Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach Guardium network interface
-
DeliverySubmit crafted input with special SQL elements
-
ExploitBypass improper input neutralization
-
ExecutionExecute injected SQL commands
-
ImpactAccess or modify limited data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation targets IBM Guardium Data Protection version 12.2.4 via a network-reachable interface, with the CVSS vector indicating no authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) required. However, the CVSS AC:H rating signals that successful exploitation depends on conditions beyond attacker control or specific requirements that are not enumerated in the available sources - the exact vulnerable feature, parameter, or configuration is not described, so the precise trigger cannot be confirmed from the provided data. Limiting factors: attacker must have network access to the Guardium management/data interface (typically deployed on internal or segmented networks), the elevated attack complexity reduces reliability, and the impact is only Low across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, bounding the achievable damage. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity SQL injection (CWE-89) in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4, carrying a vendor CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). The signals point to a lower real-world priority rather than an urgent emergency: the network attack vector and PR:N (unauthenticated) raise exposure, but AC:H (high attack complexity) and only Low partial impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability constrain the practical severity. No EPSS score was supplied, the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and no proof-of-concept or exploit reference is provided - there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month', consistent with a patch-on-normal-cadence item rather than act_now/emergency. Key caveat: the AC:H rating and the exact nature of the 'improper neutralization' trigger are not explained in the available sources, so the mechanism and whether authentication is truly absent in real deployments should be verified against the IBM advisory. The disclosure is self-reported by IBM, which typically indicates internal or coordinated discovery rather than observed in-the-wild abuse. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote attacker submits specially crafted input to an affected Guardium Data Protection interface where special SQL elements are not properly neutralized, injecting SQL that the backend executes. Given the Low impact ratings, this could expose or alter limited database contents or cause limited disruption rather than full database takeover. No public exploit code is available, and the CVSS AC:H rating suggests non-trivial conditions must be met for successful exploitation, though the specific trigger is not described in the available sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 08, 2026
SQL injection (CWE-89) in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 lets a remote attacker inject arbitrary SQL commands through a network-reachable interface, potentially reading or altering data with low impact across confidentiality, integrity and availability (vendor CVSS 3.1 base score 5.6). The CVSS vector shows no authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N) required, but AC:H indicates exploitation depends on conditions beyond attacker control that the available sources do not enumerate, so the exact vulnerable parameter or feature is unconfirmed. No public exploit code or PoC reference is identified in the supplied data and there is no KEV listing; IBM has published a vendor fix via its support page.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor fix referenced in IBM's support flash at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7295791, which is listed as the patch reference for this issue; the specific fixed version or fix pack level is not stated in the supplied data, so confirm the required level against that advisory before closing the finding on Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 deployments. Because the available data does not identify the vulnerable interface, parameter or feature, no targeted configuration workaround can be prescribed with confidence; restricting network reachability of Guardium management and data interfaces to trusted administrative segments is consistent with the deployment model and reduces exposure but does not correct the underlying injection flaw, and does not substitute for the vendor update.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command (CWE-89), meaning user-supplied input reaching a database query is not correctly escaped or parameterized, allowing SQL syntax to be injected. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is wildcarded, but the description pins the issue to version 12.2.4 of IBM's Guardium Data Protection appliance, a database activity monitoring and data security platform whose management and data interfaces are typically deployed on internal or segmented networks. The vulnerable component - whether a web console endpoint, reporting module or API - is not described in the available sources, and the AC:H metric indicates the trigger involves requirements not enumerated there; the specific query path, parameter and any preconditions required to reach it are unverified. Impact is bounded to Low for confidentiality, integrity and availability under the assessed vector, so the injection would yield limited data exposure or modification rather than full system compromise.
Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Network-reachable unauthenticated SQLi (AV:N/PR:N); AC:H retained from vendor as the trigger conditions are undescribed; limited partial impact gives C:L/I:L/A:L with unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
More in Guardium Data Protection
View allAuthenticated command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a user who can reach the GIM (Guardium Insta
SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma
Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang
Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app
Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers
Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2
Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac
Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen
Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent
Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c
A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u
EUVD-2026-119730
GHSA-cpf2-9mxx-3hjv
NVD
CVE.org
Exploit-DB