Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticated local access to Windows host
  2. Exploit
    Abuse improper Group Policy privilege management
  3. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local, interactive or code-execution access on the Windows host as an authenticated low-privileged user (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - this cannot be triggered remotely or anonymously. The affected feature is Windows Group Policy processing; no end-user interaction is needed (UI:N) and complexity is low (AC:L), with no special non-default configuration indicated by the description. Limiting factors: the mandatory existing authenticated foothold and local-only vector confine this to post-compromise privilege escalation, most impactful on shared/multi-user systems (terminal/RDS servers, VDI) and domain-joined endpoints where untrusted users have accounts; the specific required patch level is not stated in the input.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a local, low-complexity privilege escalation requiring an already-authenticated low-privileged user and no user interaction, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the affected system - a classic LPE profile where an attacker who already has a foothold gains SYSTEM. The attack vector (AV:L) and required privileges (PR:L) materially cap the real-world risk: this cannot be exploited remotely or by an unauthenticated actor, so it is a second-stage/post-compromise tool rather than an initial-access or wormable flaw. No EPSS score was supplied, no SSVC decision data was provided, the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, so there is no evidence of active exploitation at this time - exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The one notable data conflict: the input tag 'Authentication Bypass' is inconsistent with the vulnerability class - this is improper privilege management / missing authorization (CWE-862) enabling privilege elevation, not an authentication bypass, and the CVSS PR:L confirms the attacker is already authenticated. Net: patch on a normal Patch-Tuesday cadence as part of Windows servicing, prioritized higher on multi-user hosts, RDS/Citrix session hosts, and domain-joined endpoints where low-privileged users operate.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged but authenticated user (or malware running in that user's context after phishing/initial access) abuses improper privilege management in Windows Group Policy processing on the local machine to elevate to SYSTEM. No user interaction and no additional complexity is required (AC:L/UI:N), so it reliably chains after any foothold on a domain-joined or multi-user Windows host. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code is referenced at the time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Windows Group Policy allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who already has interactive or code-execution access on a Windows host to elevate privileges to a higher-integrity context. The flaw is an access-control weakness (CWE-862) in how a privileged Group Policy operation is authorized, requiring no user interaction (UI:N) and low attack complexity (AC:L) once a foothold exists, which makes it most impactful on shared multi-user systems such as terminal/RDS servers, VDI hosts, and domain-joined endpoints where untrusted users hold accounts. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and Microsoft is credited as the reporting vendor.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released fixed version is specified in the provided data, so the primary action is to consult and apply the Microsoft MSRC update guide for CVE-2026-100217 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-100217) and deploy Microsoft's patched builds as soon as they are available through normal Windows Update/WSUS channels. Until a fixed build is applied, compensating controls should target the mandatory local authenticated foothold: restrict interactive logon rights on shared hosts (RDS/VDI) to trusted accounts, remove or disable unnecessary local interactive accounts, and reduce the number of non-administrative users who can log on locally to multi-user systems - accepting that this can disrupt shared-workstation and kiosk workflows. Additionally, monitor Group Policy client activity (gpsvc and related event logs) and restrict use of Group Policy editing and gpupdate tooling to administrators, which may slow legitimate administrative workflows but limits the reachable attack surface for a post-compromise elevation. Remove users from local Administrators and other privileged groups unless operationally required, and consider segmenting domain-joined endpoints so a locally elevated host cannot immediately extend control across the domain.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 18 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Windows Group Policy is the management framework through which domain and local policy settings are delivered and applied by the Group Policy client service (gpsvc) and its client-side extensions, typically executing with high privileges during policy processing. The vulnerability class is CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), which aligns with Microsoft's description of improper privilege management: a privileged Group Policy operation is not adequately gated, so a caller holding only low-privileged local access can cause it to perform actions beyond its intended authorization boundary. The assessed CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms the vulnerability is local and requires the attacker to already be an authenticated user on the host, with no user interaction and no scope change; it cannot be triggered remotely or anonymously. No CPE strings were supplied in the intelligence feed, so the exact affected Windows builds and component paths are not enumerated here and should be taken from the referenced Microsoft advisory.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local privilege escalation by an already-authenticated low-privileged user (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N) with no added complexity (AC:L), yielding full SYSTEM-level C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:17 nvd
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper privilege management in Windows Group Policy allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity access-control vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Group Policy could allow an attacker with an existing foothold on a Windows host to gain higher-privilege access, with elevated risk on shared multi-user systems such as terminal/RDS servers, VDI hosts, and domain-joined endpoints. Leadership should care because these systems often support many users and may become a stepping stone to broader domain compromise, and no vendor-released patch is currently identified at time of analysis. Security teams should prioritize containment, monitoring, and readiness for emergency patching.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting interactive and code-execution access on shared multi-user systems, enforcing least privilege, application allowlisting, EDR monitoring for Group Policy privilege escalation, limiting privileged group membership, and isolating RDS/VDI hosts from tier-0 assets.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 81% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Group Policy is a core component of virtually all Windows deployments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy