Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber
Network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N), but description requires 'specific circumstances and configuration scenarios' so AC:H; availability-only impact (A:H, C/I:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (palo_alto).
CVSS VectorVendor: palo_alto
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Idira Privileged Access Manager (PAM) Self-Hosted Vault versions prior to 15.0.3, 14.6.5, 14.2.7, and 14.0.8 exhibit a validation vulnerability. Under specific circumstances and configuration scenarios, processing unexpected input could potentially lead to an unexpected service termination, resulting in a localized denial of service (DoS). CyberArk Security Bulletin: CA26-17
AnalysisAI
Denial of service in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager (PAM) Self-Hosted Vault allows remote attackers to terminate the Vault service by sending unexpected input under specific configuration scenarios, affecting versions prior to 15.0.3, 14.6.5, 14.2.7, and 14.0.8. Disclosed by Palo Alto Networks (which now owns CyberArk) via Security Bulletin CA26-17 with no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 reflects the network-reachable, unauthenticated attack path against a security-critical service. The flaw is a CWE-400 resource/input handling issue that produces a localized DoS rather than code execution or data exposure.
Technical ContextAI
The affected component is the Vault tier of CyberArk PAM Self-Hosted, the central credential store underpinning privileged session management, secrets brokering, and just-in-time access for enterprise privileged accounts (CPE cpe:2.3:a:cyberark_software,_a_palo_alto_networks_company:pam_sh_vault). The Vault listens on proprietary protocols and exposes input parsing surfaces that, per the description, mishandle unexpected input. The root cause class is CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption); in practice this manifests as a validation gap where malformed or unexpected input is propagated into a code path that crashes or terminates the Vault process rather than being rejected at the boundary. The 'Hashicorp' tag in the intelligence feed hints that the issue may live in a Hashicorp-derived dependency (e.g., a vendored Go library or Vault-adjacent component) embedded into the CyberArk product, though this is not confirmed in the advisory text.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to CyberArk PAM Self-Hosted Vault 15.0.3, 14.6.5, 14.2.7, or 14.0.8 depending on your maintenance branch, per the release notes linked from Security Bulletin CA26-17 (docs.cyberark.com/pam-self-hosted/.../rn-whatsnew15-0-vault.htm#15.0.3 and the corresponding 14.6.5, 14.2.7, 14.0.8 pages). Until patching, restrict network reachability to the Vault by tightening firewall rules so only authorized CPM/PVWA/PSM/AAM components can reach the Vault listener (default TCP/1858) - note this is already a CyberArk-recommended hardening and should not break a correctly segmented deployment, though shared/flat networks will need ACL work. Confirm with CyberArk support which 'specific circumstances and configuration scenarios' trigger the bug so you can disable or reconfigure the offending feature as an interim control, and ensure Vault high-availability/DR replication is healthy so a forced restart of the primary does not extend the outage window.
Same weakness CWE-400 – Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
View allSame technique Denial Of Service
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-36385
GHSA-3xcp-963x-rf7x