Skip to main content

macOS EUVDEUVD-2026-29240

| CVE-2026-28919 HIGH
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2026-05-11 apple GHSA-8g97-7mpw-mjmw
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: apple
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Social engineer user to download malicious app
  2. Delivery
    User launches trojanized application
  3. Exploit
    Exploit state handling race condition
  4. Execution
    Manipulate privilege management structures
  5. Persist
    Escalate to root privileges
  6. Impact
    Install persistent backdoor

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires user interaction to launch a malicious application - the attacker must convince the user to execute the exploit code, typically through social engineering, trojanized software downloads, or compromised application packages. The CVSS vector PR:N indicates no existing privileges are required for the application itself, meaning any unprivileged application run by a standard user can attempt exploitation. No special system configuration, disabled security features, or administrator privileges are required. Exploitation is limited to local access (AV:L), meaning the attacker needs code execution on the target macOS system first, either through the malicious application or prior compromise. The UI:R requirement is the primary limiting factor distinguishing this from wormable or remotely exploitable vulnerabilities.

Impact

CVSS 7.8 (High) reflects significant technical impact (full confidentiality, integrity, availability compromise) but requires local access (AV:L) and user interaction (UI:R). Attack complexity is low (AC:L) and requires no privileges (PR:N), meaning any application a user runs could theoretically exploit this. However, real-world risk assessment reveals conflicting signals: EPSS score of 0.02% (4th percentile) indicates security researchers assess exploitation probability as very low, and no CISA KEV listing confirms no active exploitation detected. The UI:R requirement means an attacker needs to trick a user into running a malicious application, not simply achieve remote code execution. From SSVC perspective: exploitation status is none, technical impact is total (root access), but automatability is limited by the UI requirement. This is a genuine privilege escalation worthy of patching, particularly in enterprise environments with untrusted applications, but not an imminent mass-exploitation threat. The low EPSS despite high CVSS suggests sophisticated exploitation requirements not evident from the description alone, or insufficient attacker interest in macOS-specific local exploits.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker distributes a malicious macOS application disguised as legitimate software (e.g., through social engineering, trojanized downloads, or supply chain compromise). When a user launches the application, it exploits the state handling flaw to manipulate privilege management data structures during a system call or authorization check. The application successfully escalates from user-level privileges to root, gaining complete system control to install persistent malware, exfiltrate sensitive data, or disable security controls.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 12, 2026

Local privilege escalation in macOS Sequoia, Sonoma, and Tahoe allows applications to gain root privileges through a state handling flaw in the operating system. Apple patched this consistency issue in macOS Sequoia 15.7.7, Sonoma 14.8.7, and Tahoe 26.5. Despite the high CVSS score (7.8), EPSS indicates only 0.02% exploitation probability (4th percentile), no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and no CISA KEV listing, suggesting this is not yet widely exploited but represents a significant risk in multi-user or untrusted application environments.

RemediationAI

Update to vendor-released patches: macOS Sequoia 15.7.7, macOS Sonoma 14.8.7, or macOS Tahoe 26.5 via System Settings > General > Software Update. Apple security bulletins are available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/127115 (Tahoe), https://support.apple.com/en-us/127116 (Sequoia), and https://support.apple.com/en-us/127117 (Sonoma). If immediate patching is not feasible, implement application allowlisting to restrict execution to only trusted, signed applications from identified developers, enforced through MDM policies or Gatekeeper configurations. This compensating control reduces attack surface by preventing unknown applications from running, though it may impact user productivity in development or testing environments. Additionally, enable Full Disk Access restrictions and review System Integrity Protection (SIP) status to ensure layered protections remain active, though these do not directly mitigate the vulnerability.

Affected VersionsENISA

macOS 0 <14.8.7
macOS 0 <26.5
macOS 0 <15.7.7

Affected Packages

euvd macos fix: 14.8.7, 15.7.7, 26.5

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This vulnerability stems from CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), where the macOS kernel or system framework fails to properly maintain state consistency during privilege transitions. State handling flaws often occur in race conditions, time-of-check-time-of-use (TOCTOU) scenarios, or improper validation of credential objects during process elevation. The CPE identifier confirms this affects Apple's macOS operating system across three major release branches: Sonoma (14.x), Sequoia (15.x), and the newly released Tahoe (26.x). The consistency issue likely involves improper synchronization of privilege-related data structures, allowing a malicious application to manipulate system state to bypass authorization checks and escalate from user-level to root privileges.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (apple) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from Vendor (apple) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: apple

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
May 12, 2026 - 14:22 NVD
7.8 (HIGH)
Patch available
May 11, 2026 - 22:03 EUVD
CVE Published
May 11, 2026 - 20:07 nvd
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
May 11, 2026 - 20:07 nvd
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

A consistency issue was addressed with improved state handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.7, macOS Sonoma 14.8.7, macOS Tahoe 26.5. An app may be able to gain root privileges.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2026-28919 is a local privilege escalation vulnerability affecting macOS Sequoia, Sonoma, and Tahoe that allows installed applications to gain root-level access through an operating system state handling flaw. Organizations with macOS deployments face risk if users run untrusted applications or operate in multi-user environments, as any application could potentially escalate to administrative privileges and compromise system integrity and data confidentiality.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Vendor-released patch: macOS Sequoia 15.7.7, Sonoma 14.8.7, Tahoe 26.5. If immediate patching is delayed, restrict installation of untrusted applications through Mobile Device Management (MDM) policies, disable user sudo access where feasible, enforce application allowlisting, and increase monitoring for unexpected privilege escalation attempts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 96% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy