Skip to main content

Ona WordPress Theme EUVDEUVD-2026-26747

| CVE-2026-6812 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-05-02 Wordfence
4.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Compromise WordPress admin credentials
  2. Delivery
    Log in to WordPress admin panel
  3. Exploit
    Navigate to Ona theme settings
  4. Execution
    Inject malicious URL parameter into ona_activate_child_theme
  5. Persist
    Theme issues SSRF request to internal service
  6. Impact
    Attacker receives response or triggers internal action

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to possess WordPress administrator-level privileges or above. The attacker must have access to the WordPress admin panel and the ability to trigger or interact with the ona_activate_child_theme function via the administrative interface or direct HTTP request. The vulnerability is not exploitable by unauthenticated users or lower-privileged authenticated users (subscribers, contributors, editors). The high attack complexity (AC:H) from the CVSS vector suggests the exploitation path is not trivial and may require specific knowledge of the theme's internal parameters, URL construction, or admin interface workflow. No special server configuration is required; the vulnerability exists in default Ona theme installations. The impact is limited to outbound requests originating from the server; the attacker cannot directly exfiltrate data from internal services in all cases (e.g., if responses are not returned to the attacker), but can perform reconnaissance, port scanning, and targeted requests to internal services.

Impact

CVSS score of 4.4 with network attack vector but high complexity (AC:H) and high privilege requirement (PR:H) indicates a low-to-moderate severity vulnerability. The CVSS scope change flag (S:C) confirms impact can extend to other systems via SSRF. However, real-world risk is substantially mitigated by the requirement for administrator-level privileges-exploitation requires either a compromised admin account, an insider threat, or a multi-stage attack where initial access is first gained. The lack of KEV listing, public exploit code, or vendor patch (as of analysis) suggests limited active exploitation in the wild. EPSS data is not provided; however, the combination of high privilege requirement and high complexity indicates this is primarily a lateral movement and internal reconnaissance tool for adversaries with administrative access, not a network-accessible attack vector. WordPress administrators should deprioritize this against network-accessible vulnerabilities (such as unauthenticated RCE), but should still patch to prevent lateral damage from compromised admin accounts.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A WordPress site administrator account is compromised via credential stuffing or phishing. The attacker logs in as admin and navigates to the theme settings page where ona_activate_child_theme is exposed. The attacker supplies a malicious URL parameter pointing to an internal service (e.g., http://localhost:6379 for Redis, or an internal configuration endpoint). The theme makes an unauthenticated request to that endpoint on behalf of the web server, allowing the attacker to enumerate, query, or modify internal services without direct network access. This is particularly effective in containerized or microservice environments where internal services are isolated from the internet but reachable from the web application layer.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 02, 2026

Server-Side Request Forgery in the Ona WordPress theme versions up to 1.26 via the ona_activate_child_theme function allows authenticated administrators to make arbitrary web requests originating from the affected server, enabling query and modification of internal services. The vulnerability requires administrator-level privileges and high attack complexity, limiting real-world exploitation to compromised or malicious admin accounts. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified.

RemediationAI

Update the Ona theme to a version later than 1.26 as soon as a patched version is released by deothemes. At the time of this analysis, no patched version has been independently confirmed; monitor the Wordfence vulnerability advisory at https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0acb365c-b5f2-4377-875b-69278a8ff96e?source=cve for patch availability. As an interim compensating control, strictly limit WordPress administrator role assignment to trusted users only and implement role-based access controls (RBAC) to ensure only essential staff retain admin privileges. Additionally, monitor and log all calls to the ona_activate_child_theme function and restrict outbound HTTP/HTTPS requests from the web application to a whitelist of necessary external endpoints using firewall rules or WAF policies. Disable the Ona theme's child theme activation feature if it is not actively used, via modifying theme-admin.php or disabling the associated admin menu options. These controls reduce the attack surface but do not eliminate the vulnerability; a proper patched release is required for full remediation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Ona 0 ≤1.26

Affected Packages

euvd ona no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability exists in the ona_activate_child_theme administrative function within the Ona theme's theme-admin.php file (lines 688-694). It is a CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw, meaning the application accepts user-controlled input to construct HTTP requests without proper validation or sanitization. An administrator can supply a malicious URL parameter that causes the theme to issue web requests to internal services, local network resources, or external targets. This is particularly dangerous in WordPress environments where internal services (databases, cache servers, configuration endpoints) may be accessible only from localhost or internal networks. The Ona theme is distributed via the WordPress.org plugin repository (cpe:2.3:a:deothemes:ona), suggesting it has significant adoption among WordPress sites.

Know when Ona gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 4.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The Ona theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.26 via the ona_activate_child_theme. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 99% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy