Skip to main content

Contest Gallery EUVDEUVD-2026-15576

| CVE-2026-24964 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-03-25 Patchstack GHSA-4f94-fq23-hch4
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Impact

Risk assessment is significantly hampered by the absence of a CVSS score, CVSS vector, and EPSS data. However, SSRF vulnerabilities are inherently high-risk due to their potential for broad impact: they can facilitate lateral movement within networks, expose sensitive metadata (e.g., AWS credentials), bypass firewalls, and enable attacks on internal services. The fact that this affects a WordPress plugin means exposure is widespread—any WordPress installation running Contest Gallery ≤28.1.2.1 is potentially vulnerable. Without confirmation of active exploitation (KEV status unknown) or public POC availability, the immediate exploitation risk cannot be quantified; however, SSRF flaws are well-understood and exploits are trivial to craft once the vulnerable endpoint is identified. The affected version range ('n/a through 28.1.2.1') suggests a long period of exposure. Given the ease of exploitation and broad plugin distribution, this should be treated as a priority vulnerability despite the absence of numerical risk scores.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker identifies a WordPress site running Contest Gallery ≤28.1.2.1 and discovers an endpoint that accepts user-supplied URLs (e.g., an image import or gallery configuration parameter). The attacker crafts a request containing an internal URL such as 'http://127.0.0.1:8080/admin' or 'http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/' (AWS metadata), causing the vulnerable plugin to fetch the resource server-side and return the response or side-effects to the attacker. This allows reconnaissance of internal services, credential theft from cloud metadata endpoints, or attacks against internal applications without direct network access. No POC availability is documented in current intelligence sources.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 25, 2026

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Contest Gallery, a WordPress plugin developed by Wasiliy Strecker, affecting versions up to and including 28.1.2.1. This vulnerability allows attackers to abuse the affected application to make unauthorized requests to internal or external systems, potentially leading to information disclosure, internal network reconnaissance, or attacks against backend services. The vulnerability was reported by Patchstack and tracked under EUVD-2026-15576; however, no CVSS score, EPSS data, or confirmed active exploitation status is currently available, limiting the ability to assess immediate severity.

RemediationAI

Immediately upgrade Contest Gallery to a patched version greater than 28.1.2.1 as provided by the developer. Consult the Patchstack database entry (https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/contest-gallery/) for availability of a patched release and installation instructions. Until a patch is available or can be applied, implement network-level controls to restrict the WordPress server's outbound HTTP/HTTPS requests to only necessary external services, disable any Contest Gallery features that process external URLs if possible, and implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block SSRF payloads (e.g., requests to 127.0.0.1, 169.254.169.254, or internal IP ranges). Monitor plugin activity and consider temporarily disabling Contest Gallery if it is not essential to operations.

Affected VersionsENISA

Contest Gallery n/a ≤≤ 28.1.2.1

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is classified as CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), a class of flaws where an application processes user-controlled input to construct HTTP requests without proper validation or sanitization. The affected product is Contest Gallery (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:wasiliy_strecker_/_contestgallery_developer:contest_gallery), a WordPress plugin. In SSRF vulnerabilities, an attacker can manipulate the application to make requests on behalf of the server—such as accessing localhost services, internal IP ranges, cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., AWS IMDSv1), or external third-party systems. The root cause in Contest Gallery likely involves insufficient input validation on parameters that control URL fetching, HTTP methods, or request targets, allowing an attacker to bypass intended access controls and interact with restricted resources.

Know when Contest Gallery gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Wasiliy Strecker / ContestGallery developer Contest Gallery contest-gallery allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Contest Gallery: from n/a through <= 28.1.2.1.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2026-24964 presents moderate security risk, a server-side request forgery vulnerability rated CVSS 6.4. Users could be tricked into performing unintended actions. Organizations should apply vendor updates when available and monitor for exploitation.

Business Impact: Low
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. If patching is delayed: implement egress filtering, block metadata endpoints.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 96% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2021-24915 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 29

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 13.1.0.6 does not have capability checks and does not sanitise or escape the

CVE-2024-43283 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Aug 26

Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in Wasiliy Strecker / ContestGallery developer Contest G

CVE-2026-16055 HIGH POC
7.5 Aug 05

Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before version 30.0.7 implements a custom front-end login mechanism that issues authent

CVE-2022-4158 HIGH POC
7.5 Dec 26

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1, Contest Gallery Pro WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1 do not escape

CVE-2022-4156 HIGH POC
7.5 Dec 26

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1, Contest Gallery Pro WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1 do not escape

CVE-2026-16057 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Aug 03

Post-deletion authorization bypass in the Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 30.0.7 allows any authenticated Author

CVE-2022-4166 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Dec 26

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1, Contest Gallery Pro WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1 do not escape

CVE-2022-4165 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Dec 26

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1, Contest Gallery Pro WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1 do not escape

CVE-2022-4164 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Dec 26

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1, Contest Gallery Pro WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1 do not escape

CVE-2022-4163 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Dec 26

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1, Contest Gallery Pro WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1 do not escape

CVE-2022-4162 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Dec 26

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1, Contest Gallery Pro WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1 do not escape

CVE-2022-4161 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Dec 26

The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1, Contest Gallery Pro WordPress plugin before 19.1.5.1 do not escape

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy