Skip to main content

IBM Guardium Data Protection EUVDEUVD-2026-119730

| CVE-2026-84030 MEDIUM
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-11-08 ibm GHSA-cpf2-9mxx-3hjv
5.6
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach Guardium network interface
  2. Delivery
    Submit crafted input with special SQL elements
  3. Exploit
    Bypass improper input neutralization
  4. Execution
    Execute injected SQL commands
  5. Impact
    Access or modify limited data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation targets IBM Guardium Data Protection version 12.2.4 via a network-reachable interface, with the CVSS vector indicating no authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) required. However, the CVSS AC:H rating signals that successful exploitation depends on conditions beyond attacker control or specific requirements that are not enumerated in the available sources - the exact vulnerable feature, parameter, or configuration is not described, so the precise trigger cannot be confirmed from the provided data. Limiting factors: attacker must have network access to the Guardium management/data interface (typically deployed on internal or segmented networks), the elevated attack complexity reduces reliability, and the impact is only Low across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, bounding the achievable damage.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity SQL injection (CWE-89) in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4, carrying a vendor CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). The signals point to a lower real-world priority rather than an urgent emergency: the network attack vector and PR:N (unauthenticated) raise exposure, but AC:H (high attack complexity) and only Low partial impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability constrain the practical severity. No EPSS score was supplied, the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and no proof-of-concept or exploit reference is provided - there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month', consistent with a patch-on-normal-cadence item rather than act_now/emergency. Key caveat: the AC:H rating and the exact nature of the 'improper neutralization' trigger are not explained in the available sources, so the mechanism and whether authentication is truly absent in real deployments should be verified against the IBM advisory. The disclosure is self-reported by IBM, which typically indicates internal or coordinated discovery rather than observed in-the-wild abuse.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker submits specially crafted input to an affected Guardium Data Protection interface where special SQL elements are not properly neutralized, injecting SQL that the backend executes. Given the Low impact ratings, this could expose or alter limited database contents or cause limited disruption rather than full database takeover. No public exploit code is available, and the CVSS AC:H rating suggests non-trivial conditions must be met for successful exploitation, though the specific trigger is not described in the available sources.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Nov 08, 2026

SQL injection (CWE-89) in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 lets a remote attacker inject arbitrary SQL commands through a network-reachable interface, potentially reading or altering data with low impact across confidentiality, integrity and availability (vendor CVSS 3.1 base score 5.6). The CVSS vector shows no authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N) required, but AC:H indicates exploitation depends on conditions beyond attacker control that the available sources do not enumerate, so the exact vulnerable parameter or feature is unconfirmed. No public exploit code or PoC reference is identified in the supplied data and there is no KEV listing; IBM has published a vendor fix via its support page.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor fix referenced in IBM's support flash at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7295791, which is listed as the patch reference for this issue; the specific fixed version or fix pack level is not stated in the supplied data, so confirm the required level against that advisory before closing the finding on Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 deployments. Because the available data does not identify the vulnerable interface, parameter or feature, no targeted configuration workaround can be prescribed with confidence; restricting network reachability of Guardium management and data interfaces to trusted administrative segments is consistent with the deployment model and reduces exposure but does not correct the underlying injection flaw, and does not substitute for the vendor update.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command (CWE-89), meaning user-supplied input reaching a database query is not correctly escaped or parameterized, allowing SQL syntax to be injected. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is wildcarded, but the description pins the issue to version 12.2.4 of IBM's Guardium Data Protection appliance, a database activity monitoring and data security platform whose management and data interfaces are typically deployed on internal or segmented networks. The vulnerable component - whether a web console endpoint, reporting module or API - is not described in the available sources, and the AC:H metric indicates the trigger involves requirements not enumerated there; the specific query path, parameter and any preconditions required to reach it are unverified. Impact is bounded to Low for confidentiality, integrity and availability under the assessed vector, so the injection would yield limited data exposure or modification rather than full system compromise.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY MEDIUM
NVD 5.6 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 5.6 MEDIUM

Network-reachable unauthenticated SQLi (AV:N/PR:N); AC:H retained from vendor as the trigger conditions are undescribed; limited partial impact gives C:L/I:L/A:L with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionNVD

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Prevalence
Low
specialized enterprise database-security/activity-monitoring appliance, limited deployment footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS N/A
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

CVE-2026-85542 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 25

Authenticated command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a user who can reach the GIM (Guardium Insta

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy