htm#15.0.3 and the corresponding 14.6.5, 14.2.7, 14.0.8 pages). Until patching, restrict network reachability to the Vault by tightening firewall rules so only authorized CPM/PVWA/PSM/AAM components can reach the Vault listener (default TCP/1858) - note this is already a CyberArk-recommended hardening and should not break a correctly segmented deployment, though shared/flat networks will need ACL work. Confirm with CyberArk support which 'specific circumstances and configuration scenarios' trigger the bug so you can disable or reconfigure the offending feature as an interim control, and ensure Vault high-availability/DR replication is healthy so a forced restart of the primary does not extend the outage window.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the Vault tier of CyberArk PAM Self-Hosted, the central credential store underpinning privileged session management, secrets brokering, and just-in-time access for enterprise privileged accounts (CPE cpe:2.3:a:cyberark_software,_a_palo_alto_networks_company:pam_sh_vault). The Vault listens on proprietary protocols and exposes input parsing surfaces that, per the description, mishandle unexpected input. The root cause class is CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption); in practice this manifests as a validation gap where malformed or unexpected input is propagated into a code path that crashes or terminates the Vault process rather than being rejected at the boundary. The 'Hashicorp' tag in the intelligence feed hints that the issue may live in a Hashicorp-derived dependency (e.g., a vendored Go library or Vault-adjacent component) embedded into the CyberArk product, though this is not confirmed in the advisory text.
Know when Pam Sh Vault gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/U:Amber
Network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N), but description requires 'specific circumstances and configuration scenarios' so AC:H; availability-only impact (A:H, C/I:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (palo_alto).
CVSS VectorVendor: palo_alto
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Idira Privileged Access Manager (PAM) Self-Hosted Vault versions prior to 15.0.3, 14.6.5, 14.2.7, and 14.0.8 exhibit a validation vulnerability. Under specific circumstances and configuration scenarios, processing unexpected input could potentially lead to an unexpected service termination, resulting in a localized denial of service (DoS). CyberArk Security Bulletin: CA26-17
Executive ViewAI
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Vault is vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote denial-of-service attack (no public exploit identified at time of analysis) affecting versions prior to 15.0.3, 14.6.5, 14.2.7, and 14.0.8. The attack is network-reachable and requires no authentication, creating operational risk to privileged access management functions organization-wide. No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim compensating controls are required.
Implement network segmentation to restrict Vault access to authorized administrative networks only. Deploy IPS/WAF rules to filter unexpected or malformed input to the Vault service, referencing CyberArk Security Bulletin CA26-17 for specific indicators. Restrict API access through firewall rules and implement rate-limiting where available. Monitor Vault service logs for anomalous connection attempts. Maintain these controls until vendor-released patches (15.0.3, 14.6.5, 14.2.7, 14.0.8) are deployed.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
EUVD-2026-36385
GHSA-3xcp-963x-rf7x
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB