Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as author or editor (JWT/API key)
-
ExploitSend crafted write to /api/content or /api/:collection
-
ExecutionCoarse role check passes, document ACL not enforced
-
ImpactModify, publish, or soft-delete other users' documents
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a valid, already-authenticated SonicJS account at author or editor role, presented as a bearer JWT or API key - it is NOT exploitable by fully unauthenticated users. The attacker targets the /api/:collection and /api/content write routes, which enforce only coarse role labels and fail to apply per-document ACLs or administrator deny overrides, allowing write/publish/soft-delete against documents the account does not own. Limiting factors: a low-privilege credential must be obtained first; the flaw affects SonicJS through 3.0.0; impact is confined to content integrity and soft-deletion (no data disclosure); and a vendor fix (PR #1147) removes the condition once applied. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but bounded authorization flaw (CWE-862) rather than a critical unauthenticated takeover. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) and the description agree: exploitation is network-based and low-complexity but requires an already-authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L - an author or editor holding a bearer JWT or API key), so this is NOT remote-unauthenticated. Impact is integrity-centric (VI:H - create/modify/publish/soft-delete of other users' documents, bypassing document ACLs and admin deny overrides) with limited availability impact (VA:L, via soft-delete) and no confidentiality impact (VC:N - the flaw is on write routes, not read disclosure). Decision signals point to prompt-but-not-emergency handling: the vuln.today priority label is 'this_week', the issue was reported by VulnCheck (with a dedicated advisory), and a vendor patch exists (PR #1147). No EPSS score and no KEV status were supplied in the input, so widespread or active exploitation cannot be asserted. A public PoC reference exists (a hackmd writeup of the ACL bypass) but it is not verified as working exploit code. Net: a real priority for any SonicJS deployment that grants author/editor accounts to semi-trusted users, but the required low-privilege foothold keeps this below a drop-everything emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds a low-privilege author or editor account on a SonicJS instance (via a bearer JWT or API key) sends write requests to the /api/:collection or /api/content routes, which only check coarse role labels. Because per-document ACLs and administrator deny overrides are not enforced, the attacker creates, modifies, publishes, or soft-deletes content owned by other users. A public writeup of the bypass exists but is not verified as working exploit code. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 30, 2026
Authenticated users with author or editor roles in SonicJS through 3.0.0 can create, modify, publish, or soft-delete documents they do not own because the content write routes check only coarse role labels and fail to enforce per-document ACLs or administrator deny overrides. The flaw requires a valid bearer JWT or API key and is bounded to content integrity and availability rather than data disclosure. A vendor fix is referenced by PR #1147, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis is reported in the supplied data, with no CISA KEV entry listed.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor fix referenced by PR #1147 at https://github.com/SonicJs-Org/sonicjs/pull/1147; a released patched version number is not specified in the supplied data, so upgrading to a build containing that change is required. Until then, restrict author/editor accounts and bearer JWT or API key issuance to trusted users, review document ACLs and administrator deny overrides, and monitor writes to /api/:collection and /api/content for unexpected publish or soft-delete activity; these are compensating measures and do not close the missing-authorization path. Consult the vendor advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sonicjs-through-3.0.0-missing-authorization-in-content-write-api and issue https://github.com/SonicJs-Org/sonicjs/issues/1125.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
SonicJS is a Hono-based content management system backed by D1/SQLite documents, document types, RBAC roles, and a document_permissions table that supports allow and deny effects. The root cause is CWE-862 Missing Authorization: the /api/:collection and /api/content write handlers gate actions on broad role labels such as author or editor but do not evaluate the per-document ACL or an administrator deny override before performing create, update, publish, or soft-delete operations. The supplied patch tests describe the intended policy: content writes must pass document ACL or RBAC grant checks, deny must win, internal document types must be refused, and /documents/:typeId/* must match the row's actual type. The exact request sequence used to bypass the route-level checks is not included in the supplied evidence.
Know when Sonicjs gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Authenticated low-privilege author/editor over the API gives PR:L, AV:N, AC:L, UI:N; unauthorized create/modify/publish yields I:H, soft-delete gives A:L, and no read access means C:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
DescriptionCVE.org
SonicJS through 3.0.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the /api/:collection and /api/content write routes that only check coarse role labels. Authenticated authors or editors can use a bearer JWT or API key to create, modify, publish, or soft-delete other users' documents, bypassing document ACLs and administrator deny overrides.
Executive ViewAI
SonicJS content management system versions through 3.0.0 contain a high-severity authorization flaw that allows authenticated author and editor users to modify or delete content they do not own. This could undermine the integrity of published information and disrupt content availability, requiring leadership attention due to potential reputational and operational impacts.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
SonicJS through 0.6.0 allows file overwrite. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.1), this vulnerability is remotely exploita
SonicJS up to v0.7.0 allows attackers to execute an authenticated path traversal when an attacker injects special charac
EUVD-2026-114112
GHSA-4392-9339-gxp5
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB