Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessHost malicious framing page
-
DeliveryLure victim to attacker page
-
ExploitFrame Alosuite login (no X-Frame-Options)
-
ExecutionOverlay deceptive UI to hijack clicks
-
ImpactTrigger unwanted action in framed app
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Clickjacking prevention, X-Frame-Options
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The precondition is that the Alosuite login interface is served without framing protection - it does not set the X-Frame-Options header nor a Content-Security-Policy frame-ancestors directive - allowing it to be embedded in an attacker-controlled iframe. Exploitation is limited by the requirement for active victim interaction (CVSS UI:A): the attacker must socially engineer an authenticated or targeted user into visiting a malicious page and clicking on the disguised framed interface. Impact is confined to integrity of user interactions (VI:L); there is no confidentiality or availability impact, and no attacker authentication is required (PR:N). |
| Impact | This is a moderate, low-urgency issue consistent with a CVSS 4.0 base of 5.1. The vendor-supplied vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A) shows a network-reachable flaw requiring no attacker privileges but active victim interaction, with only limited integrity impact (VI:L) and no confidentiality or availability impact (VC:N/VA:N). This matches the mechanism: a missing X-Frame-Options / CSP frame-ancestors control that permits the login interface to be framed (clickjacking, CWE-1021). The priority signals are consistent and modest: the vuln.today Decision label is 'this_month' (not act_now/emergency), there is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS probability is provided, and no PoC or exploit reference is supplied - only an INCIBE advisory. No signals conflict. Realistically this is a genuine but low-severity defensive hygiene finding whose exploitation depends entirely on social-engineering a victim, not a widespread automated-exploitation threat. One caveat to verify: the input Tags label this 'XSS', which contradicts the CWE-1021 (clickjacking) classification and the description - the referenced INCIBE advisory covers multiple Alo Suite vulnerabilities, so the XSS tag likely belongs to a different CVE in that bundle. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker builds a malicious web page that loads the Alosuite login interface inside a hidden or disguised iframe and overlays deceptive UI. A victim who is lured to the page and tricked into clicking is actually interacting with the framed Alosuite application, triggering unwanted actions. No public exploit code is identified; success requires active user interaction as reflected in UI:A. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
Clickjacking in the AM Systems Alo Suite web application lets an attacker embed the login interface inside an attacker-controlled page and trick a victim into clicking disguised controls, so the practical impact is tampering with user interactions rather than disclosure of data. Deployments are exposed when the login page is served without X-Frame-Options or a Content-Security-Policy frame-ancestors directive; the CPE entry carries a wildcard version, so no specific release range is pinned in the available data. Severity is moderate (CVSS 4.0 base 5.1, integrity-only impact rated Low, active user interaction required), the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so the primary actionable fix is to make the login interface unframeable: have the web server or reverse proxy in front of Alosuite return X-Frame-Options: DENY (or SAMEORIGIN where same-origin framing is genuinely needed) and a matching Content-Security-Policy frame-ancestors 'self' directive on the authentication pages, then verify with a header check that both are present on every login route. The trade-off is that legitimate embedding - SSO portals, intranet dashboards or partner integrations that frame the login page - will break, so inventory those consumers first and scope the policy to the authentication paths rather than the whole application. JavaScript frame-busting is a weaker fallback that can be bypassed and should not replace the headers, and users should be told to reach Alosuite through bookmarked or typed URLs rather than links from unsolicited pages while the header fix is rolled out. Track the INCIBE-CERT advisory at https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-am-systems-alo-suite for the vendor's fixed-release guidance; given the moderate, low-urgency rating and interaction-dependent exploitation, remediation can be scheduled in the normal monthly cycle rather than treated as an emergency.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The weakness is CWE-1021 (Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames), the classic UI-redressal class: the application does not tell the browser whether its pages may be framed, so any third-party site can load the Alosuite login interface in an iframe and overlay or disguise it. Note that the intelligence feed carries an 'XSS' tag, but the described and independently assessed weakness is clickjacking, and the available sources describe no cross-site scripting mechanism. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A, VC:N/VI:L/VA:N) matches the assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N): no attacker authentication is required (PR:N), the attack surface is network-reachable, and the only scored impact is low integrity (VI:L) with no confidentiality or availability effect. The UI:A component is decisive - the attacker must socially engineer a targeted user into visiting a malicious page and clicking within the framed interface, so the flaw is not self-triggering and the exact framing behaviour of a given deployment depends on how the front end or reverse proxy sets response headers, which is not detailed in the available sources.
Know when Alo Suite gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-framable login with no attacker privileges (PR:N) but mandatory victim interaction (UI:R); only limited integrity impact from hijacked clicks, no confidentiality or availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (INCIBE).
CVSS VectorVendor: INCIBE
DescriptionCVE.org
Clickjacking vulnerability in the Alosuite web application. The affected login interface can be embedded in a web page controlled by an attacker because it does not implement adequate user interface protection mechanisms, such as the X-Frame-Options header or an appropriate Content-Security-Policy (frame-ancestors) directive. By tricking a victim into interacting with a malicious web page, an attacker can trigger unwanted actions within the Alosuite application embedded in the frame, which could compromise the integrity of user interactions and facilitate further attacks against authenticated users.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Alo Suite's user-invitation workflow can assign administrative privileges to a newly invited account because the '/Reque
Alo Suite's password recovery endpoint '/Account/resetPwd' lacks rate and frequency limits, so remote attackers can repe
Unauthenticated information disclosure in AM Systems Alo Suite allows remote attackers to read records belonging to othe
Stored cross-site scripting in AM System's Alo Suite lets an authenticated user persist JavaScript through the 'Nombre'
Stored cross-site scripting in AM System Alo Suite's delivery-note functionality allows an authenticated user to persist
Stored cross-site scripting in Alo Suite (AM System) lets an authenticated user with access to the mail-template editor
Stored cross-site scripting in AM System's Alo Suite lets an authenticated user persist JavaScript through the 'Nombre'
Stored cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in AM System Alo Suite lets an authenticated, low-privileged user persist JavaScrip
Stored cross-site scripting in Alo Suite lets an authenticated user with access to /Inmuebles/Create persist JavaScript
Stored cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in AM System's Alo Suite lets an authenticated low-privilege user plant JavaScript
Stored cross-site scripting in AM System's Alo Suite lets authenticated users with access to the current-accounts creati
Stored cross-site scripting in AM Systems Alo Suite lets an authenticated user with write access to the 'Codigo' field o
EUVD-2026-115798
GHSA-hvf9-wq6h-px7p
NVD
CVE.org
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB