Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain reachability to Grid Network ports
-
DeliveryCraft requests using product-specific knowledge
-
ExploitBypass authentication controls
-
ExecutionIssue unauthorized grid requests
-
ImpactAccess or alter stored data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires two specific prerequisites stated in the description: (1) network-level ability to communicate with the StorageGRID Grid Network on certain ports - the Grid Network is StorageGRID's internal inter-node network, which is typically segmented from general/client networks, so the attacker must already be able to reach it; and (2) 'product-specific knowledge' of how to form the unauthorized requests, which maps to the CVSS AT:P (attack requirement present) and AC:H metrics. Affected scope is StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions 11.3 and higher. No authentication is required once these conditions are met (PR:N). The limiting factors - required Grid Network reachability and specialized product knowledge - meaningfully reduce the realistic attacker population compared to the AV:N network rating, favoring post-compromise or insider scenarios over broad remote exploitation. |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority issue, though its real-world exploitability is more constrained than the 9.1 base score suggests in isolation. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable flaw requiring no authentication (PR:N) but carrying both high attack complexity (AC:H) and a present attack requirement (AT:P) - the latter aligns with the description's 'product-specific knowledge' and 'ability to communicate with the Grid Network on certain ports,' meaning the attacker needs internal network positioning and specialized knowledge rather than trivial internet-wide access. Impact is high to confidentiality and integrity (VC:H/VI:H) with no availability impact (VA:N) and no scope/subsequent-system change. The vuln.today 'act_now' decision label elevates urgency, so this should be treated as a near-term remediation priority. However, key corroborating signals are MISSING: no EPSS probability, no CISA KEV listing, and no POC reference are present in the input, so there is currently no evidence of active or imminent widespread exploitation - the urgency rests on the vendor-reported severity and the decision label, not on observed in-the-wild activity. The AV:N designation is somewhat in tension with the requirement to reach the internal Grid Network (typically a segmented back-end network), suggesting exploitation realistically depends on prior network access rather than pure internet exposure - verify network segmentation with NetApp guidance. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already gained a foothold on, or can route traffic to, the segmented StorageGRID Grid Network leverages product-specific knowledge to craft requests to specific service ports, bypassing authentication to issue unauthorized requests against grid services. Because exploitation requires both Grid Network reachability and specialized knowledge (reflected in AC:H/AT:P), it is more plausible as a post-compromise lateral-movement or insider action than as an opportunistic internet-facing attack. No public exploit identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
NetApp StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) 11.3 and later permits unauthorized requests to be issued against the product by a remote party that can reach the Grid Network on specific ports, with no authentication needed once reachability is established; the CVSS:4.0 vector rates it 9.1 with high confidentiality and integrity impact but no availability impact. Exploitation is not trivial: it demands both access to the Grid Network - StorageGRID's internal inter-node network, normally segmented away from client and general-purpose networks - and product-specific knowledge of how to construct the malicious requests, which is captured by the AC:H and AT:P metrics and makes insider or post-compromise scenarios more plausible than broad internet-facing attacks. The issue is tagged for immediate action (act_now) by vuln.today and NetApp published advisory NTAP-20261103-0001; no public exploit code or CISA KEV entry was identified in the supplied data.
RemediationAI
Consult NetApp advisory NTAP-20261103-0001 (https://security.netapp.com/advisory/NTAP-20261103-0001) for the corrected StorageGRID release and upgrade every 11.3-or-later deployment to it; the supplied data does not specify an exact fix version, so validate the target release against the advisory before scheduling maintenance. Because the attack prerequisite is the ability to communicate with the Grid Network on the ports involved, the effective compensating control is network segmentation: keep the Grid Network isolated from client, admin and general-purpose networks and permit only the documented inter-node traffic from known StorageGRID node addresses, which shrinks the set of hosts able to reach the vulnerable interface at the cost of tighter firewall and routing maintenance and a greater risk of breaking legitimate node-to-node operations if rules are too restrictive. Restricting management and monitoring access to the grid to trusted jump hosts adds a second layer, but neither measure removes the underlying flaw, and neither the advisory text nor the supplied data documents any product-level feature toggle that disables the affected request path.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw lives in the proprietary inter-node communication layer of NetApp StorageGRID, an object storage platform whose nodes exchange coordination and control traffic over a dedicated Grid Network rather than the client-facing or admin networks. Because the request-handling path trusts callers that can reach that network segment, an attacker positioned there can craft unauthorized requests that the service accepts without authentication, yielding high confidentiality and integrity loss (read and modify) but no availability impact. The CVSS:4.0 vector AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N indicates that while the attack surface is network-reachable and requires no privileges or user interaction, a distinct attack requirement (AT:P) is present and attack complexity is high - here the requirement is twofold: Grid Network reachability on the relevant ports plus product-specific knowledge of the request format. No CWE was assigned in the supplied data, so the precise root-cause class (for example, missing authorization check versus trust boundary confusion) is not confirmed by the available sources.
Know when Storagegrid Formerly Storagegrid Webscale gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
AV:N with AC:H reflects required Grid Network reachability plus product-specific knowledge; PR:N since no authentication is needed; C:H/I:H/A:N and S:U match the unauthorized-request impact and unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (netapp).
CVSS VectorVendor: netapp
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions 11.3 and higher allow an attacker with product-specific knowledge and the ability to communicate with the Grid Network on certain ports to make unauthorized requests.
Executive ViewAI
A critical vulnerability in NetApp StorageGRID (versions 11.3 and later) allows unauthorized access to data and operations when an attacker can reach the internal Grid Network. This puts sensitive storage content and integrity at risk, though exploitation requires network access and product knowledge, making insider or post-compromise scenarios more likely than broad internet attacks. Leadership should prioritize patching and network segmentation to protect critical data assets.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict access to the Grid Network to only trusted hosts and networks, implement strict firewall rules to block unauthorized traffic to the affected ports, and monitor for malicious requests. Ensure the Grid Network is segmented from client and general-purpose networks.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Unauthenticated remote access to internal-use APIs in NetApp StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) exposes a limit
NetApp ONTAP 9 (before 9.18.1), StorageGRID (through 12.2.0) and affected E-Series SANtricity OS Controller Software bui
StorageGRID versions before 11.9.0.13 and 12.0.0.6 allow authenticated attackers with low privileges to execute arbitrar
EUVD-2026-116529
GHSA-h4vc-x53f-c73h
NVD
CVE.org
Exploit-DB