Skip to main content

SonicJS CVE-2026-119707

| EUVDEUVD-2026-114112 HIGH
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-10-30 VulnCheck GHSA-4392-9339-gxp5
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as author or editor (JWT/API key)
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted write to /api/content or /api/:collection
  3. Execution
    Coarse role check passes, document ACL not enforced
  4. Impact
    Modify, publish, or soft-delete other users' documents

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid, already-authenticated SonicJS account at author or editor role, presented as a bearer JWT or API key - it is NOT exploitable by fully unauthenticated users. The attacker targets the /api/:collection and /api/content write routes, which enforce only coarse role labels and fail to apply per-document ACLs or administrator deny overrides, allowing write/publish/soft-delete against documents the account does not own. Limiting factors: a low-privilege credential must be obtained first; the flaw affects SonicJS through 3.0.0; impact is confined to content integrity and soft-deletion (no data disclosure); and a vendor fix (PR #1147) removes the condition once applied.

Impact

This is a genuine but bounded authorization flaw (CWE-862) rather than a critical unauthenticated takeover. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) and the description agree: exploitation is network-based and low-complexity but requires an already-authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L - an author or editor holding a bearer JWT or API key), so this is NOT remote-unauthenticated. Impact is integrity-centric (VI:H - create/modify/publish/soft-delete of other users' documents, bypassing document ACLs and admin deny overrides) with limited availability impact (VA:L, via soft-delete) and no confidentiality impact (VC:N - the flaw is on write routes, not read disclosure). Decision signals point to prompt-but-not-emergency handling: the vuln.today priority label is 'this_week', the issue was reported by VulnCheck (with a dedicated advisory), and a vendor patch exists (PR #1147). No EPSS score and no KEV status were supplied in the input, so widespread or active exploitation cannot be asserted. A public PoC reference exists (a hackmd writeup of the ACL bypass) but it is not verified as working exploit code. Net: a real priority for any SonicJS deployment that grants author/editor accounts to semi-trusted users, but the required low-privilege foothold keeps this below a drop-everything emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already holds a low-privilege author or editor account on a SonicJS instance (via a bearer JWT or API key) sends write requests to the /api/:collection or /api/content routes, which only check coarse role labels. Because per-document ACLs and administrator deny overrides are not enforced, the attacker creates, modifies, publishes, or soft-deletes content owned by other users. A public writeup of the bypass exists but is not verified as working exploit code.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 30, 2026

Authenticated users with author or editor roles in SonicJS through 3.0.0 can create, modify, publish, or soft-delete documents they do not own because the content write routes check only coarse role labels and fail to enforce per-document ACLs or administrator deny overrides. The flaw requires a valid bearer JWT or API key and is bounded to content integrity and availability rather than data disclosure. A vendor fix is referenced by PR #1147, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis is reported in the supplied data, with no CISA KEV entry listed.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor fix referenced by PR #1147 at https://github.com/SonicJs-Org/sonicjs/pull/1147; a released patched version number is not specified in the supplied data, so upgrading to a build containing that change is required. Until then, restrict author/editor accounts and bearer JWT or API key issuance to trusted users, review document ACLs and administrator deny overrides, and monitor writes to /api/:collection and /api/content for unexpected publish or soft-delete activity; these are compensating measures and do not close the missing-authorization path. Consult the vendor advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sonicjs-through-3.0.0-missing-authorization-in-content-write-api and issue https://github.com/SonicJs-Org/sonicjs/issues/1125.

Affected VersionsENISA

sonicjs 0 ≤3.0.0

Affected Packages

euvd sonicjs no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

SonicJS is a Hono-based content management system backed by D1/SQLite documents, document types, RBAC roles, and a document_permissions table that supports allow and deny effects. The root cause is CWE-862 Missing Authorization: the /api/:collection and /api/content write handlers gate actions on broad role labels such as author or editor but do not evaluate the per-document ACL or an administrator deny override before performing create, update, publish, or soft-delete operations. The supplied patch tests describe the intended policy: content writes must pass document ACL or RBAC grant checks, deny must win, internal document types must be refused, and /documents/:typeId/* must match the row's actual type. The exact request sequence used to bypass the route-level checks is not included in the supplied evidence.

Know when Sonicjs gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.1 HIGH

Authenticated low-privilege author/editor over the API gives PR:L, AV:N, AC:L, UI:N; unauthorized create/modify/publish yields I:H, soft-delete gives A:L, and no read access means C:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

SonicJS through 3.0.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the /api/:collection and /api/content write routes that only check coarse role labels. Authenticated authors or editors can use a bearer JWT or API key to create, modify, publish, or soft-delete other users' documents, bypassing document ACLs and administrator deny overrides.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

SonicJS content management system versions through 3.0.0 contain a high-severity authorization flaw that allows authenticated author and editor users to modify or delete content they do not own. This could undermine the integrity of published information and disrupt content availability, requiring leadership attention due to potential reputational and operational impacts.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 76% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source headless CMS, limited production deployment footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Medium

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy