Skip to main content

IBM Langflow Desktop EUVDEUVD-2026-26419

| CVE-2026-3340 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-04-30 ibm
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Discover Langflow Desktop endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious URL with internal target
  3. Exploit
    Send SSRF payload to application
  4. Execution
    Application initiates unauthorized request
  5. Persist
    Attacker receives response or observes side effects
  6. Impact
    Enumerate internal network or trigger backend state change

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The vulnerability is exploitable against unauthenticated network access to the Langflow Desktop HTTP endpoint without any required user interaction or special configuration - the SSRF flaw exists in default installations (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). However, practical exploitation is constrained by: (1) the product being Desktop-grade software, not typically exposed to untrusted networks; (2) outbound network policies in enterprise environments that restrict traffic to whitelisted destinations; (3) internal firewalls blocking access to sensitive services (Kubernetes API, cloud metadata services, internal databases) that would be the primary targets of SSRF probing. Exploitation is most feasible in scenarios where Langflow Desktop is exposed via port forwarding, runs in permissive development environments, or is compromised via workstation compromise or insider threat.

Impact

CVSS 6.5 with network-accessible, unauthenticated exploitation (AV:N/PR:N) represents moderate-to-high real-world risk for organizations running Langflow Desktop as a service or in shared environments. However, critical limiting factors reduce immediate threat: (1) the product is explicitly 'Desktop' - typically runs on user workstations rather than cloud or production servers, constraining network access to internal corporate networks; (2) CVSS vector shows S:U (scope unchanged), meaning the attacker cannot escalate impact beyond the vulnerable component itself, ruling out lateral movement into other systems via the SSRF alone; (3) no EPSS score or KEV status provided - absence of active exploitation data suggests this is not yet widely weaponized despite public disclosure. The moderate C:L/I:L impact (not full confidentiality/integrity loss) reflects that SSRF enables read access to internal services and triggering of state-changing requests, but not direct data theft or code execution. Organizations using Langflow Desktop in air-gapped or restrictive egress-filtered networks face lower risk; those integrating it with APIs, internal dashboards, or metadata services (AWS IAM, Kubernetes API, internal Jenkins) face elevated risk. Real priority depends on deployment context and network exposure rather than raw CVSS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network access to a Langflow Desktop instance (e.g., exposed via port forwarding, internal network, or compromised user workstation) sends a crafted HTTP request containing a malicious URL parameter to the vulnerable SSRF endpoint. The application processes the URL without validation and initiates an HTTP request from the server, allowing the attacker to: (1) discover internal services by probing common private IP ranges and ports; (2) trigger state-changing requests to internal APIs (disable users, modify configurations, trigger deployments); (3) extract error messages or response content from internal services to identify running software versions or gain information for secondary attacks. No user interaction or authentication is required due to the AV:N/PR:N vector.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Apr 30, 2026

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 permits unauthenticated remote attackers to send arbitrary HTTP requests from the vulnerable system, enabling network enumeration, internal service probing, and facilitation of secondary attacks against backend infrastructure. CVSS 6.5 reflects moderate confidentiality and integrity impact without authentication barriers despite PR:N in vector.

RemediationAI

Upgrade IBM Langflow Desktop to version 1.8.5 or later, which includes the SSRF validation fixes per IBM security advisory (https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7271096). Users unable to upgrade immediately should implement network-level mitigations: restrict outbound HTTP/HTTPS traffic from Langflow Desktop to explicitly whitelisted internal services only (use firewall rules, network policy, or proxy authentication); block access to private IP ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, 169.254.0.0/16) and link-local addresses (127.0.0.0/8, ::1/128) at the egress firewall to prevent enumeration of internal infrastructure; disable or isolate Langflow Desktop instances from direct connectivity to sensitive internal services (Kubernetes API, cloud metadata endpoints, SSH, RDP, database ports). Note that network restrictions do not eliminate the vulnerability but reduce exploitability in shared or untrusted environments.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 ≤1.8.4

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_desktop no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM Langflow Desktop is a desktop application for building and executing AI workflows using language models. The vulnerability resides in server-side request handling (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery), where user-supplied input intended for local processing is instead passed directly to HTTP client libraries without proper validation or URL scheme/destination whitelisting. This allows attackers to craft malicious payloads that cause the application to initiate requests to arbitrary internal networks, private IP ranges, or restricted services that would be blocked if requested directly from the attacker's network. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N) indicates network-accessible SSRF with no authentication required and low attack complexity, suggesting the vulnerable endpoint is reachable via HTTP/HTTPS without prior compromise.

Know when Langflow Desktop gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch released
Apr 30, 2026 - 21:15 nvd
Patch available
CVE Published
Apr 30, 2026 - 21:04 nvd
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 IBM Langflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 93% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy