Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege local account
  2. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters into SiteGuard input
  3. Execution
    Command runs as root/SYSTEM
  4. Impact
    Full host compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires LOCAL access to the host running SiteGuard Server Edition (AV:L) together with a low-privilege authenticated account or foothold (PR:L) - it is NOT remotely exploitable over the network and cannot be triggered by an anonymous external WAF client. Once that foothold exists, no user interaction is needed (UI:N) and complexity is low (AC:L); the attacker injects OS command metacharacters into an affected SiteGuard input path that is passed to a shell, escalating to root (Apache httpd/nginx on Linux or FreeBSD) or SYSTEM (IIS on Windows). The primary limiting factors are the mandatory local access and the requirement for an existing low-privilege account; the affected editions span Apache httpd, nginx, and IIS variants including FreeBSD builds, per the CPE list.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector (base score 8.5) describes a LOCAL attack vector (AV:L) requiring low privileges (PR:L) with no user interaction (UI:N) and low attack complexity (AC:L), yielding high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) confined to the vulnerable system (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). In practice this is a local privilege-escalation-class OS command injection: an attacker who already holds a low-privilege foothold on the host can execute arbitrary OS commands as root or SYSTEM. The signals are internally CONSISTENT - AV:L matches the 'on the system running the affected product' language in the description, so this is not a network-reachable bug despite being a web-infrastructure (WAF) product. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or weaponization. This tempers urgency: the high base score reflects the severe root/SYSTEM impact, not ease of remote mass-exploitation. It is a genuine priority for hardening on hosts where untrusted or lower-tier accounts exist, but the local-only vector and required pre-existing privilege substantially narrow real-world exposure compared to a network-unauthenticated flaw. EPSS/KEV absence is a data gap, not confirmation of safety.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with an existing low-privilege account or foothold on a server running SiteGuard Server Edition supplies crafted input to a vulnerable SiteGuard component, which passes it unsanitized to an OS shell. The injected command executes with root (Linux/FreeBSD) or SYSTEM (IIS/Windows) privileges, giving full host takeover. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, and the local attack vector (AV:L) means the attacker must first obtain local/authenticated access.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Oct 14, 2026

OS command injection in EG Secure Solutions' SiteGuard Server Edition allows an attacker who already holds a low-privilege account or foothold on the host to execute arbitrary OS commands as root (Apache httpd/nginx on Linux or FreeBSD) or SYSTEM (IIS on Windows), achieving full compromise of the affected server. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.5 reflects a local attack vector (AV:L) with low privileges (PR:L), no user interaction (UI:N), low complexity (AC:L), and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact confined to the vulnerable system (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H, SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) - it is not remotely exploitable by an anonymous external client. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis; JPCERT/CC reported the issue and EG Secure Solutions and JVN have published advisories.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Oct 14, 2026 - 05:15 CVSS 7.8

OS command injection in SiteGuard Server Edition (CWE-78) allows a locally authenticated, low-privileged user on the host to execute arbitrary operating-system commands with root or SYSTEM privileges, resulting in full compromise of the machine running the product. The issue affects the Apache httpd, nginx, and IIS editions as well as the FreeBSD variants for Apache httpd and nginx, and per the assessed vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) it is not reachable by an anonymous remote attacker against a default install but rather serves as a privilege-escalation and full-system-takeover primitive once an initial foothold exists. There is no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis; EPSS data was not supplied, so risk is driven by the local attack prerequisite and the high confidentiality/integrity/availability impact of successful exploitation.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor fix identified in the EG Secure Solutions advisory (https://www.eg-secure.co.jp/siteguard/news/alert-202610-1) and the JVN advisory (https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN88474777/); the available input does not specify an exact patched version, so confirm the applicable fixed release with those advisories before upgrading. Until the update is applied, reduce exposure by treating the local low-privilege account requirement as the primary control: audit and remove unnecessary local accounts and shell access on hosts running SiteGuard, since exploitation demands an existing foothold (AV:L/PR:L) and cannot be triggered by an anonymous remote client. Additional compensating measures include restricting interactive login to trusted administrators and monitoring SiteGuard host processes for anomalous child shell invocations, though these do not remove the CWE-78 input path and carry the trade-off of added operational overhead without fully eliminating the escalation risk. If patching is delayed, consider isolating the affected web server host through network segmentation and host-based monitoring so that any successful local escalation is detected quickly.

Affected VersionsENISA

SiteGuard Server Edition for Nginx Ver2.20 <Ver8.00 Update 5
SiteGuard Server Edition for Apache httpd Ver2.20 <Ver8.00 Update 5
SiteGuard Server Edition for Nginx on FreeBSD Ver2.20 <Ver7.00 Update 6
SiteGuard Server Edition for IIS Ver2.20 <Ver8.00 Update 5

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic OS command injection (CWE-78) in the SiteGuard Server Edition web application firewall / server-protection component, which is deployed as an integration module for Apache httpd, nginx, and Microsoft IIS, including dedicated builds for FreeBSD. The root cause is that an affected input path is passed to a system shell without adequate neutralization of shell metacharacters, so an attacker able to reach that path can append or substitute commands that the underlying shell executes with the privileges of the SiteGuard service - root on Linux/FreeBSD and SYSTEM on Windows. Because the vulnerable code runs with elevated service privileges, the injection yields a direct local privilege escalation to full host control rather than merely influencing application logic. The CPE entries confirm five distinct impacted editions (Apache httpd, nginx, IIS, Apache httpd on FreeBSD, and nginx on FreeBSD), all version-unspecified in the current feed; the effective exploit prerequisite remains the local access and low-privilege foothold described in the assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N).

Know when Siteguard Server Edition For Apache Httpd gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (jpcert) PRIMARY 8.5 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local-only command injection by an authenticated low-privilege user (AV:L, PR:L, AC:L) escalating to root/SYSTEM gives full C:H/I:H/A:H with no scope change (S:U).

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (jpcert).

CVSS VectorVendor: jpcert

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 05:22 NVD
7.8 (HIGH) 8.5 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 04:45 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

SiteGuard Server Edition contains an OS command injection vulnerability, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands with root or SYSTEM privileges on the system running the affected product.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

EG Secure Solutions' SiteGuard Server Edition contains an OS command injection flaw that lets anyone who already holds a low-privilege account on the host escalate to full root or SYSTEM control of that server. Because SiteGuard typically fronts web-facing infrastructure, a compromised host could expose authentication material, session data, and downstream systems to an attacker who has already gained an initial foothold elsewhere. Leadership should care because the vulnerability converts a contained, low-privilege compromise into complete server takeover, and no vendor patch is currently available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: strictly limit which accounts may log on locally to SiteGuard hosts and remove unnecessary low-privilege accounts; enforce least privilege and MFA for all administrative and interactive access; deploy EDR or application allowlisting to block unexpected shell execution from the IIS, Apache httpd, or nginx worker processes; enable verbose command-line and process-creation logging with SIEM alerting; segment SiteGuard hosts to limit lateral movement; and monitor vendor advisories from EG Secure Solutions and JVN for the patched release and apply it immediately.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 49% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
regional (Japan-market) host-based WAF, limited global enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
3
Sightings
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

63
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +42
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy