Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged user
-
ExploitSupply crafted -exec argument to Find handler
-
ExecutionInject OS command via CWE-78 flaw
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary commands in application context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to reach the Find Command Handler and control the -exec argument, which per the CVSS vector demands low-level authenticated privileges (PR:L) to the Minimax Code application plus passive user interaction (UI:P) to complete the attack. The limiting factors are therefore: a valid low-privilege account is needed (not fully unauthenticated), the attack cannot succeed without the required user interaction, and only Minimax Code version 0.5.8 is identified as affected. The vendor rated confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts as Low, suggesting the injected commands execute in a constrained context rather than yielding full host takeover, though the sources do not describe the execution privileges in detail. |
| Impact | This is a medium-severity issue (CVSS 4.0 base 5.1) that does not rise to an urgent, widespread priority despite being an OS command injection (CWE-78) flaw. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L) indicates a network-reachable attack with low complexity but requires low-level privileges (PR:L) AND passive user interaction (UI:P), and the vendor rated all three impacts as Low rather than the full system compromise command injection often implies. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' - meaningful but not emergency/act_now. There is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score was supplied, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the input; absence of an EPSS value is a data gap, not evidence of low risk. No POC field was provided, but the references include an external Feishu (feishu.cn) document alongside the VulDB CTI entries, so a public reference likely containing exploitation detail exists though it is not verified as working exploit code. The dominant risk-limiting factor is the product itself: an obscure, single-vendor tool from Shanghai Xi Yu Ji Zhi Technology with no enterprise footprint, meaning real-world exposure is minimal regardless of the technical mechanism. Net: a legitimate but low-urgency issue - the low privilege requirement, required user interaction, Low-rated impacts, and rare deployment outweigh the network attack vector. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged authenticated user of Minimax Code 0.5.8 supplies a crafted value to the -exec argument of the Find Command Handler, injecting attacker-controlled OS commands that the application executes. Because the CVSS vector specifies UI:P, some passive user interaction is a prerequisite for the attack to succeed. A public reference describing the issue exists, but it is not verified as working exploit code. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 01, 2026
OS command injection in Minimax Code 0.5.8 lets an attacker who controls the -exec argument of the Find Command Handler inject and execute operating-system commands. Exploitation requires a valid low-privilege account (PR:L) plus passive user interaction (UI:P), and only version 0.5.8 is identified as affected; the vector's low confidentiality, integrity and availability ratings indicate command execution in a constrained context rather than full host takeover. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, the vendor was contacted but did not respond, and this is tracked as a medium-severity, this-month priority item rather than an emergency.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch was identified at time of analysis: the disclosure states the vendor was contacted early and did not respond, and no fixed version is published in the available references, so operators should track the VulDB entry at https://vuldb.com/vuln/429619 for updates. In the interim, treat the Find Command Handler as a privileged feature: restrict its use to trusted accounts, since exploitation already requires a valid low-privilege login, and remove or tightly allowlist the -exec argument so that shell metacharacters cannot be supplied (the trade-off is loss of legitimate batch-find functionality). Run Minimax Code under a dedicated low-privilege service account with no access to sensitive filesystems or credentials, which limits the blast radius if injection succeeds without preventing it, and monitor process and shell-spawn logs for find invocations that launch unexpected child commands. Disabling or gating the Find Command Handler entirely until a fixed release appears is the most reliable compensating control, at the cost of the feature's availability.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a classic OS command injection (CWE-78) in the Find Command Handler component of Minimax Code, the AI-assisted coding tool published by Shanghai Xi Yu Ji Zhi Technology. The handler evidently builds and runs a system-level find invocation whose -exec argument is passed through to a shell without adequate neutralisation, so metacharacters supplied in that argument can break out of the intended command and run additional commands under the account running the application. CPE data identifies the affected package as shanghai_xi_yu_ji_zhi_technology:minimax_code with no version bound in the string, while the disclosure text names 0.5.8 specifically. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P) shows the attack is network-reachable and needs no special preconditions, but does require low-level authenticated access and a degree of user interaction to complete; the exact trigger path and the privileges under which injected commands execute are not described in the available sources.
Know when Minimax Code gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable with low complexity, but a low-privilege account (PR:L) and user interaction (UI:R) are required; impacts kept Low to match the evidence, which indicates constrained rather than full command execution.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB
DescriptionCVE.org
A security flaw has been discovered in Shanghai Xi Yu Ji Zhi Technology Minimax Code 0.5.8. This affects an unknown part of the component Find Command Handler. The manipulation of the argument -exec results in os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
EUVD-2026-114905
GHSA-p8vc-6wf8-q86x
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB