Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticated local access to Windows host
-
ExploitAbuse improper Group Policy privilege management
-
ImpactElevate to SYSTEM privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local, interactive or code-execution access on the Windows host as an authenticated low-privileged user (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - this cannot be triggered remotely or anonymously. The affected feature is Windows Group Policy processing; no end-user interaction is needed (UI:N) and complexity is low (AC:L), with no special non-default configuration indicated by the description. Limiting factors: the mandatory existing authenticated foothold and local-only vector confine this to post-compromise privilege escalation, most impactful on shared/multi-user systems (terminal/RDS servers, VDI) and domain-joined endpoints where untrusted users have accounts; the specific required patch level is not stated in the input. |
| Impact | This is a credible but not emergency-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a local, low-complexity privilege escalation requiring an already-authenticated low-privileged user and no user interaction, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the affected system - a classic LPE profile where an attacker who already has a foothold gains SYSTEM. The attack vector (AV:L) and required privileges (PR:L) materially cap the real-world risk: this cannot be exploited remotely or by an unauthenticated actor, so it is a second-stage/post-compromise tool rather than an initial-access or wormable flaw. No EPSS score was supplied, no SSVC decision data was provided, the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, so there is no evidence of active exploitation at this time - exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The one notable data conflict: the input tag 'Authentication Bypass' is inconsistent with the vulnerability class - this is improper privilege management / missing authorization (CWE-862) enabling privilege elevation, not an authentication bypass, and the CVSS PR:L confirms the attacker is already authenticated. Net: patch on a normal Patch-Tuesday cadence as part of Windows servicing, prioritized higher on multi-user hosts, RDS/Citrix session hosts, and domain-joined endpoints where low-privileged users operate. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged but authenticated user (or malware running in that user's context after phishing/initial access) abuses improper privilege management in Windows Group Policy processing on the local machine to elevate to SYSTEM. No user interaction and no additional complexity is required (AC:L/UI:N), so it reliably chains after any foothold on a domain-joined or multi-user Windows host. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code is referenced at the time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Windows Group Policy allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who already has interactive or code-execution access on a Windows host to elevate privileges to a higher-integrity context. The flaw is an access-control weakness (CWE-862) in how a privileged Group Policy operation is authorized, requiring no user interaction (UI:N) and low attack complexity (AC:L) once a foothold exists, which makes it most impactful on shared multi-user systems such as terminal/RDS servers, VDI hosts, and domain-joined endpoints where untrusted users hold accounts. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and Microsoft is credited as the reporting vendor.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released fixed version is specified in the provided data, so the primary action is to consult and apply the Microsoft MSRC update guide for CVE-2026-100217 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-100217) and deploy Microsoft's patched builds as soon as they are available through normal Windows Update/WSUS channels. Until a fixed build is applied, compensating controls should target the mandatory local authenticated foothold: restrict interactive logon rights on shared hosts (RDS/VDI) to trusted accounts, remove or disable unnecessary local interactive accounts, and reduce the number of non-administrative users who can log on locally to multi-user systems - accepting that this can disrupt shared-workstation and kiosk workflows. Additionally, monitor Group Policy client activity (gpsvc and related event logs) and restrict use of Group Policy editing and gpupdate tooling to administrators, which may slow legitimate administrative workflows but limits the reachable attack surface for a post-compromise elevation. Remove users from local Administrators and other privileged groups unless operationally required, and consider segmenting domain-joined endpoints so a locally elevated host cannot immediately extend control across the domain.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 18 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Windows Group Policy is the management framework through which domain and local policy settings are delivered and applied by the Group Policy client service (gpsvc) and its client-side extensions, typically executing with high privileges during policy processing. The vulnerability class is CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), which aligns with Microsoft's description of improper privilege management: a privileged Group Policy operation is not adequately gated, so a caller holding only low-privileged local access can cause it to perform actions beyond its intended authorization boundary. The assessed CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms the vulnerability is local and requires the attacker to already be an authenticated user on the host, with no user interaction and no scope change; it cannot be triggered remotely or anonymously. No CPE strings were supplied in the intelligence feed, so the exact affected Windows builds and component paths are not enumerated here and should be taken from the referenced Microsoft advisory.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local privilege escalation by an already-authenticated low-privileged user (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N) with no added complexity (AC:L), yielding full SYSTEM-level C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper privilege management in Windows Group Policy allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity access-control vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Group Policy could allow an attacker with an existing foothold on a Windows host to gain higher-privilege access, with elevated risk on shared multi-user systems such as terminal/RDS servers, VDI hosts, and domain-joined endpoints. Leadership should care because these systems often support many users and may become a stepping stone to broader domain compromise, and no vendor-released patch is currently identified at time of analysis. Security teams should prioritize containment, monitoring, and readiness for emergency patching.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting interactive and code-execution access on shared multi-user systems, enforcing least privilege, application allowlisting, EDR monitoring for Group Policy privilege escalation, limiting privileged group membership, and isolating RDS/VDI hosts from tier-0 assets.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-100330
GHSA-gr69-29v4-7f5p
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB